Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 1 Jun 2022 at 10:17:11 (UTC)
Reason
A fantastic photograph from World War II of a valiant Maori soldier, and the lead image in a featured article. I do like improving the images in featured articles where possible.
Support – Should the dark patch in the sky be removed (top right corner)? The top half of his ear is darker than the bottom half, and there is darker shade in the sky as well along a diagonal line. Should it be improved? Bammesk (talk) 03:44, 24 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Honestly, I presumed he was in or against the wall of a tent or something, and that was a fabric fold. Natural shadows can look a little weird. Adam Cuerden(talk)Has about 7.8% of all FPs08:06, 24 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I suppose we could crop a bit from the top, though. It's not quite clear if that's natural or an artefact of the camera. Adam Cuerden(talk)Has about 7.8% of all FPs10:34, 24 May 2022 (UTC) It looked worse.[reply]
Aye, a good guide for this kind of thing is to see if they cross boundaries. The lines behind him (even in the unrestored original) stop instantly when they reach him, which is evidence against them being artefacts. There is a shadow on the ear that does slightly line up, but it's different in appearance. (and, frankly, coincidental lines are ridiculously common in photos). Adam Cuerden(talk)Has about 7.8% of all FPs00:04, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]