• The paragraphs in the lead are very short, particularly the first two.
• I agree with the above that the lead would be better if longer.
• In such a short article, 'National Paralympic Committee' only needs to be linked once.
• 'Track and field' and 'athletics' are not the same (the former is part of the latter). Any reason 'athletics' links to 'track and field' rather than 'athletics (sport)'?
• The general ref and refs 1 and 6 need endashes.
• File:Paralympic certificate.jpg is not a free image, as the copyright is held by the organizers of the event. It has been uploaded to the Commons under what seems to be a fake license. I have nominated it for speedy deletion there, and it should also be removed from this article unless it can be proven that it has either been released by a free license, or that it can be used under appropriate fair use (either of which I doubt is possible).
• Article is categorized in Category:1968 Summer Paralympics, and does not need to be in Category:Sports festivals in Israel, as it is indirectly categorized there.
• Why is the article in Category:1968 in Canada?

Otherwise looks good. Arsenikk ^(talk) 18:18, 15 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• I'm sure it's been mentioned before, but a lead image would be great.
• "are an international multi-sport event " .. "are ... an event" reads odd to me.
• "compete and ..." compete against one another?
• "the most gold medals, with 33, and most total medals, with 99" -> perhaps "most golds, with 33, and most in total, with 99" to avoid three-peating "medals".
• "won a total of 62 medals" don't think you need "a total of" here (repeats total from previous line).
• You link various sports in the table section but not in the lead, why?
• "represented by a National Paralympic Committee" already abbreviated this, so just "NPC" would be fine.
• When sorting by gold in descending order, why would Netherlands (12 g, 4 s) rank ahead of West Germany (12 g, 4s)? Similar for Canada/Rhodesia.
• Ref 4 could use a page number (p 93 I think, not 94 as Google suggests).

The Rambling Man (talk) 12:33, 21 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your suggestions. An image would be great—the one we had previously was deleted from commons as it was unloaded on an incorrect license— but I can't find a freely available one and don't know if File:Tel Aviv 1968 Paralympics.jpg could be used under fair-use? Personally I think "are an international multi-sport event" is ok, similar wording is used at Olympic Games which got through FA criteria (it would be different if refering to a single Paralympic Games). All the "sports" (athletics etc) are linked, it's the individual events (discus etc) that aren't. I've made the other changes; you're right on the sorting issue but I can't yet work out how to fix it, similar problems seem to exist in a lot of the Olympic medal tables article. I'll try and work it out - Basement12 (T.C) 22:39, 21 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I've struck out my reply on the sorting as I don't think it really matters - when doing that you are intentionally sorting by gold only, all nations on the same amount are equal regardless of silver/bronze medals so the order in which they appear bears no significance. Thoughts? - Basement12 (T.C) 22:47, 21 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I think the sorting needs to be sorted. May need some clever use of the ((sort)) template though. The Rambling Man (talk) 10:09, 22 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Think I've found a way around it using ((Hs)) and a hidden alphabetical sort key for every item in the table. It's a bit fiddly and might not have been the easiest way but it seems to do the job - Basement12 (T.C) 11:54, 22 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]