The article was promoted 20:06, 28 November 2007.
After working on it for about a month, I believe this article is now ready for featured article candidacy. It is well-written, comprehensive (I spent great amounts of time to find key information, such as the damage total), factually accurate (every statement is referenced with the Cite Web template), it is neutral, and it's stable (I've been the primary editor over the past while). It has a concise lead, appropriate sections, free images, and it's length is appropriate. I'll address any comments/concerns. Hurricanehink (talk) 16:24, 25 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support. Article is thorough, imaged and sourced fully. Another job well done by hink. I fully support passing.Mitch32contribs 01:38, 28 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Pass & support. On the basis that this is quality, unlike many other on this FAC, and much like the other hurricane-related article you worked on. Great. Leranedo 03:24, 29 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
--maclean 05:49, 24 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]