The list was promoted by Dabomb87 23:41, 22 June 2010 [1].
List of FC Barcelona players (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Toolbox |
---|
I am nominating this for featured list, I already have one list at FLC with all content-comments adressed, a question of title remains. Given that consensus of proper title is formed at an ad-hoc basis in the FLC proces, I'd like to nominate this list which follows the format of List of Ipswich Town F.C. players especially regarding the inclusion criteria (with some modifications, but the principle is the same). An RfC has begun on the WT:FOOTY#Name of football player lists page regarding proper naming. It was recently through peer review, all comments at previous FLC has been adressed. Sandman888 (talk) 07:45, 14 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Comments which will have to be brief, because I have no internet access for a couple of weeks after today so won't be able to address any matters arising. I'll have to leave it to the FL directors to decide whether anything mentioned here is actionable, and if it is, whether it's been actioned acceptably. Their decisions are fine by me.
cheers, Struway2 (talk) 21:35, 8 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Comment. This deserves proper scrutiny, although my initial reaction is that it's nearly there.
My only initial gripe is with the inclusion of Rodrigez and Ibrohimovic (and any others who only qualify through a club record that I've missed). From reading the (lengthy) discussion at WT:FOOTY I've come to the conclusion that the legends are acceptable. It's a clearly defined group, and it's possible to include all of them indiscriminately, which is one of my main concerns at FL. On the other hand, it's impossible to say that you have covered every single record. I don't have a problem with listing records as footnotes, but I don't think a record alone should qualify a player to be included. The players in question will still get the recognition they deserve here, and there is the chance that they'll reach 100 appearances or be recognised as legends in future, and qualify that way.
I hope to give this a proper review, but given my (lack of a) recent contribution history I can't make any promises. Best of luck either way. WFCforLife (talk) 05:12, 11 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Resolved comments from Wizardman Operation Big Bear 23:51, 21 June 2010 (UTC)[reply] |
---|
*Comment: I checked a couple references and they were fine, and I'll check the statistically-based ones on a second read through. Here are a couple things I found:
Wizardman Operation Big Bear 16:07, 20 June 2010 (UTC)[reply] |