The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: speedy delete (non-admin closure) Marcocapelle (talk) 17:40, 9 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Propose deleting Category:Images of schools (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Nominator's rationale: Somebody please delete this page I accidentally created it and forgot it had to be in commons Lallint (talk) 21:35, 8 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: keep (non-admin closure) Marcocapelle (talk) 06:50, 16 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Propose deleting Category:Recipients of the Order of the Tower and Sword (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Nominator's rationale: This category was deleted at as part of a mass CfD of similar categories at Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2021 January 10#Category:Order of Saint_Michael. The rationale was: "Not defining. Some of the many orders of chivalry awarded to heads of state, consorts and sovereign family members. They are rarely mentioned in the articles, and are certainly not regarded as significant." A discussion at Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2021 October 22 concluded that this category should be relisted separately. This is a procedural nomination, I am neutral. Sandstein 09:49, 8 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment This category is empty. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 20:26, 9 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • It had been emptied since deletion; I've reverted it to its previous state after the deletion review. RickMorais (talk) 02:15, 10 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. The category refers to recipients of the Military Order of the Tower and Sword, which was and still is the most senior award in the Portuguese honours system and the highest award conferred to by the Portuguese government. In that regard, as I pointed out in the review discussion, it was mischaracterised in the original deletion discussion and it is just about as defining a characteristic, as required by WP:OCAWARD, as other similar categories like Category:Recipients of the Legion of Honour or Category:Presidential Medal of Freedom recipients. RickMorais (talk) 02:15, 10 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep per RickMorais. Thriley (talk) 05:08, 10 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep -- I think this falls within the exception to OCAWARD, since it is the premier award in the Portuguese honours system. In some countries some awards are given so often that a category is undesirable. In other cases it is a diplomatic souvenir awarded on a state visit by a head of state. Peterkingiron (talk) 19:04, 10 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: rename to Category:Academies of arts. bibliomaniac15 03:50, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Propose renaming Category:Academies of Arts to Category:Academies of arts

Nominator's rationale: While most of the members capitalise "Academy of Arts" as part of a proper name, I think that this one should not be capitalised per MOS:CAPS. ~~~~
User:1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 15:51, 31 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Support this is a category of academies where arts are the main focuses of study. Not academies called variations of "Academies of Art[s]". Therefore, capitilising "Arts" doesn't make any real sense. SSSB (talk) 11:41, 8 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Support - this is a speedy. Oculi (talk) 19:08, 8 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Support per nom --Lenticel ^(talk) 01:31, 11 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete (non-admin closure) Marcocapelle (talk) 06:53, 16 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Propose deleting Category:Recursive acronyms (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Nominator's rationale: Non-defining. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 01:05, 8 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom. It's kinda cool but is otherwise trivial. --Lenticel ^(talk) 07:32, 11 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.