The following is an archived discussion of a featured article nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured article candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The article was promoted 20:06, 28 November 2007.


Hurricane Ioke[edit]

After working on it for about a month, I believe this article is now ready for featured article candidacy. It is well-written, comprehensive (I spent great amounts of time to find key information, such as the damage total), factually accurate (every statement is referenced with the Cite Web template), it is neutral, and it's stable (I've been the primary editor over the past while). It has a concise lead, appropriate sections, free images, and it's length is appropriate. I'll address any comments/concerns. Hurricanehink (talk) 16:24, 25 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Is there anything else actionable I can do before this is promoted to FA? Hurricanehink (talk) 22:43, 21 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Do the rain dance. Titoxd(?!? - cool stuff) 01:36, 22 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Support. Article is thorough, imaged and sourced fully. Another job well done by hink. I fully support passing.Mitch32contribs 01:38, 28 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Pass & support. On the basis that this is quality, unlike many other on this FAC, and much like the other hurricane-related article you worked on. Great. Leranedo 03:24, 29 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

--maclean 05:49, 24 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for reviewing (really! It's been on FAC for over a month and this is the first real comment). I got most of that (including changing the "well to the southeast" to "far to the southeast"). Regarding the Cattle Network, yes, it was one of the few sites I found that reports rainfall from Ioke affecting Alaska, and yes, it is mm. The <div style="clear:both;"></div> is just a substituted version of Template:Clear. I don't think anything can be done regarding "annoying that the capital i/I and the lower case L/l look the same in this font". Everything else I got. Hurricanehink (talk) 17:22, 24 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
What more is needed? I changed "well to the southeast" to "far to the southeast", the measurement is in mm, there's nothing I can do about i/I and l/L, and I split the reference to two pages. Hurricanehink (talk) 21:32, 24 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support. Sorry, I had to leave, wasn't finished. They were minor points really. I don't expect anything on the i/L thing, it is just a comment. The Cattle Network is not ideal as a source but I guess it will do until something better can be found - but I would like to remove the word "record" from "...including daily rainfall records of..." which makes it sound like the rainfall was a record-breaking event. What do you think of "The system produced moderate to heavy precipitation across the western portion of Alaska, including daily rainfalls of 1.15 inches (29 mm) at Bethel and 0.67 inches (17 mm) at Kotzebue."? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Maclean25 (talkcontribs)
Oh, ok. Those rainfall amounts were records, though, for daily precipitation, which I think should be mentioned. It doesn't matter too much, and if you think its implication is skewed as it is, you can remove the word "record". Hurricanehink (talk) 01:05, 25 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured article candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.