Since the precedent now is to have studio albums-based topics, I propose removal of all the other albums until somebody pushes the latest video one through GAN. Nergaal (talk) 03:24, 12 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Something has got to change, (sic)nesses' retention period of three months has past. This is a poor hack of a solution, but would be preferable over a full removal. Courcelles03:30, 12 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Why can't it just be discography? It's still a topic. Just because Nirvana Studio Albums is a topic doesn't mean that all other discography topics must be consistent to it. That would be a bit odd… CrowzRSA05:00, 12 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I'm pretty sure we have three options, 1)Reformulate it, possibly as proposed, 2)Work on and nominate (sic)nesses as a GA, 3)Delist the whole kit and caboodle. Courcelles05:23, 12 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Comment This whole topic needs to be updated. The Womens and World Tag Team titles are no longer active, and this topic is about current championships. Getting the Divas champions article to FL should be easy enough as its already in good condition. I can do it sometime later this week, unless someone wants to beat me to it. -- Scorpion0422II (Talk) 21:26, 28 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
O.k, so List of WWE Divas Champions is at FLC, that's a good start. Now, you mentioned that two of the championships are no longer active. Does that mean that they have to be removed from the topic? GamerPro64 (talk) 01:13, 9 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Is this topic about current champions or overall? I ask since the current is taken out of the title; if it is, those two that are defunct will need to be removed. If it's overall, then there are many that need adding. WizardmanOperation Big Bear02:03, 9 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The original definition was active championships, but the title was tweaked by various users until it omitted that vital bit. I assume that it is still the definition. -- Scorpion042203:02, 9 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The plot and characters sections have to be filled out, and that's basically the only thing keeping me from nominating it. It's sort of been on the backburner for a while, so that's why it's taking so long.--十八01:27, 13 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The GA nomination was closed as not successful. All that can be done at this time has been done at this time. On the plus side, 18 at least has this on the radar, so the chances for re-promotion are higher for this than for most. Sven ManguardWha?05:43, 20 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
This topic is already featured. It is being re-nominated to add additional items. See Wikipedia talk:Featured topics/My World for discussions of the topic's previous nominations. The additional items are:
I am adding the supplementary nomination with the additions of the new GA's of the remaining album tracks, "Bigger", "First Dance", and "Down to Earth", to add these to this current good topic. Candyo3214:49, 3 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Well considering the EP was sort of a precursor to 2.0, would it be safe to just include all the articles from both? Candyo3200:52, 7 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I don't know about that. Lady Gaga's The Fame is a good topic without The Fame Monster. And Ke$ha's Animal and Cannibal have the same separation. But the tour is for both for sure. -- ipodnano05 * leave@message06:17, 7 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Don't bundle the two albums into one topic; there would be no lead article. I will support this topic if you clean up My World Tour (it's not too bad at the moment) and get it peer reviewed (WP:FT? #3c. The Tour will need to be GA/FA by 21 August (3 months after conclusion). Adabow (talk · contribs) 06:33, 7 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I second his opinion for album merging. But I have to disagree and state that the tour is not is good or decent condition. It's missing a lot - A LOT. -- ipodnano05 * leave@message00:07, 8 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
If the tour article were to be PRed soon, then this topic would have until August 20 for the tour to become a GA. Without a PR, I think this additional nom will become a FTRC instead soon. Nergaal (talk) 01:29, 6 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
It can't be a GA yet, but that doesn't mean it should be ignored, since it will have to be added to the topic anyway, so might as well do it now. The tour end date has continued to change (a check last week had it as June 20, but i just checked and now it's July) WizardmanOperation Big Bear02:53, 22 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delist as featured topic. There are a large number of problems, not just with Trent Reznor. In fact, I'd almost suggest that Nine Inch Nails itself be delisted as a FA. It has a ton of dead links, some of which have been broken for almost two years. —Torchiesttalkedits17:21, 6 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The main article had nine dead links, I was able to fix five of then with 15 minutes work. I know nothing at all about this subject, but Reznor doesn't look impossible to fix. I'll give it a go rather than see an FT fall without a fight. Courcelles18:15, 12 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Go ahead and delist this. It's so far out of my knowledge base I don't even know what I don't know... and that's making too much work for me when I have too much on my plate. I'll try to bring it back without time pressures if I can. Courcelles09:22, 20 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
While it may have all the specific singles, why not all of the articles that are linked to under the track listing. They all have articles, thus should be part of this GT. --Admrboltz (talk) 02:45, 11 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I looked at all of the articles and I saw that Celebration and Revolver are exclusive to the album while the rest are from preivious albums (probably why its a greatest hits album). So, this topic is all complete. GamerPro64 (talk) 03:46, 11 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Articles can be part of multiple topics. The fact that an article is or would be in another topic does not mean that it should not be included if it is in the scope of the topic. Nergaal (talk) 04:30, 11 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delist A greatest hits album is about the hits! It does not make since to ignore most of the content of the topic. Zginder 2010-12-13T02:47Z (UTC)
I would tend to be towards keep, as GamerPro64 pointed out, not all the songs present from the album are singles from it. And why the hell weren't hte wikiprojects or the primary contributers notified of this? — Legolas(talk2me)05:02, 13 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Comment This is poor process. At the moment there is a greatest hits GTC taking place. As this discussion involves a change in precedent, why not take the all hits/only singles discussion there. And the fact that no-one was notified is shocking. Adabow (talk · contribs) 05:11, 13 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Ummm, not all of Madodnna's songs are singles from this greatest hits package. This nomination is absurd. It had two singles and a video. Keep Keep Keep.--CallMeNathan • Talk2Me05:17, 13 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Question for all those that vote keep: how does this topic pass criteria 1.d.:
There is no obvious gap (missing or stub article) in the topic. A topic must not cherry pick only the best articles to become featured together?
This topic is not titled "Singles from Celebration", so it should contain all the articles within the topic if they are notable enough to exist. Nergaal (talk) 05:25, 13 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Leaving asides the COI, is this an Overview topic? No. Then all the songs within its scope should be included per 1.d. The compilation sold not just because of the singles, but because of all the songs that were included. The singles reasoning sounds like saying that a TV season topic should only include the episodes that were heavily promoted, like those that were run right after the SuperBowl or around similar events, and exclude those that were not marketed in an unusual fashion. Nergaal (talk) 06:05, 13 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delist. This should not be considered a complete topic unless all of the songs on the album that are notable enough to have articles are at least GA status, not just the new songs on the album. A person reading this topic would want to learn about all of the songs on the album, not just the new ones. –Grondemar07:07, 19 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]