Lauren Boobert – Summarily closed and delisted because no.—S Marshall T/C 18:08, 12 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The following is an archived debate of the deletion review of the page above. Please do not modify it.
Lauren Boobert (talk`\|`edit`\|`history`\|`logs`\|`links`\|`watch) (XfD`\|`restore) that editor is from Mississippi and is therefore biased in his delete. I need more time to make the case — Preceding unsigned comment added by 185.104.139.34 (talk) 23:26, 11 November 2023 (UTC)[reply] I'm not from Mississippi, or the South, and I hate her politics, but I'd have G10'd that too. To the point where I was awfully tempted to just close this (besides WP:DRVPURPOSE #8) instead of replying to it. —Cryptic 00:08, 12 November 2023 (UTC)[reply] Endorse the G10, so we don't have to address the close or the early close of the RFD. Robert McClenon (talk) 03:37, 12 November 2023 (UTC)[reply] This was a fairly straightforward application of Project:Biographies of living persons#Attack pages and Project:Redirect#Neutrality of redirects and Project:Criteria for speedy deletion#G10 by Star Mississippi. It wasn't really even ignoring the rules; because there they are. So, reviewing a speedy deletion: A quick look around indicates that no-one is legitimately going to be looking this up, and it serves no purpose to undelete. And yes, it's fairly clear that this is a time-wasting nomination. Uncle G (talk) 03:58, 12 November 2023 (UTC)[reply] Endorse my close. I'm not sure how needing more time translates into a two week delay/DRV filing, but that's neither here nor there, nor are whatever you assume to be my politics, IP 185. Thanks Uncle G for clarifying that it wasn't exactly IAR, but even if it were I'd still have made the same close. There is no justification for that redirect. Just because political discourse has gone into the toilet, it doesn't mean we need to do so here. Star Mississippi 13:55, 12 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above is an archive of the deletion review of the page listed in the heading. Please do not modify it.

Lauren Boobert – Summarily closed and delisted because no.—S Marshall T/C 18:08, 12 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The following is an archived debate of the deletion review of the page above. Please do not modify it.

that editor is from Mississippi and is therefore biased in his delete. I need more time to make the case — Preceding unsigned comment added by 185.104.139.34 (talk) 23:26, 11 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not from Mississippi, or the South, and I hate her politics, but I'd have G10'd that too. To the point where I was awfully tempted to just close this (besides WP:DRVPURPOSE #8) instead of replying to it. —Cryptic 00:08, 12 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Endorse the G10, so we don't have to address the close or the early close of the RFD. Robert McClenon (talk) 03:37, 12 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
This was a fairly straightforward application of Project:Biographies of living persons#Attack pages and Project:Redirect#Neutrality of redirects and Project:Criteria for speedy deletion#G10 by Star Mississippi. It wasn't really even ignoring the rules; because there they are. So, reviewing a speedy deletion: A quick look around indicates that no-one is legitimately going to be looking this up, and it serves no purpose to undelete. And yes, it's fairly clear that this is a time-wasting nomination. Uncle G (talk) 03:58, 12 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Endorse my close. I'm not sure how needing more time translates into a two week delay/DRV filing, but that's neither here nor there, nor are whatever you assume to be my politics, IP 185. Thanks Uncle G for clarifying that it wasn't exactly IAR, but even if it were I'd still have made the same close. There is no justification for that redirect. Just because political discourse has gone into the toilet, it doesn't mean we need to do so here. Star Mississippi 13:55, 12 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above is an archive of the deletion review of the page listed in the heading. Please do not modify it.