The article was removed by YellowAssessmentMonkey 00:47, 1 September 2009 [1].
Toolbox |
---|
I am nominating this featured article for review primarily because of 1c concerns. It was promoted to FAC in January 2007
There are also 1d concerns; for example, there are some promotion quotes included in the article from those that are selling it, but none from the scientific community giving an unbiased view.
Regards, —Mattisse (Talk) 22:23, 28 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Comment. Done; thanks. The two images need alt text as per WP:ALT. Eubulides (talk) 05:49, 29 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Reply from original FA nominator - Hello, I am the author that worked this article through the original FA and I will try to address the remarks above.
Best, Johntex\talk 00:03, 30 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
To Johntex: it was unhelpful of you to remove the dead link/verification needed tags from the (live) article. This is a wiki where many users collaborate to improve the content. If you leave the tags in place, other editors (including myself) would find it easier to find and correct the highlighted problems. Axl ¤ [Talk] 19:06, 30 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
—Mattisse (Talk) 00:49, 6 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]