The following is an archived discussion of a featured article nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured article candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The article was promoted by SandyGeorgia 23:54, 3 October 2009 [1].


Brian Booth[edit]

Nominator(s): YellowMonkey (bananabucket) 05:13, 7 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Comprehensive article on Australian cricketer, who captained Australia twice. He also went to the 1956 Olympics in hockey, and is a lay preacher, retired education department official. YellowMonkey (bananabucket) 05:13, 7 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

tweaked. very carelless YellowMonkey (bananabucket) 06:47, 8 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
tweaked YellowMonkey (bananabucket) 06:47, 8 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I would think so, who would bring pads adn box but no bat, but the source doesn't mention anything else YellowMonkey (bananabucket) 06:47, 8 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
tweaked YellowMonkey (bananabucket) 06:47, 8 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
tweaked YellowMonkey (bananabucket) 06:47, 8 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
No, these 50s occurred on separate occasions, not in both innings of the same match YellowMonkey (bananabucket) 06:47, 8 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Oh, misread. Aaroncrick (talk) 07:05, 8 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
done YellowMonkey (bananabucket) 06:47, 8 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
No Hobart YellowMonkey (bananabucket) 06:47, 8 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Hitting the ball out the ground at he Domian is still no amazing feet. He would have only cleared, a small stand or a grass bank. Small boundaries as well. Not as if he was at the MCG/SCG. Aaroncrick (talk) 06:56, 8 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Feel free to cut it out. I'm not sure if Robinson had anything in mind in highlighting that one YellowMonkey (bananabucket) 07:01, 8 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Unless he hit it into the gale blowing off Mount Wellington brrr... Aaroncrick (talk) 07:05, 8 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
It's fine I think YellowMonkey (bananabucket) 06:47, 8 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Maybe, maybe not, but I reformulated the whole sentence anyway YellowMonkey (bananabucket) 06:47, 8 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Added YellowMonkey (bananabucket) 06:47, 8 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I don't think this is correct. YellowMonkey (bananabucket) 06:47, 8 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I think so, it shows his mindset YellowMonkey (bananabucket) 06:47, 8 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Aaroncrick (talk) 05:19, 8 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Well this is quite natural because he was a world-class cricketer, and while he was selected in Australia's hockey team, he never got to play. The other thing is that in the old days there was no regular first-class hockey season in Australia with interstate teams, unlike Australia, so basically nothing is written about them; there are basically no hockey history books sold in Australia, whereas with cricket there is a heap every year. As for his teaching, he would not have been notable for preaching, pedagogy or politics of itself. However I have managed to scrape out some more statistics about the 1974 election and a bit more about Booth to add. It is not necessary to add his family's names as they are private individuals. I think the RL part is quite ample, given that the "style" section is about his mixing of religion and sport. YellowMonkey (bananabucket) 06:47, 8 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
More subheaders added YellowMonkey (bananabucket) 06:53, 8 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Quickie comment: From the lead: "...had an inclination to use his feet to attack spin bowling." If I didn't know cricket I might think this meant he kicked the ball all over the place, as in soccer. It might be an idea to transfer this information to the main body of the article, where a short explanation could be added. Brianboulton (talk) 11:36, 8 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Twaking YellowMonkey (bananabucket) 06:46, 9 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Comments

The 169* came in 165 minutes (see the duration of the innings in CA). Hoare did not play in the match.
Fixed, and removed the beamer part, maybe Robbo got his wires crossed YellowMonkey (bananabucket) 06:46, 9 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Pakistan, 1956-7
Fixed and clarified. I notice almost everyone when discussing the loss to the WI as the first series loss (not counting one offs) YellowMonkey (bananabucket) 06:46, 9 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Not clear what you are trying to say here Tintin 15:41, 8 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Tweaked YellowMonkey (bananabucket) 06:46, 9 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Support - See no problems except the ones raised by Tintin. They should be fixed soon. Aaroncrick (talk) 23:40, 8 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Yup, thanks for reminding YellowMonkey (bananabucket) 00:26, 11 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Otherwise, sources look okay, links checked out with the link checker tool. Ealdgyth - Talk 17:43, 11 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Psephos is run by User:Adam Carr, now retired but a legend of Wikipedia in the 2006 and before era. Apparently it is the biggest archive of electoral results in the world. He was a political official of Michael Danby and his archive was usually sourced everywhere all over Wikipedia, so most people accept, although for these purposes it might not be the best even though he just copied them from teh official govt log somewhere, which I'll try to track down YellowMonkey (bananabucket) 01:24, 14 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
AC has a PhD in history and the site is also endorsed by any academic on its own wiki article Psephos YellowMonkey (bananabucket) 01:26, 14 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I'll leave this out for other reviewers to decide for themselves. Ealdgyth - Talk 13:47, 14 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Subs are not allowed in cricket once the toss has been done. The source doesn't say explicitly, but Morris and Watson would have become unavailable on the morning of the match before the toss, but after Booth had gone to work and they would have had to phone him up to come to cricket. Except that would have taken some time because the toss is normally half an hour before the start. YellowMonkey (bananabucket) 02:25, 14 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Is emergency used commonly like this in cricket? If so, don't worry about it. That just confused me the first time I saw it. Giants2008 (17–14) 00:16, 25 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Fixed the rest YellowMonkey (bananabucket) 02:25, 14 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Provisional support pending resolution of the one sourcing concern. Bear in mind that I don't know if all the cricket terms are correct, even after reading numerous FACs in the subject area. Most everything appears in order, besides the one thing mentioned multiple times already. Giants2008 (17–14) 23:09, 28 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Comments

Fixed YellowMonkey (bananabucket) 01:20, 16 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Fixed YellowMonkey (bananabucket) 01:20, 16 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Fixed YellowMonkey (bananabucket) 01:20, 16 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
After Booth was out they scored 98 in 110 minutes. Reasonably fast I think, considering the calibre of bowling England had at the time. YellowMonkey (bananabucket) 01:20, 16 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Fixed the two above YellowMonkey (bananabucket) 01:20, 16 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
An image reviewer Jappalang has come to the conclusion that PD-Australia doesn't work on US soil unless they are pre-1946, so I comment those out when it comes to FAC YellowMonkey (bananabucket) 01:20, 16 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

--Jpeeling (talk) 21:20, 15 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I have been remiss but I have a copy of Booth's autobiography Booth to Bat so if YellowMonkey (or whoever) is after added info (such as Booth's parents' names), I can supply. --Roisterer (talk) 03:17, 17 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks, info added YellowMonkey (bananabucket!) 04:45, 23 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
done YellowMonkey (bananabucket) 01:29, 28 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks! All images check out. Awadewit (talk) 16:59, 28 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • I am not an expert in cricket sources, so I cannot say if these are high-quality cricket sources, but I can say that they meet our WP:RS policy, with the exception of the one I mention below.
  • I agree with Ealdgyth above that the Psephos site is a problem. It needs to be replaced - I don't see a reasoning provided that would make this a RS.
  • In response to the question about the commented out images, YM wrote "An image reviewer Jappalang has come to the conclusion that PD-Australia doesn't work on US soil unless they are pre-1946, so I comment those out when it comes to FAC" - Does this mean that he adds the images back after FAC? I'm a bit concerned here.
Not at all. No. These pictures were added before he told me that the template doesn't work, so I just comment them out at the FAC. None have come back, by me or by anyone else YellowMonkey (bananabucket) 04:01, 29 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Like the IP above, I was surprised about the lack of information on other aspects of Booth's life, but I take it from YM's response that there is little info available. I accept that.
Well he was famous for being a world-level sportsman and not a world-level pedagogue or preacher. YellowMonkey (bananabucket) 04:01, 29 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I will be happy to support this article once the source issue is cleared up. Awadewit (talk) 19:19, 28 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I'll email the owner of Psephos to ask what page the Vic election results came from YellowMonkey (bananabucket) 04:01, 29 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks - I now have a herniated disk and cannot promise to keep responding here in a timely fashion. I will leave it up Ealdgyth and other reviewers to decide the source issue at this point. Awadewit (talk) 19:15, 30 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
No reply, so removed that part. Will try and find it in hard print later YellowMonkey (bananabucket) 01:31, 1 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.