Lunatic_MLS → Lunatic_VIVIVI

Mohammad abrar wadud → Mohammad.abrar.wadud

 Bureaucrat note: - Wikipedia is unable to have first letters be lowercase. However, to make the first letter appear lowercase add ((lowercase)) to your userpage. Also you may want to customize your signature. Or we could change your username to Mohammad Abrar Wadud. Kingturtle (talk) 03:45, 22 June 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]
 Not done no reply. Kingturtle (talk) 18:35, 29 June 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Uker → UKER

 Not done Discussing it at WP:CHUU. Kingturtle (talk) 18:37, 29 June 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]

SFCardwell → CardwellTax

 Not done Promotional. Kingturtle (talk) 18:38, 29 June 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Apollo Augustus Koo → 蘇州宇文宙武

I wanna unify all my user names in wiki, thanks. --Apollo Augustus Koo (talk) 02:42, 27 June 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Yes, I'm exactly 蘇州宇文宙武 himself. --Apollo Augustus Koo (talk) 02:44, 27 June 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Awakened Nations → Awakenednations

CURRENT Mauriziomancioli → NEW Maurizio Mancioli

Headlinestheatre → Headlines Theatre

 Clerk note: Promotional usernames are against policy. Please request a non-promotional username or your current username may be blocked. Useight (talk) 20:40, 30 June 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]
 Not done Promotional. Kingturtle (talk) 20:53, 30 June 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]

CURRENT → NEW

Coyotebeauty → Bunga (TV Series)

 Not done Kingturtle (talk) 02:50, 2 July 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Awais Majeed Khan./ → khan g.

 Not done Please make the request again from your account. Kingturtle (talk) 02:48, 2 July 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]

vksingh123 → Vinod K Singh

VisibleChanges → Things To Know

 Not done Just register a new account. EVula // talk // // 19:18, 3 July 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]

VEmarketing → Mdrake

 Not done See SoWhy's comment for what you need to do if you'd like to be renamed to "Mdrake". EVula // talk // // 19:19, 3 July 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Deon555 → Deon

 Not done per the withdrawal of the request. EVula // talk // // 16:04, 4 July 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Deon555 → Deon

 Not done per the withdrawal of the request. EVula // talk // // 16:04, 4 July 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Mgmvegas → Richard

Jimmy Lavoie → Jimmy

Fhue → Prbeacon

Johnbull → Britannicus

On realising this username is already taken I have moved the request to usurpations.--Johnbull (talk) 18:38, 6 July 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]

MehdiPedia → MehdiHosseinkouchack

Hushhomewear → Hush homewear

Kevin_Doran → Kdkd

Kevin Doran (talk) 22:20, 7 July 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]

 Not done Take this to WP:CHUU. Kingturtle (talk) 01:57, 8 July 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Rzdemarco → Mozartboy

Infpos →

"Pradeep singh rana" → "RAM RAM"

 Clerk note: Which username do you want? "RAM RAM" or "ram ram ram"? -- Sk8er5000 (talk) 08:36, 10 July 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]
 Clerk note: The username Pradeep singh rana (talk · contribs) has made no contributions to the project aside from this edit, or has only a few minor contributions. -- Sk8er5000 (talk) 08:46, 10 July 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]
 Not done – no reason given and submitted two requests. —Anonymous DissidentTalk 09:06, 10 July 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]

"pradeep singh rana" → "ram ram ram"

 Clerk note: Which username do you want? "RAM RAM" or "ram ram ram"? -- Sk8er5000 (talk) 08:36, 10 July 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]
 Clerk note: The username Pradeep singh rana (talk · contribs) has made no contributions to the project aside from this edit, or has only a few minor contributions. -- Sk8er5000 (talk) 08:47, 10 July 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]
 Not done – no reason given and submitted two requests. —Anonymous DissidentTalk 09:06, 10 July 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]

NEBS-Canada → CLMB-Barrie

 Clerk note: Are you sure the target username isn't promotional as well? –Juliancolton | Talk 16:01, 2 July 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]

CalcbikeUSBPriapPs2 → YYZ

 Bureaucrat note: Do you intend to edit the encyclopedia at some point? All your edits have been to user pages or sandboxes. EVula // talk // // 15:51, 4 July 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Sudip bhattai → Sudip

Marketing Coordinator → Kim Hamilton

RKRPRODUCTIONS → RKRP

  •  Clerk note: The target username is an abbreviation for RKRProductions. Please choose a new username that doesn't resemble a company. –Juliancolton | Talk 00:39, 12 July 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Interestedinfairness → Zelda64

Spirra → Sephia

Mgmvegas → Richard

Anlee → Pfrand

CURRENT Appaloosa.journal → NEW appaloosaenthusiast

User name one → ~~~~ → Username

 Not done Impossible (discussing the original "~~~~" request). EVula // talk // // 16:50, 15 July 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]

InterConVie → InterContinental Vienna Hotel

InterConVie (talk) 12:05, 15 July 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]

 Not done Your requested username is an even worse violator of our username policy than your current one. Simply register a new account with a name that does related back to the hotel in any way, shape, or form. EVula // talk // // 16:57, 15 July 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Immiconsult → ImmiConsult Limited

 Clerk note: The username Immiconsult (talk · contribs) has made no contributions to the project aside from this edit, or has only a few minor contributions. -- Sk8er5000 (talk) 11:19, 10 July 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]
 Clerk note: This username may classify as an inappropriate username under the username policy . Please choose another name. -- Sk8er5000 (talk) 11:19, 10 July 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Katliang → Bluespheres9

 Bureaucrat note: Looks like the account was created after this request was placed; can you verify that this is you? EVula // talk // // 17:33, 15 July 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]
 Clerk note: This request is now irrelevant; a second request was submitted and completed. Useight (talk) 22:41, 15 July 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]

~NIC → Raunak

 Not done See: Archive57. The Jan '09 Raunak → ~NIC request was made for privacy and unified acc. Previous to that, this user had a name change request honored in Nov 2008. I don't see any reason to honor this new request. Kingturtle (talk) 21:53, 16 July 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]

KaBlooming → Kabloom The Power of Fresh Flowers

Want the entire name within the title KaBlooming (talk) 21:08, 16 July 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]

 Clerk note: Promotional usernames are against policy. Please request a non-promotional username, as your current and requested usernames may be blocked per the aforementioned policy. Useight (talk) 21:13, 16 July 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]
 Not done Username block. EVula // talk // // 21:26, 16 July 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Sahin → NEW

 Not done I don't think it's been fulfilled, partly because it states the request is for Sahin but it was filed by Vogut. EVula // talk // // 15:50, 19 July 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Jjkkcc48 → Jjkkcc48

Thanks for reading this, John Jjkkcc48 (talk) 05:27, 14 July 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]

 Not done EVula // talk // // 15:45, 19 July 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Frenchartist → ChristopherBeau

 Bureaucrat note: Performing a rename will not automatically create an article about you. Furthermore, your only contribution as been to create a spamish userpage, so I'm hesitant to perform this rename. EVula // talk // // 01:38, 18 July 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]
 Not done – I agree with EVula. —Anonymous DissidentTalk 03:23, 20 July 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Supreme Deliciousness → Supreme Allah

 Not done Pick a username that wouldn't be grossly offensive to a particular religion. EVula // talk // // 17:37, 18 July 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]
 Bureaucrat note: I fully support EVula's decision on this matter. Kingturtle (talk) 20:12, 18 July 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]
 Clerk note: As do I. –Juliancolton | Talk 20:13, 18 July 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]
admins please, there is nothing insulting about it, Allah means God, nothing else. Many people have Allah: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special%3AListUsers&username=Allah&group=&limit=50 And many people have God: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special%3AListUsers&username=God&group=&limit=50 The fact that you have allowed so many people to have it, and now not me? Is this fair? Please reconsider. --Supreme Deliciousness (talk) 20:25, 18 July 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]
 Clerk note: The argument that the existence of similar usernames indicates that this username should be permitted is a logical fallacy. Also summed up, albeit in an article-related fashion, at WP:OSE. I agree with the decision not to perform this rename; however, my take is kind of the opposite of EVula's: the username would more offensive to those who do not subscribe to a particular religion. Useight (talk) 20:52, 18 July 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Agree with Useight. Calling a god supreme is usually not offensive to people who follow this god but might be to everyone else. Regards SoWhy 21:01, 18 July 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]
I never specified which particular religion would be offended, or that there'd be only one offended group. ;) EVula // talk // // 22:23, 18 July 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]
I strongly object to approving Supreme Deliciousness's name change to Supreme Allah. This would be grossly offensive and tantamount to blasphemy! --Arab Cowboy (talk) 11:27, 19 July 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]
The username would be very offensive to christian or muslim arabs, as it implies that the user sees himself as "Supreme Allah". I don't see why you'd want that username anyway, which would undermine your neutrality in any related discussion. Most of the usernames you referred to have 1-10 edits, you on the other hand would be more involved and pose more problems. --Diaa abdelmoneim (talk) 09:29, 20 July 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]

M_novakov → Novakoff

IEFPublicAffairs → SimonStoddart

OK thanks for advice. Can I request name change to "EmptyQuarter" instead?IEFPublicAffairs (talk) 13:17, 21 July 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Iowa Lakes Corridor → Iowa Lakes Corridor Development Corporation

 Not done Promotional usernames are not allowed (as Sk8er5000 pointed out). EVula // talk // // 20:51, 21 July 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]

WETDesign → Fernanda Andrade

  •  Clerk note: If the target username is your real name, are you aware of the potential consequences associated with revealing your identity? –Juliancolton | Talk 20:10, 7 July 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Should there be no response, would the default position be to carry out the rename? –Juliancolton | Talk 02:41, 16 July 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]

bethandrob → Robert Evenden

 Clerk note: Please provide a reason for renaming. -- Sk8er5000 (talk) 04:45, 11 July 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]
 Clerk note: Are you aware of (and comfortable with) the potential implications associated with using a real name? -- Sk8er5000 (talk) 04:45, 11 July 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Linczone → DeeGee

Interestedinfairness → Dardani

Fecurt → Frank.e.curtis

Puptonator → I8A4RE

 Bureaucrat note: You mention that you'd like a unique username, but "I8A4RE" is similar to the existing username "I8ASHOE". Could you pick a more unique name, preferably one that isn't a seemingly random collection of numbers and letters? EVula // talk // // 16:53, 15 July 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]

SkyCaptain → DavidBethune

Zylian → Zylian

GRMOTM → Linda Swain

 Not done Considering your edits to Linda Swain, please read our page on conflict of interest and choose a different username. bibliomaniac15 15:38, 23 July 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]

ChiPhiSigma → Chi Phi Sigma

Mjfan1 → Im A Martian

Comment Exactly how many accounts do you think you need? You already have three, two of which you've already used once in violation of our sockpuppettry rules. (see [1] and [2]). OhNoitsJamie Talk 01:52, 25 July 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]
 Not done per above. bibliomaniac15 18:05, 25 July 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Madeleinediaz → MobileSyncBrowser

 Clerk note: The username appears to be promotional. Use of a company, organization, group, website, or product name as a username is prohibited by the username policy. Please choose another name. Javert I knit sweaters, yo! 02:08, 25 July 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Userpage (now deleted) confirms this. –Juliancolton | Talk 02:15, 25 July 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]
 Not done per above. bibliomaniac15 18:07, 25 July 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Grahamzilch → Rannpháirtí anaithnid

 Clerk note: Unfortunately, accounts cannot be merged nor deleted. You may be able to WP:USURP one account with the other, but I haven't looked into the number of edits or their GDFL-compliance. Useight (talk) 05:46, 23 July 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]
The old account has approx. 6,500 edits. The new one has approx. 1,700 edits (that's the one I'm posting from now). The reason I ask is because Wikipedia:Requests for administrator attention says this is the place to "Reassign edits or make name changes." Maybe that's a remnant from the distant past (when IP edits could be reassigned to a user name).
It's my own fault, I know. So, if it ain't possible to reassign the edits, I'll just have to live with it. Thanks. --rannṗáirtí anaiṫnid (coṁrá) 10:16, 23 July 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  •  Bureaucrat note: Edits can be reassigned to a new name as part of a name change. At this point, the software does not permit assigning edits to a pre-existing name, sorry. -- Avi (talk) 16:50, 23 July 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]
 Clerk note: In theory, through a series of usurpations, you could get the 6500 edits moved to the account that currently has 1700, if you prefer that name, but you won't be able to get all 8200 to the same account. Useight (talk) 20:01, 23 July 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Thanks to you both. It's my own fault anyway.
This may seem strange - I don't know what software you have - but would it be possible to assign both to a new account (i.e. "simultaneously" reassign edits from the old account and the current account to a wholly new account)? Otherwise, I think it would be a developer job ... and I really don't think my couple of edits called that ;-)
Much thanks regardless and sorry for pestering you with requests for something I messed up on. --rannṗáirtí anaiṫnid (coṁrá) 23:45, 23 July 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]
 Bureaucrat note: Without developer intervention, unfortunately not. The software only allows one-to-one assignments, and this would requre many-to-one. Sorry. So, what would you like to do under the restrictions of the software? -- Avi (talk) 14:52, 24 July 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Thanks. Let's park it. I'll give consideration to contacting a developer through the IRC channel. In the mean time, do you think that there would be any problem with the "Grahamzilch" account editing that's account's user and talk page with a redirect and note to the "Rannpháirtí anaithnid" account? And placing a note on "Rannpháirtí anaithnid" user page to the guist that I previously edited under the "Grahamzilch" account? --rannṗáirtí anaiṫnid (coṁrá) 10:48, 25 July 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]
 Bureaucrat note: Not at all. We also have ((FormerAccount)) which may be appropriate. -- Avi (talk) 05:59, 26 July 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Done. Thanks, Avi. Case closed, I guess. (Still thinking about contacting a developer ... but just thinking for now.) --rannṗáirtí anaiṫnid (coṁrá) 21:57, 26 July 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]
 Bureaucrat note: My pleasure. Sorry we couldn't be of more help. -- Avi (talk) 23:56, 26 July 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]

 Not done per above. -- Avi (talk) 23:57, 26 July 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Scottiebradleywallace → Mr Scott Bradley Wallace

 Clerk note: Formatting malformed request. King of ♠ 16:51, 24 July 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]
 Clerk note: Moved from WP:CHU/U. King of ♠ 16:54, 24 July 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]
 Not done I have serious concerns about the requesting editor's actual purpose for being on Wikipedia; their sole contribution seems to be their mess of a userpage, which is currently at MfD. EVula // talk // // 15:43, 27 July 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Dr. Blofeld → Himalayan Explorer

You mean because I might crash the server and leave loads of frustrated Americans turning to Sanger's encyclopedia instead LOL? You mean I'm stuck being Aevil for life? Dr. Blofeld White cat 16:26, 27 July 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Decline then, OK, forget the idea then. Don't want to cause any server trouble. The next time somebody says I'm lazy and do little to improve this site tell em I couldn't change my user name because it is embedded in too many articles!! I'll have to build a Buddhist meditation chamber in my volcano with panoramic scenery of mountains then. I'm happy then to pretend it is still the swinging 60s and the war is still a Cold one then... Dr. Blofeld White cat 16:48, 27 July 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]

 Not done For what it's worth, I totally agree with Kingturtle; I like the username "Dr. Blofeld". :) EVula // talk // // 17:09, 27 July 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]

That's a pretty good excuse to stay being evil then. Dr. Blofeld White cat 17:15, 27 July 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]

 Bureaucrat note: Per the evil Dr. Vibber "Servers would not be very happy; don't do it." Sorry -- Avi (talk) 18:17, 27 July 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]