The article was not promoted by SandyGeorgia 18:38, 21 December 2011 [1].
The Constant (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Toolbox |
---|
I am nominating this for featured article because... widely considered the best episode of Lost, the article was edited to also be along the best Lost articles on Wikipedia (after all, it has many examples to follow). Hope the FA manages to be as successful as Desmond's search on how to revert getting "unstuck in time". Thank you, namaste, and good luck. igordebraga ≠ 12:15, 29 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: The link to FAC on the article's talkpage has not been completed properly. Also, in the lead I read "whether it is possible to avoid paradox in time travel is debatable." This opinion needs attribution as well as citation, 1.e. whose opinion is it? I don't see any follow-up on this issue in the main article text, either. Brianboulton (talk) 15:22, 29 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Source review - spotchecks not done. Nikkimaria (talk) 15:31, 29 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Nikkimaria (talk) 15:31, 29 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Comments from Noleander
Oppose. There are many problems with this article, not least of which is that it's almost incomprehensible to a non-fan. Here are a few examples:
Malleus Fatuorum 03:46, 18 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]