The list was promoted by Scorpion0422 22:12, 2 June 2009 [1].
Toolbox |
---|
After working on this for about a week, I think it's pretty much ready. There's a few redlinks, but they should be blue by the end of the nomination. Lede section may be a bit long for some. If that's the case I can shift some of it over to London Marathon, which is a bit anemic in well referenced statements. Matthewedwards : Chat 04:04, 16 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Resolved comments from Chrishomingtang
|
---|
Comment
—Chris! ct 04:35, 16 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
|
Comments - on lead prose
—Preceding unsigned comment added by Rambo's Revenge (talk • contribs) 21:37, May 16, 2009 (UTC)
Comments – Nice one. Only a couple of things I saw stuck out at me:
--Crzycheetah 05:19, 19 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Support, all issues resolved. Dabomb87 (talk) 22:13, 29 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Resolved issues, Dabomb87 (talk) |
---|
Comments from Dabomb87 (talk · contribs)
|
Sources look good. Dabomb87 (talk) 02:02, 23 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Any progress forthcoming on the text size? I'm inclined to support otherwise. Giants2008 (17-14) 23:12, 28 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Review by Truco (talk · contribs)
--Truco 15:49, 30 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Resolved comments from The Rambling Man (talk) 08:49, 31 May 2009 (UTC)[reply] |
---|
*Very weak oppose - I fixed a cell without an edge in one of the tables, and I made a (better?) categorisation from "Marathoning" to "Marathons in England" (two levels more specific category). I think you're missing one of the other "major" marathons in your "See also" section, and I would consider a template maybe? Does everyone know what a "pub" is? Also, you could increase the size of the lead image? And a description of what the difference between "Elite" and non-"Elite" would be useful, incorporating info that states they set off first, with all the crazy gang afterwards. But real close to support. The Rambling Man (talk) 18:13, 30 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
|