< May 4 May 6 >

May 5

Category:Recipients of the Order of Liberty (Ukraine)

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete. Good Ol’factory (talk) 01:22, 13 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Nondefining award for both Ukrainian and foreign recipients. At ukwiki all the articles just list it with other awards. (t · c) buidhe 22:02, 5 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Ambassadors of China to Eswatini

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: rename as nominated per Category:Ambassadors of the Republic of China, excluding DRC which is correct as it stands. Delete Eswatini, Haiti, St Lucia, & St Vincent and the Grenadines, as these are empty having apparently each contained only a list which is now sufficiently parented. – Fayenatic London 21:35, 13 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Propose renaming Category:Ambassadors of China to Eswatini to Category:Ambassadors of the Republic of China to Eswatini
Nominator's rationale: Eswatini is the only African country to maintain relations with Taiwan (and hence not with China).[1] Also C2C (Category:Ambassadors of the Republic of China) and C2D. Clarityfiend (talk) 21:38, 5 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment. About half the subcategories in Foreign relations say Taiwan, the other half Republic of China, so we should be consistent, one way or the other. Clarityfiend (talk) 20:22, 6 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Portrait paintings of the Louvre

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: rename. Good Ol’factory (talk) 01:20, 13 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Per C2C and common sense. Clarityfiend (talk) 21:18, 5 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • support. There are very few notable portrait paintings of the Louvre. Furius (talk) 21:31, 5 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Image Comics American superheroes

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge. Good Ol’factory (talk) 01:20, 13 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Only three articles (soon to be two after an AfD finishes). This will definitely not expand. Also merge to "American superheroes." TTN (talk) 18:37, 5 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Jonang texts

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge. Good Ol’factory (talk) 01:19, 13 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: upmerge per WP:SMALLCAT, currently only one article. Marcocapelle (talk) 18:25, 5 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Television series in Georgia (country)

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2021 May 13#Category:Television series in Georgia (country)

Category:Current Pakistani television series

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete. Good Ol’factory (talk) 01:16, 13 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: We don't categorize television series by "current", we go by the year of their debut and the year of their ending. Gonnym (talk) 17:40, 5 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Puerto Rican people

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: procedural close (this editorial discussion seems to have led to a satisfactory solution) (non-admin closure) Marcocapelle (talk) 13:30, 13 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Should this (and all its subcategories) be in Category:People by nationality? As I understand it Puerto Rico has been part of the USA since 1898. Rathfelder (talk) 14:25, 5 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
OK, thank you. I think we need to bring all the subcategories inline. Rathfelder (talk) 22:26, 5 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Order of the Nine Gems

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete. Good Ol’factory (talk) 01:16, 13 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Nondefining Thai award. On thwiki, this award is mainly given out to Thai royals and listed with other awards. On enwiki, it is not remotely defining to recipients like Sarit Thanarat, Mahidol Adulyadej, or Chakrabongse Bhuvanath. (t · c) buidhe 09:41, 5 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Order of Ramkeerati

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete. Good Ol’factory (talk) 01:15, 13 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: This award is for services to scouting. However, I checked at thwiki and it appears that the vast majority of notable recipients (on that wiki) are not notable for their scouting activities, and this award is just listed with others with no sign of being defining. Of enwiki articles in this category, people like Carl XVI Gustaf, Prem Tinsulanonda, or Sarit Thanarat are not remotely defined by this award. (t · c) buidhe 09:16, 5 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Recipients of the Order of the Crown of the Realm

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete. Good Ol’factory (talk) 01:15, 13 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: This award "is conferred to the Queen of Malaysia and newly appointed Malay rulers in his state. Fifteen, out of the total, are conferred on foreign princes, foreign Heads of State and other distinguished individuals." In other words, people receive this award due to their position/office, and should be categorized by that position/office rather than this award. The Honorary category appears to be awarded as a diplomatic souvenir only. Checked several bios and it's listed with other awards. Already listified at the main article. (t · c) buidhe 09:08, 5 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Family in Arkansas

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete. Good Ol’factory (talk) 01:14, 13 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: unnecessary intermediate levels between Category:Arkansas society and Category:Schools in Arkansas, which is the only content. No such categories for any other American state. Place Clichy (talk) 09:07, 5 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Community of Christ temples

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge (non-admin closure) Marcocapelle (talk) 13:33, 13 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: There are only two—Kirtland Temple and Independence Temple—and there are no plans to build or establish any more. I suggest upmerging to the parents, neither of which are particularly large. Good Ol’factory (talk) 04:04, 5 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Recipients of the Order of Viesturs

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete. Good Ol’factory (talk) 01:13, 13 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Nondefining Latvian award. According to lvwiki it has indeed been awarded to many Latvians but does not appear to be defining, just being listed with other awards or not mentioned at all (except in categories). (t · c) buidhe 04:02, 5 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Recipients of the Order of al-Hussein bin Ali

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete. Good Ol’factory (talk) 01:13, 13 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Diplomatic souvenir given out to domestic and foreign royalty. Doesn't matter whether you look at enwiki or arwiki, there's no indication that this award is defining. (t · c) buidhe 03:54, 5 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Recipients of the Royal Victorian Chain

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete. Good Ol’factory (talk) 01:12, 13 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: This award is mostly given out as a diplomatic souvenir or to friends of the British monarch. People like Nicholas II of Russia, François Mitterrand, Haile Selassie, Qaboos bin Said, Harald V of Norway etc. are not remotely defined by this award. Already listified at List of recipients of the Royal Victorian Chain. (t · c) buidhe 03:49, 5 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Recipients of the Order of Adolphe of Nassau

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete. Good Ol’factory (talk) 01:11, 13 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Nondefining Luxembourgish award. Most recipients with enwiki articles received it as a diplomatic souvenir. But it does not appear to be defining for non-royal/Luxembourgish recipients such as Romain Mancinelli, Mstislav Rostropovich, Richard E. Nugent or Auguste Laval either. I looked at several articles on lbwiki and saw no indication that this award is defining. (t · c) buidhe 03:36, 5 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Neural networks

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: no consensus. Good Ol’factory (talk) 04:50, 3 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: turn into dab page, this is about either biological neural circuits or about artificial neural networks, topics in completely different fields. In article space Neural network (disambiguation) is a dab page too. Marcocapelle (talk) 06:46, 2 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Well, you make a good case for adopting the AI meaning. Charles Matthews (talk) 15:09, 26 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Good Ol’factory (talk) 01:27, 5 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Summiters of Aconcagua

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete. Good Ol’factory (talk) 01:11, 13 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Propose Deleting Category:Summiters of Aconcagua
Nominator's rationale: Per WP:PERFCAT
Aconcagua is the tallest mountain in South American an many prominent mountain climbers who want to brag about climbing mountains on each continent to complete the Seven Summits will ascend it. The 3 articles (Domi Trastoy Díaz, Sergey Kofanov, and Monique Richard) all list this mountain in passing among other mountains and are already categorized somewhere under Category:Mountain climbers. I don't even think this topic warrants listifying because, according to the main article, "In mountaineering terms, Aconcagua is technically an easy mountain if approached from the north". - RevelationDirect (talk) 00:22, 5 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Historic Hotels Worldwide

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete. Good Ol’factory (talk) 01:09, 13 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Propose Deleting Category:Historic Hotels Worldwide
Nominator's rationale: Per WP:TRIVIALCAT
The American National Trust for Historic Preservation is a historic preservation group that lists international hotels they consider to be historically significant on their Historic Hotels Worldwide web site. While some package tours are available, this is not a standard reservation service nor a legal heritage register but more of a third party marketing effort, as described in their website. The closest category I could find was Category:Michelin Guide starred restaurants but the non-US hotels in this category generally don't even mention this endorsement so it's clearly not defining. There is no main article to listify the category contents so I instead copied them right here so no work is lost of another editor wants to create a list article. - RevelationDirect (talk) 00:22, 5 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks, retried! - RevelationDirect (talk) 12:19, 5 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • @RevelationDirect: still did not get a notification, that is annoying. Perhaps a fresh paragraph and a fresh signature are required, admittedly I am guessing now. Marcocapelle (talk) 20:56, 5 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
More