The following is an archived discussion of a featured article nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured article candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The article was not promoted by SandyGeorgia 12:30, 27 September 2010 [1].


Jocko Thompson[edit]

Jocko Thompson (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Nominator(s): — KV5Talk • 18:09, 22 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I am nominating this for featured article because I believe that it meets the criteria. In the period of time since this passed its good article nomination, I have done additional research on this player and have not found any further information beyond what's currently in the article. Thus, I believe it to be complete, fully referenced, and of featured quality. This is my second go-round through the FA process (my first try was a dismal failure), and I'm hoping that this one turns out well; if passed, it would obviously be my first successful FAC. I'll try to address all comments as expediently as possible. Thanks in advance to all reviewers. — KV5Talk • 18:09, 22 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Comment. No problems with dablinks. ; the external link to http://gonu.com/baseball/archives/results.htm produces "We're sorry, the page you are looking for cannot be found." PL290 (talk) 19:15, 22 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - My Google search of Phil Nordyke's More Than Courage, a history of the 504th, shows that Thompson is mentioned about a dozen times. My copy is in storage, but I seem to remember he's mentioned in some detail. Have you looked at this source? If not, I don't think this is comprehensive as of yet. Skinny87 (talk) 19:39, 22 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

(od) Hey, no problem - I'd have had the exact same problem in reverse if I'd tried to get this to FA. I'll see what I can dig up in the next week or so, no worries. Skinny87 (talk) 13:11, 24 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Otherwise, sources look okay, links checked out with the link checker tool. Ealdgyth - Talk 14:25, 24 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Image review: Military award images are verifiably in the public domain. The bridge photo is appropriately licensed. Jocko is dead and conceivably there can be no free replacement available unless someone releases their shot into the public domain. Possibilities include John Comier's photos and bubble gum cards[2][3] if Bowman Gum had failed to renew the copyright registrations. Regardless, the fair use (to identify a dead subject and who is unlikely to have a public domain photo) is likely appropriate. Jappalang (talk) 22:49, 24 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

All right, go ahead and withdraw the nomination. As always, my work doesn't seem to be FA caliber. — KV5Talk • 12:23, 27 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]


The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.