Autism Initiatives – keep deleted because it's a copyvio, without prejudice against creating a new article that is not a copyvio. – >Radiant< 13:10, 2 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The following is an archived debate of the deletion review of the article above. Please do not modify it.
Autism Initiatives (edit \| talk \| history \| protect \| delete \| links \| watch \| logs \| views) `(`restore`\|`cache`\|`AfD`)` This should not have been deleted, as it clearly meets WP:CORP. They are clearly notable enough for encyclopedic inclusion here, and are not a CSD G11 blatant advert case, but are a notable British charity. This article should be undeleted and tagged with ((drv)) to allow discussion. I can't see any reason to keep this deleted, it's not like Doosan (which has been the subject of deletion/undeletion wars!). Undelete, and allow a second discussion to take place. Kelswitch 18:24, 1 August 2007 (UTC)[reply] Keep deleted as a copyvio of [1]. Entire chunks of sentences are the same in the deleted article. Copyvio deletions are almost always without prejudice against a non-copyvio article being written, and that seems to be the case here. --W.marsh 18:38, 1 August 2007 (UTC)[reply] Endorse deletion as closing admin (thanks W.marsh for notifying me) per my AfD closing statement. It was deleted per CSD G12 (a mandatory procedure if evidence indicates so), which is not addressed in your DRV nom. —Kurykh 18:52, 1 August 2007 (UTC)[reply] Keep deleted, definitely a copyvio, and we can't restore copyvios. --Core desat 19:39, 1 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The above is an archived debate of the deletion review of the article above. Please do not modify it.

Autism Initiatives – keep deleted because it's a copyvio, without prejudice against creating a new article that is not a copyvio. – >Radiant< 13:10, 2 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The following is an archived debate of the deletion review of the article above. Please do not modify it.

This should not have been deleted, as it clearly meets WP:CORP. They are clearly notable enough for encyclopedic inclusion here, and are not a CSD G11 blatant advert case, but are a notable British charity. This article should be undeleted and tagged with ((drv)) to allow discussion. I can't see any reason to keep this deleted, it's not like Doosan (which has been the subject of deletion/undeletion wars!). Undelete, and allow a second discussion to take place. Kelswitch 18:24, 1 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Keep deleted as a copyvio of [1]. Entire chunks of sentences are the same in the deleted article. Copyvio deletions are almost always without prejudice against a non-copyvio article being written, and that seems to be the case here. --W.marsh 18:38, 1 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Endorse deletion as closing admin (thanks W.marsh for notifying me) per my AfD closing statement. It was deleted per CSD G12 (a mandatory procedure if evidence indicates so), which is not addressed in your DRV nom. —Kurykh 18:52, 1 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep deleted, definitely a copyvio, and we can't restore copyvios. --Core desat 19:39, 1 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above is an archived debate of the deletion review of the article above. Please do not modify it.

NanoGaming – Deletion endorsed. Recreation of non-spam, reliably sourced content is always welcome. – Xoloz 01:14, 6 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The following is an archived debate of the deletion review of the article above. Please do not modify it.
NanoGaming (edit \| talk \| history \| protect \| delete \| links \| watch \| logs \| views) `(`restore`\|`cache`\|`AfD`)` I work for the company who makes NanoGaming. There are several customer sites that reference NanoGaming (NASCAR & Global TV's Big Brother 8, with more coming soon!) I think a quick definition of what NanoGaming is would be appropriate considering thousands of people are already currently using it on the NASCAR site alone. I've pared it down to the bare essential information (below). No more marketing language or copyright infringement. You can verify my authenticity by emailing LiveHive systems, www.livehivesystems.com tammy.gaudun@livehivesystems.com. Please reinstate the definition below for NanoGaming — Preceding unsigned comment added by Whambamtam (talk • contribs) [paste of deleted article redacted by W.marsh] Allow recreation A lot of what was deleted was blatant advertising, but this company does seem to officially develop software for NASCAR and other major entertainment ventures. [2], [3]. I think if this was recreated as an encyclopedia article, not a press release, it probably could meet our notability standards. --W.marsh 17:57, 1 August 2007 (UTC)[reply] Allow recreation if and only if the text is not blatant advertising or a copyright violation. You may write an article about the subject, post it on the talk page, and when it is a valid article you may create it. Please try to avoid a possible conflict of interest, though. Mel sa ran (formerly Salaskаn) 17:34, 4 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The above is an archived debate of the deletion review of the article above. Please do not modify it.

NanoGaming – Deletion endorsed. Recreation of non-spam, reliably sourced content is always welcome. – Xoloz 01:14, 6 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The following is an archived debate of the deletion review of the article above. Please do not modify it.

I work for the company who makes NanoGaming. There are several customer sites that reference NanoGaming (NASCAR & Global TV's Big Brother 8, with more coming soon!) I think a quick definition of what NanoGaming is would be appropriate considering thousands of people are already currently using it on the NASCAR site alone. I've pared it down to the bare essential information (below). No more marketing language or copyright infringement. You can verify my authenticity by emailing LiveHive systems, www.livehivesystems.com tammy.gaudun@livehivesystems.com. Please reinstate the definition below for NanoGaming — Preceding unsigned comment added by Whambamtam (talk • contribs)

[paste of deleted article redacted by W.marsh]

Allow recreation A lot of what was deleted was blatant advertising, but this company does seem to officially develop software for NASCAR and other major entertainment ventures. [2], [3]. I think if this was recreated as an encyclopedia article, not a press release, it probably could meet our notability standards. --W.marsh 17:57, 1 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Allow recreation if and only if the text is not blatant advertising or a copyright violation. You may write an article about the subject, post it on the talk page, and when it is a valid article you may create it. Please try to avoid a possible conflict of interest, though. Mel sa ran (formerly Salaskаn) 17:34, 4 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above is an archived debate of the deletion review of the article above. Please do not modify it.

Brandon Davis – Resolved. – >Radiant< 14:56, 1 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The following is an archived debate of the deletion review of the article above. Please do not modify it.
Brandon Davis (edit \| talk \| history \| protect \| delete \| links \| watch \| logs \| views) `(`restore`\|`cache`\|`AfD`)` Can it be redirected to Brandon Davis (heir) Looks like thats a legit article...? Freedomeagle 06:22, 1 August 2007 (UTC)[reply] Comment What you're asking for should be "Can Brandon Davis (heir) be moved to Brandon Davis?" This is nothing but a move request, we don't need the community to rule on it. There may be a question of recreated content, however; I can't tell how different your new article is from the old. --Dhartung \| Talk 06:27, 1 August 2007 (UTC)[reply] Its not mine, I just found it, never even heard of the guy before. The regular non-heir one is locked up so I can't do it and I saw it was a deleted a zillion times.[4] Freedomeagle 06:31, 1 August 2007 (UTC)[reply] Sorry if this was the wrong section, where should I go?Freedomeagle 06:32, 1 August 2007 (UTC)[reply] The entry that was deleted was about a professional wrestler called Brandon Davis. this one is the guy who has dated PAris Hilton. It's referenced well enough, asserts notability and so on, so I have moved it to Brandon Davis. I have moved this article to the new location, this can be closed (won't close it myself as I am now "involved"). In future, Freedomeagle, you need to go to Wikipedia:Requested moves. Neil ╦ 12:48, 1 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The above is an archived debate of the deletion review of the article above. Please do not modify it.

Brandon Davis – Resolved. – >Radiant< 14:56, 1 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The following is an archived debate of the deletion review of the article above. Please do not modify it.

Can it be redirected to Brandon Davis (heir) Looks like thats a legit article...? Freedomeagle 06:22, 1 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Comment What you're asking for should be "Can Brandon Davis (heir) be moved to Brandon Davis?" This is nothing but a move request, we don't need the community to rule on it. There may be a question of recreated content, however; I can't tell how different your new article is from the old. --Dhartung | Talk 06:27, 1 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Its not mine, I just found it, never even heard of the guy before. The regular non-heir one is locked up so I can't do it and I saw it was a deleted a zillion times.[4] Freedomeagle 06:31, 1 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry if this was the wrong section, where should I go?Freedomeagle 06:32, 1 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The entry that was deleted was about a professional wrestler called Brandon Davis. this one is the guy who has dated PAris Hilton. It's referenced well enough, asserts notability and so on, so I have moved it to Brandon Davis. I have moved this article to the new location, this can be closed (won't close it myself as I am now "involved"). In future, Freedomeagle, you need to go to Wikipedia:Requested moves. Neil ╦ 12:48, 1 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above is an archived debate of the deletion review of the article above. Please do not modify it.