The article was promoted 00:58, 26 February 2008.
User:Kariteh brought this article up to standard but it didn't pass for some reason. Regardless, it meets all the criteria, is well written, comprehensive, and deserving of the FA star. Judgesurreal777 (talk) 19:21, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose:
A good start, but too many problems currently. I feel that the article needs quite a large change in direction before becoming FA. Thanks. Ashnard Talk Contribs 20:05, 14 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I'll answer each question individually:
Thanks. Ashnard Talk Contribs 18:50, 15 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Ok, here's what I did;
Thanks for your notes! Judgesurreal777 (talk) 04:13, 16 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I'll have to agree with Guy here. When comparing this article to e.g. Final Fantasy and The Legend of Zelda (series), I must say IMHO that latter's games sections look a lot neater. But that's just a preference, and no good reason to vote oppose. Overall, the article is quite good. 21:19, 25 February 2008 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by The Prince of Darkness (talk • contribs)