The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Kept - Peripitus (Talk) 22:34, 9 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Facial symmetry in dogs.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Outriggr (notify | contribs).

• OR, UE, LQ, use not stated. FASTILY_sock^(TALK) 00:56, 4 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep...unique, expressive and irreplaceable symbol of both absurdity and humor...Modernist (talk) 04:04, 4 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep...what Modernist said, but with humour spelt differently. Used occasionally on my user page, a use for which there is some leeway despite the plethora of initials that now pass for deletion arguments. Yomangani^talk 14:10, 4 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep, because I can't decipher the deletion rationale. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 19:04, 4 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment - His abbreviations mean orphaned, unencyclopedic, and low quality.--Rockfang (talk) 20:12, 4 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment - The image is currently in use, currently encyclopedic, and unique...Modernist (talk) 12:41, 5 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep; a limited amount of latitude is allowed to established users for personal images and content for their userspace. Stifle (talk) 09:47, 8 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Zscout370 (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 05:03, 5 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:A10n1esp-1.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Renemunez33 (notify | contribs).

• OR, UE, LQ, use not stated. FASTILY_sock^(TALK) 00:56, 4 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Keep. Jafeluv (talk) 12:26, 28 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:PulpFictionTwist.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by DCGeist (notify | contribs).

• Image is not necessary to understand the film. No sources provided to discuss the notability or significance of this image itself. ÷seresin 01:21, 4 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Blatantly false (complainant appears to simply misunderstands our NFC policy, as well). Multiple sources are adduced in support of relevant critical commentary:

• Waxman, Sharon (2005). Rebels on the Backlot: Six Maverick Directors and How They Conquered the Hollywood Studio System (New York: HarperCollins), p. 71 . ISBN 0-06-054017-6.
• Laverick, Daniel. "Selling a Movie in Two Minutes—The Modern Day Film Trailer". Close-Up Film.
• Charyn, Jerome (2006). Raised by Wolves: The Turbulent Art and Times of Quentin Tarantino (New York: Thunder's Mouth Press), p. 106. ISBN 1-56025-858-6.

Of course, one must actually make the effort to read through the article to encounter all of the critical commentary that the image explicates.—DCGeist (talk) 03:16, 5 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I did read the article, but your entirely benign remark about my competency is appreciated. My point about critical commentary still stands; the commentary must show that the image itself is significant, not the scene it depicts. Raising the Flag on Iwo Jima is a significant image; The Blue Marble is a significant image; Guerrillero Heroico is a significant image. This image has no sources discussing the significance of this exact image. (Consider that another still depicting the same scene would also make the same point you were seeking to make with this image. If that is the case, this image cannot be not special.) My other point also still stands: text explicating (to borrow your ten-dollar word) that the two danced and an image explicating that they danced both impart the same information. When this is the case, a FU image is unjustified. ÷seresin 03:09, 10 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This is at best, deep ignorance; at worst, pure sophistry (please feel free to price that word). The image explicates the extensive critical commentary on the famous scene. There is no free image that exists or could be created that can do so. "This exact image" is (a) a nonsensical standard and (b) one that has no basis in our policy. Your parenthetical underscores the vacuity of your argument—because the famous scene lasts for more than a single frame, according to your illogic, no single frame may be used to illustrate it. That is absurd. Your irrelevant comparisons to unique photographs merely underscores your misunderstanding of the field at hand. Cinema history, criticism, and analysis—which you appear to be completely unfamiliar with—is not based on the discussion of "exact images", but on scenes and images that extend over time and multiple frames. Apparently you are unaware that there are 24 distinct frames to every second of projected film; thus your devotion to the bizarre misconception that encyclopedic discourse on a film relies on "exact images". In fact, I made no comment about your competency before, but your latest emission both raises and answers that question.—DCGeist (talk) 06:51, 12 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You are conflating two issues. The first is that if an image itself (not the scene, the actual image) is significant, a FU image may be justified. This is true regardless of medium. My reference to unique photographs is just that—those images themselves are significant, not only the scenes they depict. In this instance, the film still itself is not significant—but the scene is. My parenthetical was to show that use of another still of this scene would provide the same illustrative purpose, no one particular still is more significant than another; so this one can't be significant in this context. The commentary you allude to discusses the scene, not any particular image. So that potential justification for a FU image is null. The second issue is NFCC8, which stipulates that lack of a FU image in an article must be detrimental to the readers' understanding. This is a pretty clear point, as readers do not need an image to understand that the two danced. ÷seresin 07:35, 12 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Comment. The test is whether the image adds significantly to reader understanding. That can remain possible, even if there are other alternate non-free images which could equally have been used to add to understanding in a similar way. For example, there are any number of publicity pics or screengrabs which could be used to show Captain James T. Kirk. That doesn't take away from the fact that using one such image in that article does indeed add to user understanding. Jheald (talk) 09:33, 12 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Exactly. Seresin, I'm afraid, has confused matters. Our guideline pertaining to acceptable image use should help explain that there is a difference between the category of specific "Images with iconic status or historical importance" (like the unique photographs seresin has raised in, it must be said, irrelevant comparison) and the category of "Film and television screen shots", which by the nature of the media will in virtually all cases be examples illustrative of longer scenes (or of recurrent motifs). As for what is being illustrated, of course it goes well beyond the mere fact that two people danced. How did they look as they danced? What sort of poses did they strike? How were they dressed? These are matters crucial to an understanding of the scene that the image significantly aids us in understanding. Given the well-sourced fame and importance of the scene, the image clearly meets our 8th NFC criterion. DocKino (talk) 23:52, 13 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Keep, per DocKino's convincing argumentation. Doc9871 (talk) 06:56, 14 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• Neutral to Keep. I think DocKino's comment above summarises the issues accurately. That said, under "What sort of poses did they strike?", I would have thought the "pulling the fingers across in front of the eyes" move was the best known, most distinctive trademark pose in the scene. I would also prefer the image caption to make the point, right where the image is used, that the scene has become iconic (and suggest why), preferably with page-specific references (and maybe even one-line pull quotes cited in the references) to support this, since DCGeist (above) appears to have such material to hand. But nevertheless, this is universally recognised to be an iconic scene from the movie, so showing how it looked does indeed add something valuable and significant to reader understanding. Jheald (talk) 11:25, 14 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• On the choice of image: I certainly considered the possibility of using an image showing the fingers-across-the-eyes move. However, an analysis of the sequence reveals that there is no frame that shows both characters doing so—or even shows both characters while one or the other does it. Travolta/Vincent does it with two fingers in close-up, the camera pans, and then Thurman/Mia does it with all five fingers, again in close-up. Both to honestly represent the scene and to respect the letter and spirit of NFCC 3a, I believe it's essential to use an image that shows both characters in dance action. In addition, while we can be sure on an anecdotal basis that the finger move is the best known element of the scene, most of the WP:V-standard sources that discuss the scene and its iconic status do not specify that gesture, but discuss the dance as a whole.
• On sourcing of scene's status: I'm a bit confused. The image's caption currently includes, and has long included, a cited quote from a high-quality source, including page reference, describing it as the film's "famous dance scene". The scene is widely discussed in the literature, of course, and it would be easy to add further quotes to the caption from high-quality sources describing it as "iconic" or "timeless", but is that necessary or desirable? Recall that further down in the article there is sourced commentary on homages to the scene and extensive critical analysis of it.—DCGeist (talk) 16:55, 14 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• While inflating the caption doesn't seem desirable, what I've done is expand the citation with a page-referenced quote from another high-quality source describing it as an "iconic scene".—DCGeist (talk) 18:28, 19 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Angusmclellan (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 00:01, 17 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:PulpFictionColors.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by DCGeist (notify | contribs).

• Image is not necessary to understand the film. No sources provided to discuss the notability or significance of this image itself. ÷seresin 01:22, 4 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• Tendentious, injudicious argument for deletion. Source is clearly and directly adduced to discuss significance of Willis' physical appearance in character: Dargis, Manohla (1994). "Pulp Instincts/Quentin Tarantino on Pulp Fiction", Sight & Sound vol. IV, no. 5 (May). Collected in Quentin Tarantino: Interviews, ed. Gerald Peary (Jackson: University Press of Mississippi, 1998). ISBN 1-57806-051-6. Image is evidently judiciously chosen to focus on Willis's physiognomy and physical bearing in accordance with sourced critical commentary.—DCGeist (talk) 03:03, 5 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - There is almost no mention in the article of his appearance and I cannot see what significant understanding this image gives to me as a reader. - Peripitus (Talk) 21:01, 5 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep Throughout the article, from the lead through the entire primary text, there is extensive critical commentary on the centrality of cinematic allusion to Tarantino's conception of the film. In the case of the casting of the role of the boxer Butch Coolidge, it is clear that Willis's appearance was crucial to Tarantino in exactly this regard: "Tarantino said, 'Bruce has the look of a 50s actor. I can't think of any other star that has that look.'" The image is extremely significant to the readers' understanding of that statement in particular and Tarnatino's vision in general, as discussed in the article. DocKino (talk) 16:39, 7 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete, decorative fair use, image not the subject of critical commentary. Stifle (talk) 09:48, 8 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• It's rather difficult to engage in an intelligent, productive discussion when editors make blatantly false statements. "Decorative" means "purely ornamental", but the informational purposes served by the image have been explicated at length, and are readily apparent to anyone who actually reads the article. DCGeist (talk) 13:56, 8 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment Obviously, this is another motion to delete based on the nominator's misunderstanding of our policy and relevant guidelines, as the argument keyed to "this image itself" clearly reveals. As with any commercial live-action film, an understanding of what the star or stars look like in character is essential to an understanding of the film. This is, of course, especially true when the film's auteur is motivated by allusion to cinema history and specifically articulates how important his star's appearance is in relation to that cinema history. DocKino (talk) 00:43, 14 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Materialscientist (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT⚡ 01:01, 8 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:My Saint Anselm Ring 2010 (1).JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Ericci8996 (notify | contribs).

• OR, UE, use not stated, possible CV. FASTILY_sock^(TALK) 01:23, 4 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Do Not delete this image, there is no reason, I took it myself, SOMEONE HELP ME OUT WITH THIS PLEASE --Ericci8996 (talk) 16:47, 4 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• Might be a derivative work, if the ring itself is considered an artistic creation (and was first designed after 1923). Why not add a paragraph to the Saint Anselm College article, and discuss its significance? Then it could no longer be considered "unencyclopedic". Jheald (talk) 17:34, 5 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thank You Jheald for that idea... I will add a paragraph immediately... also, the image has now been moved to Commons! Thus It should be "de-nominated" for deletion :)

Hello again, I have added that paragraph detailing history about the shield design... Please make sure this and the other images, (b/c they are all moved to commons now...) are NOT deleted!! --Ericci8996 (talk) 22:39, 6 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

--Ericci8996 (talk) 22:08, 6 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - per WP:CSD#F8.--Rockfang (talk) 23:18, 7 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Materialscientist (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT⚡ 01:01, 8 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Student Ambassador.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Ericci8996 (notify | contribs).

• OR, UE, use not stated, possible CV. FASTILY_sock^(TALK) 01:23, 4 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Do Not delete this image, there is no reason, I took it myself, SOMEONE HELP ME OUT WITH THIS PLEASE --Ericci8996 (talk) 16:48, 4 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• Move to Commons. Categorise there under Saint Anselm College. Jheald (talk) 17:12, 5 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thank You Jheald for that idea... it has now been moved to Commons! Thus It should be "de-nominated" for deletion :) --Ericci8996 (talk) 22:09, 6 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - per WP:CSD#F8.--Rockfang (talk) 23:20, 7 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Nyttend (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT⚡ 01:01, 8 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Alumni Hall 1889 Sun.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Ericci8996 (notify | contribs).

• OR, UE, use not stated, possible CV. FASTILY_sock^(TALK) 01:23, 4 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Do Not delete this image, there is no reason, I took it myself, SOMEONE HELP ME OUT WITH THIS PLEASE --Ericci8996 (talk) 16:48, 4 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• Move to Commons. Categorise there under Saint Anselm College. Jheald (talk) 17:12, 5 January 2010 (UTC

Thank You Jheald for that idea... it has now been moved to Commons! Thus It should be "de-nominated" for deletion :)

--Ericci8996 (talk) 22:09, 6 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - per WP:CSD#F8.--Rockfang (talk) 23:24, 7 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Nyttend (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT⚡ 01:01, 8 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Alumni Hall 1889 dark.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Ericci8996 (notify | contribs).

• OR, UE, use not stated, possible CV. FASTILY_sock^(TALK) 01:23, 4 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Do Not delete this image, there is no reason, I took it myself, SOMEONE HELP ME OUT WITH THIS PLEASE--Ericci8996 (talk) 16:46, 4 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• Move to Commons. Categorise there under Saint Anselm College. Jheald (talk) 17:12, 5 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thank You Jheald for that idea... it has now been moved to Commons! Thus It should be "de-nominated" for deletion :)

--Ericci8996 (talk) 22:09, 6 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - per WP:CSD#F8.--Rockfang (talk) 23:26, 7 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT⚡ 00:01, 10 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Alumni Hall 1889 SNOW.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Ericci8996 (notify | contribs).

• OR, UE, use not stated, possible CV. FASTILY_sock^(TALK) 01:23, 4 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Do Not delete this image, there is no reason, I took it myself, SOMEONE HELP ME OUT WITH THIS PLEASE --Ericci8996 (talk) 16:46, 4 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• Move to Commons. Categorise there under Saint Anselm College. Jheald (talk) 17:12, 5 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thank You Jheald for that idea... it has now been moved to Commons! Thus It should be "de-nominated" for deletion :) --Ericci8996 (talk) 22:11, 6 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Nyttend (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT⚡ 01:01, 8 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Alumni Hall 1889 RAIN.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Ericci8996 (notify | contribs).

• OR, UE, use not stated, possible CV. FASTILY_sock^(TALK) 01:23, 4 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Do Not delete this image, there is no reason, I took it myself, SOMEONE HELP ME OUT WITH THIS PLEASE --Ericci8996 (talk) 16:47, 4 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• Move to Commons. Categorise there under Saint Anselm College. Jheald (talk) 17:12, 5 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thank You Jheald for that idea... it has now been moved to Commons! Thus It should be "de-nominated" for deletion :)

--Ericci8996 (talk) 22:10, 6 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - per WP:CSD#F8.--Rockfang (talk) 23:29, 7 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: local copy deleted. The image is now available at File:St Anselm College, Alumni Hall, 15 December 2007.jpg on Wikimedia Commons. Angus McLellan (Talk) 20:48, 16 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:ALUMNI HALL in 12-15-2007.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Ericci8996 (notify | contribs).

• OR, UE, use not stated, possible CV. FASTILY_sock^(TALK) 01:23, 4 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Do Not delete this image, there is no reason, I took it myself, SOMEONE HELP ME OUT WITH THIS PLEASE --Ericci8996 (talk) 16:47, 4 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• Move to Commons. Categorise there under Saint Anselm College. Jheald (talk) 17:12, 5 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thank You Jheald for that idea... it has now been moved to Commons! Thus It should be "de-nominated" for deletion :)

--Ericci8996 (talk) 22:10, 6 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:03, 13 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Abujarange.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Kehz99 (notify | contribs).

• OR, UE, LQ, use not stated. FASTILY_sock^(TALK) 01:37, 4 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 22:10, 5 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Accent with Logo.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by ElectricOne (notify | contribs).

• OR, UE, LQ, use not stated, possible CV. FASTILY_sock^(TALK) 01:38, 4 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: keep. Angus McLellan (Talk) 21:27, 16 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Account creation.PNG (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Dodoïste (notify | contribs).

• OR, UE, LQ, use not stated. FASTILY_sock^(TALK) 01:38, 4 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

  Thanks for pointing out this issue. I do not understand what "OR, UE, LQ, use not stated" means, but I'm willing to help. Could someone explain it to me? Basically, this file was used to show a usability issue with the signup form on the village pump/technical. Should I provide a link to the history of the MediaWiki messages used in the form, which contains the list of authors? What about the licence, is CC-by-sa 3.0 OK? Yours, Dodoïste (talk) 18:09, 4 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Files for deletion#Glossary -FASTILY ^(TALK) 21:29, 4 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. So, here is your answer:

1. OR ----> As explained, it was useful to demonstrate a lack of usability, not to be used in an article.
2. UE ----> It was never meant to be, of course. Such screenshots are proven useful in debates, therefore I do not understand why being unencyclopedic is such a problem.
3. LQ ----> Just how is that relevant for a screenshot?
4. use not stated ----> I stated it above.

Now if you have some real concerns, I will be glad to hear them. If not, I have other things to take care of. Yours, Dodoïste (talk) 03:00, 5 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This is being used at the Village Pump. User:Zscout370 ^{(Return Fire)} 04:04, 5 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hmmmm...it is a useless media file. Frankly, I don't see anything special about it whatsoever. Regardless, assuming what you said is true, I could go to Special:createaccount and simply take another screenshot or better, direct users there when the issue comes up in a debate (assuming it ever will). To top it off, the file is only used in an archive - althuogh you might be someone who does, in my experience, most people tend not to look in archives. Only drawback to that is that you might see the same question pop up rather frequently on the relevant noticeboard. And unfortunately, there's not much you can do about it. -FASTILY ^(TALK) 04:57, 5 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The whole purpose of the debate was to improve the signup form, which was done successfully. Thus, the signup form has changed, I can't simply take another screenshot. If we are to keep the archive, there is no point in deleting the image. Dodoïste (talk) 23:42, 5 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep - No valid rationale for deletion has been given. Also, the file is being used in a lengthy, archived village pump discussion.--Rockfang (talk) 06:01, 5 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep - This image is not causing any problem, so there is no reason for deleting it. It may be useful as an archive. Dodoïste (talk) 23:42, 5 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 06:05, 13 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Acetoneiso-2.0.3.svn.png (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Bulletxt (notify | contribs).

• OR, UE, LQ, use not stated, possible CV. FASTILY_sock^(TALK) 01:40, 4 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: keep. Angus McLellan (Talk) 21:28, 16 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Acetonidegroups.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by John Riemann Soong (notify | contribs).

• OR, UE, LQ, use not stated. FASTILY_sock^(TALK) 01:40, 4 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Was used in an RD question. I don't know if you really want to make the reference desk archives ugly... John Riemann Soong (talk) 04:18, 4 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep - Image was used in a reference desk discussion.--Rockfang (talk) 06:04, 5 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep, perfectly usable PD image of a known compound. Could be useful in discussions of sugar organic chemistry and protecting groups. Tim Vickers (talk) 17:19, 12 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 06:05, 13 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Acres per Car 2008 0120.PNG (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Georgeiiird (notify | contribs).

• OR, UE, LQ, use not stated. FASTILY_sock^(TALK) 01:40, 4 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: keep. Not orphaned, not unencyclopedic. Angus McLellan (Talk) 21:39, 26 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Quadrants.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Northerncedar (notify | contribs).

• OR, UE, LQ, use not stated. FASTILY_sock^(TALK) 01:43, 4 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • DO NOT DELETE --- Essential for the understanding of Mohs surgery vs ccpdma vs. breadloafing --Northerncedar (talk) 03:05, 5 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: keep. Not orphaned, not unencyclopedic. Angus McLellan (Talk) 21:39, 26 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Mohs surgery 1Pacman.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Northerncedar (notify | contribs).

• OR, UE, LQ, use not stated. FASTILY_sock^(TALK) 01:43, 4 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • DO NOT DELETE --- Essential for the understanding of Mohs surgery vs ccpdma vs. breadloafing --Northerncedar (talk) 03:07, 5 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: keep. Not orphaned, not unencyclopedic. Angus McLellan (Talk) 21:39, 26 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Mohs surgery 2Pacman.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Northerncedar (notify | contribs).

• OR, UE, LQ, use not stated. FASTILY_sock^(TALK) 01:43, 4 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • DO NOT DELETE --- Essential for the understanding of Mohs surgery vs ccpdma vs. breadloafing --Northerncedar (talk) 03:05, 5 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: keep. Not orphaned, not unencyclopedic. Angus McLellan (Talk) 21:39, 26 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Margin Controlled Bread Loaf.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Northerncedar (notify | contribs).

• OR, UE, LQ, use not stated. FASTILY_sock^(TALK) 01:43, 4 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • DO NOT DELETE --- Essential for the understanding of Mohs surgery vs ccpdma vs. breadloafing --Northerncedar (talk) 03:06, 5 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: keep. Not orphaned, not unencyclopedic. Angus McLellan (Talk) 21:39, 26 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Bread loafing.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Northerncedar (notify | contribs).

• OR, UE, LQ, use not stated. FASTILY_sock^(TALK) 01:43, 4 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • DO NOT DELETE --- Essential for the understanding of Mohs surgery vs ccpdma vs. breadloafing --Northerncedar (talk) 03:06, 5 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: keep. Not orphaned, not unencyclopedic. Angus McLellan (Talk) 21:39, 26 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:FalseNegativeBreadLoaf.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Northerncedar (notify | contribs).

• OR, UE, LQ, use not stated. FASTILY_sock^(TALK) 01:43, 4 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • DO NOT DELETE --- Essential for the understanding of Mohs surgery vs ccpdma vs. breadloafing --Northerncedar (talk) 03:06, 5 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: keep. Not orphaned, probably not unencyclopedic although it makes less sense than the others to me. Angus McLellan (Talk) 21:39, 26 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Smash Pie Pan.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Northerncedar (notify | contribs).

• OR, UE, LQ, use not stated. FASTILY_sock^(TALK) 01:44, 4 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • DO NOT DELETE --- Essential for the understanding of Mohs surgery vs ccpdma vs. breadloafing --Northerncedar (talk) 03:07, 5 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: keep. Not orphaned, not unencyclopedic. Angus McLellan (Talk) 21:39, 26 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Mohsflattening2.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Northerncedar (notify | contribs).

• OR, UE, LQ, use not stated. FASTILY_sock^(TALK) 01:44, 4 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • DO NOT DELETE --- Essential for the understanding of Mohs surgery vs ccpdma vs. breadloafing --Northerncedar (talk) 03:07, 5 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 07:06, 13 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Acueductogdl.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Chokolate (notify | contribs).

• OR, UE, LQ, use not stated. FASTILY_sock^(TALK) 01:46, 4 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 07:06, 13 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Adidas Dynamo Day 15.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Danmarinker (notify | contribs).

• OR, UE, LQ, use not stated. FASTILY_sock^(TALK) 01:48, 4 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: local copy deleted. Now available on Commons as File:Admin Building, California State University, Chico.JPG. Angus McLellan (Talk) 20:55, 16 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:AdminBuilding.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by ChicoLinguist (notify | contribs).

• OR, UE, use not stated. FASTILY_sock^(TALK) 01:48, 4 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Move to Commons (and perhaps rename more meaningfully). Categorise there under California State University, Chico. Jheald (talk) 17:39, 5 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: The result of the discussion was Withdrawn. -FASTILY_sock^(TALK) 03:32, 4 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Admiral of the Indian Navy rank flag.svg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Zscout370 (notify | contribs).

• OR, use not stated, possible CV. FASTILY_sock^(TALK) 01:48, 4 January 2010 (UTC) Withdrawn. -FASTILY_sock^(TALK) 03:32, 4 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • The file was intended for use at the Flag of India article. I drew the image myself, but according to guidelines, I had to post the construction sheet of the flag so others can see. User:Zscout370 ^{(Return Fire)} 02:00, 4 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: local copy deleted. Now on Commons. Angus McLellan (Talk) 20:59, 16 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Adoor Gopalakrishnan.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Dhvraju (notify | contribs).

• OR, UE, use not stated. FASTILY_sock^(TALK) 01:48, 4 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep and move to commons. The subject is Adoor Gopalakrishnan and, although this image has poor technical quality, I can see that cleaned up and cropped it could be quite useful. - Peripitus (Talk) 21:18, 5 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 07:06, 13 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Aerialbridge.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Shipguy9 (notify | contribs).

• OR, UE, LQ, use not stated. FASTILY_sock^(TALK) 01:49, 4 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 07:06, 13 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Aelogo black on blue.png (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Pickbothmanlol (notify | contribs).

• OR, LQ, AU, OB, use not stated. FASTILY_sock^(TALK) 01:51, 4 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 14:09, 18 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Aetoi.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Koliri (notify | contribs).

• OR, UE, use not stated. FASTILY_sock^(TALK) 01:51, 4 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 07:06, 13 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Africa Club Minsk.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Dmitrywithc (notify | contribs).

• OR, UE, LQ, use not stated. FASTILY_sock^(TALK) 01:51, 4 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 14:09, 18 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Africa blank map2.svg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Cradel (notify | contribs).

• OR, UE, LQ, use not stated, OB. FASTILY_sock^(TALK) 01:52, 4 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 07:06, 13 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:AggregatedRobots.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Sergkorn (notify | contribs).

• OR, UE, LQ, use not stated. FASTILY_sock^(TALK) 01:54, 4 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 07:06, 13 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Agitated cell reactor.png (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Echis (notify | contribs).

• OR, UE, LQ, use not stated. FASTILY_sock^(TALK) 01:55, 4 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT⚡ 13:08, 18 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:AguereberryPoint-view.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Tomdonohue1 (notify | contribs).

• OR, use not stated. Keep if someone can find a home for it. FASTILY_sock^(TALK) 01:55, 4 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Keep The image needs a home, but it is certainly worthy of a place here. Its just a question of where to make use of it. Else, move to commons. - ʄɭoʏɗiaɲ ^τ _¢ 03:06, 4 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 07:06, 13 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Caseydnaiel.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Caseyd8i8 (notify | contribs).

• Vanity free image. MBisanz ^talk 02:03, 4 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 07:06, 13 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Koliri fires.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Koliri (notify | contribs).

• OR, UE, use not stated. FASTILY_sock^(TALK) 02:04, 4 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 07:06, 13 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Geniki1.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Koliri (notify | contribs).

• OR, UE, use not stated. FASTILY_sock^(TALK) 02:05, 4 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 13:08, 18 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Manitaria.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Koliri (notify | contribs).

• OR, UE, use not stated. FASTILY_sock^(TALK) 02:05, 4 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 13:08, 18 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Topio5.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Koliri (notify | contribs).

• OR, UE, use not stated. FASTILY_sock^(TALK) 02:05, 4 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 07:06, 13 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Agios nikolaos2.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Koliri (notify | contribs).

• OR, UE, use not stated. FASTILY_sock^(TALK) 02:05, 4 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 07:06, 13 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Liostasia.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Koliri (notify | contribs).

• OR, UE, use not stated. FASTILY_sock^(TALK) 02:05, 4 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 07:06, 13 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Uphill.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Koliri (notify | contribs).

• OR, UE, use not stated. FASTILY_sock^(TALK) 02:05, 4 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: keep. Angus McLellan (Talk) 21:31, 26 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Peukakia.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Koliri (notify | contribs).

• OR, UE, use not stated. FASTILY_sock^(TALK) 02:06, 4 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep - is not orphaned and according to the article it is near the greek village of Koliri and shows regeneration after the 2007 wild fires. - Peripitus (Talk) 11:59, 18 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 13:08, 18 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ahads constant public domain image.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Sitara12 (notify | contribs).

• OR, LQ, use not stated. FASTILY_sock^(TALK) 02:06, 4 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 07:06, 13 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ahmad Syahri Rizqi Haqqi.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by As zoravan (notify | contribs).

• OR, UE, LQ, use not stated. FASTILY_sock^(TALK) 02:06, 4 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 07:06, 13 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Air India Flight.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Viral2094 (notify | contribs).

• OR, UE, LQ, use not stated. FASTILY_sock^(TALK) 02:08, 4 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 07:06, 13 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Airport Ísafjörður.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Fahrschein (notify | contribs).

• OR, UE, LQ, use not stated. FASTILY_sock^(TALK) 02:08, 4 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:02, 12 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Airinternationalva.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Pedrodiogo (notify | contribs).

• OR, LQ, use not stated, possible CV. FASTILY_sock^(TALK) 02:10, 4 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 07:06, 13 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Airpressureonvenus.svg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Blacklemon67 (notify | contribs).

• OR, use not stated. FASTILY_sock^(TALK) 02:10, 4 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 07:06, 13 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Air-show.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Weboperator (notify | contribs).

• OR, UE, LQ, use not stated. FASTILY_sock^(TALK) 02:18, 4 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 07:06, 13 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:450px-Novi Beograd - West Gate 03.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Weboperator (notify | contribs).

• OR, UE, LQ, use not stated. FASTILY_sock^(TALK) 02:18, 4 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 07:06, 13 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:06Barry.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Yolopd (notify | contribs).

• Image is unencyclopedic and not being used.The article it is was originally used on now uses a different image. Lәo_(βǃʘʘɱ) 02:57, 4 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: keep until moved to Commons (PNG-ised version there now, but no JPEG). Has been tagged. Angus McLellan (Talk) 21:37, 16 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Aisha.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Gurdjieff (notify | contribs).

• OR, UE, LQ, use not stated. FASTILY_sock^(TALK) 03:01, 4 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• I am author of this image I added the info and removed the delete tag hope that is ok —Preceding unsigned comment added by Gurdjieff (talk • contribs)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 07:06, 13 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ajay Lakum.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Ajayexpert (notify | contribs).

• OR, UE, LQ, use not stated. FASTILY_sock^(TALK) 03:01, 4 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 07:06, 13 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Akademiksmens2.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by AgainstAllOddsUSA (notify | contribs).

• OR, UE, LQ, use not stated. FASTILY_sock^(TALK) 03:01, 4 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 07:06, 13 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Akd sanjay yeo.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Ajaydata (notify | contribs).

• OR, UE, LQ, use not stated. FASTILY_sock^(TALK) 03:01, 4 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 07:06, 13 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Akeanon sanag1.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Kaliboaklan (notify | contribs).

• OR, UE, LQ, use not stated. FASTILY_sock^(TALK) 03:01, 4 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Future Perfect at Sunrise (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 11:06, 11 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Thedoorssep1968.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Doc9871 (notify | contribs).

• Disputed fair use. As much as I appreciate The Doors and this image, we already have File:The Doors band members.jpg, making this one obsolete as a fair use image. ʄɭoʏɗiaɲ ^τ _¢ 03:01, 4 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep, certainly on principle. Response. A) I am not trying to make this page into a fan site by adding copious images, and b) one image alone does not an article make; how does one posed publicity shot not allow for a picture of the band in, say, a casual atmosphere, or better yet, performing together? A picture from their beginning vs. the last known picture of them together? One picture makes all others obsolete? WP:NFCC 3(a) is not that strictly worded to say that one image excludes all others... Doc9871 (talk) 04:21, 4 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

What it reads is Multiple items of non-free content are not used if one item can convey equivalent significant information.

I do not feel that this image conveys anything significant that the other image does not. - ʄɭoʏɗiaɲ ^τ _¢ 07:50, 4 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your opinion is just as valuable as any other editor's, which is what makes WP great. To apply two deletion tags within a short time, without even attempting to reach consensus before doing so, and to still not address the key points I queried above; this is what WP is not. I've got my "tentacles" out already on this one, and if I am wrong (according to the administration), I will comply with them. Good day to you! Doc9871 (talk) 08:08, 4 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Like I mentioned, this is where I originally intended to bring it. - ʄɭoʏɗiaɲ ^τ _¢ 19:22, 4 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• Weak keep - I think that a case could be made that this image conveys a different tone or shows a different side of the band than the promotional shot frequently used. Lәo_(βǃʘʘɱ) 01:21, 5 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, standard WP:NFCC#1 violation. Stifle (talk) 09:50, 8 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment - "Standard" WP:NFCC#1 on what grounds specifically? Doc9871 (talk) 10:30, 8 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
    • Sorry, should have been #3a (multiple fair use images being used to identify the band when one would suffice). Stifle (talk) 21:16, 8 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• One of the images must be deleted per Stile's 3A point. I would choose one that is neither this image nor the one we currently have, as both are substandard if we're going to use an FU image. Until we find a better one though, one of these two should be used, and it must be the other one as source information on this one is wholly invalid. ÷seresin 04:02, 10 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment - Please explain what a non-"substandard" FU image of The Doors is. What is standard, and what is substandard? Please explain... Doc9871 (talk) 10:53, 10 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Purely on an aesthetic and composition level, I mean. The current image has a lot of shadows that function artistically, but do not really aid in understanding how the subjects appear. Substandard was a poor choice of words, as it implies I was referencing some sort of policy; I apologize. ÷seresin 14:03, 10 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: The result of the discussion was Withdrawn.

File:Akdeniz.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Nedim Ardoğa (notify | contribs).

• OR, UE, LQ, use not stated. FASTILY_sock^(TALK) 03:06, 4 January 2010 (UTC). Withdrawn. -FASTILY ^(TALK) 21:19, 4 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:02, 12 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Akeanon sanag3.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Kaliboaklan (notify | contribs).

• OR, UE, LQ, use not stated. FASTILY_sock^(TALK) 03:06, 4 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 00:00, 6 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Akon1.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by ESARASOOL (notify | contribs).

• OR, UE, LQ, use not stated. FASTILY_sock^(TALK) 03:07, 4 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:03, 13 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:104B0990.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Moondog419 (notify | contribs).

• Low quality image, not being used. User made two uploads and an edit in 2006. Image is unlikely to find a use. Lәo_(βǃʘʘɱ) 03:07, 4 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 07:06, 13 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Al-trust17.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by [[User talk:#File:Al-trust17.jpg listed for deletion|]] ([ notify] | contribs).

• OR, LQ, use not stated, possible CV. FASTILY_sock^(TALK) 03:08, 4 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 07:06, 13 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Black Squirrel in Washington State.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Moondog419 (notify | contribs).

• Low quality image, not being used. User made two uploads and an edit in 2006. Image is unlikely to find a use. Lәo_(βǃʘʘɱ) 03:09, 4 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 07:06, 13 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:AlShaab1234.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Nms725 (notify | contribs).

• OR, LQ, use not stated, possible CV. FASTILY_sock^(TALK) 03:09, 4 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 07:06, 13 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Geyikkosan.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Chawol (notify | contribs).

• OR, UE, LQ, use not stated. FASTILY_sock^(TALK) 03:10, 4 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:02, 12 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:116x131px-james schmidt 2006.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Jsschmidt24 (notify | contribs).

• Unencyclopedic image only used by a user treating his userpage like a resume. Lәo_(βǃʘʘɱ) 03:13, 4 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 07:06, 13 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Alan Kirby on cover of Digimodernism.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Mifachispa96 (notify | contribs).

• OR, UE, LQ, use not stated. FASTILY_sock^(TALK) 03:16, 4 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT⚡ 12:15, 22 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Alandowney.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Jackpollock (notify | contribs).

• Very UE, LQ, use not stated. FASTILY_sock^(TALK) 03:17, 4 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep ??????? - Yes the image is poor but it is used in an article on the subject. We keep free images that are used in articles, unless there is a compelling reason not to. "use not stated" is not really on the money - Peripitus (Talk) 11:54, 18 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 07:06, 13 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Alaverdi131.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Kevorkmail (notify | contribs).

• OR, UE, LQ, use not stated. FASTILY_sock^(TALK) 03:17, 4 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 07:06, 13 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Alaverdi stad2.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Kevorkmail (notify | contribs).

• OR, UE, LQ, use not stated. FASTILY_sock^(TALK) 03:19, 4 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 07:06, 13 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Alazharuniversity.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Ahmadvns (notify | contribs).

• OR, UE, LQ, use not stated. FASTILY_sock^(TALK) 03:19, 4 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: keep and move to Commons. I simply do not see the sense of nominating images here which could be profitably moved to Wikimedia Commons. To my mind this is not LQ or UE and OR is not a stick with which to beat editors into moving images to Commons RIGHT NOW. Angus McLellan (Talk) 01:49, 7 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Albert Gallatin Tomb at Trinity Church in New York City IMG 1710.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Billy Hathorn (notify | contribs).

• OR, UE, LQ, use not stated. FASTILY_sock^(TALK) 03:19, 4 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I can't imagine what the fuss here is about. It is a picture of the tomb of Albert Gallatin in Trinity Cemetery at Trinity Church in NYC.Billy Hathorn (talk) 04:28, 5 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 07:06, 13 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Albinoracoon.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Jm51 (notify | contribs).

• OR, UE, LQ, use not stated. FASTILY_sock^(TALK) 03:20, 4 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 07:06, 13 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Alero-OSV-9.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by C2comics (notify | contribs).

• OR, UE, LQ, use not stated. FASTILY_sock^(TALK) 03:22, 4 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 07:06, 13 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Alero-OSV-6.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by C2comics (notify | contribs).

• OR, UE, LQ, use not stated. FASTILY_sock^(TALK) 03:22, 4 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 07:06, 13 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Alero-OSV-5.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by C2comics (notify | contribs).

• OR, UE, LQ, use not stated. FASTILY_sock^(TALK) 03:22, 4 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 07:06, 13 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Alero-OSV-3.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by C2comics (notify | contribs).

• OR, UE, LQ, use not stated. FASTILY_sock^(TALK) 03:22, 4 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 07:06, 13 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Alero-OSV-1.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by C2comics (notify | contribs).

• OR, UE, LQ, use not stated. FASTILY_sock^(TALK) 03:23, 4 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 13:08, 18 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Alex Franciosi.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Jonno316 (notify | contribs).

• OR, UE, LQ, use not stated. FASTILY_sock^(TALK) 03:23, 4 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Not orphaned and use is fairly obvious from the image link. The sandbox draft never get into article space, but then again, perhaps it will. Angus McLellan (Talk) 21:41, 16 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 07:06, 13 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Alexander Tennant's House, Cape Town.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Askarii (notify | contribs).

• OR, UE, LQ, use not stated. FASTILY_sock^(TALK) 03:26, 4 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 07:06, 13 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Alexandra-Burke-280 900606a.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Curlz07 (notify | contribs).

• OR, UE, LQ, use not stated, likely CV. FASTILY_sock^(TALK) 03:27, 4 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 07:06, 13 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Alexcandar.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Alexcandar (notify | contribs).

• OR, UE, LQ, use not stated. FASTILY_sock^(TALK) 03:27, 4 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 07:06, 13 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:145aa5a6.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Xtreme100 (notify | contribs).

• Unencylopedic image, not being used, the only action of the uploader was uploading this image, and there isn't a use stated. Lәo_(βǃʘʘɱ) 03:28, 4 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 07:06, 13 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:156amw-1-.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Robeter (notify | contribs).

• Unused image, no description or use stated, uploader has been gone since 2008. Lәo_(βǃʘʘɱ) 03:33, 4 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 07:06, 13 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:16mm Ear Strech Without Plug.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Ash man04 (notify | contribs).

• Low quality image, not being used, uploader has been absent since 2007 Lәo_(βǃʘʘɱ) 03:39, 4 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 07:06, 13 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:19) Snowman, Christmas night.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by EamonnPKeane (notify | contribs).

• Not being used, not a very good example of what it portrays, no other possible use. Lәo_(βǃʘʘɱ) 03:44, 4 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 07:06, 13 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:19c6119543.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Breeanzz (notify | contribs).

• Unused image, no possible use, only action by uploader, and uploader seemingly only to direct attention to (presumably) uploader's site. Lәo_(βǃʘʘɱ) 04:01, 4 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 07:06, 13 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:4thavenuecropped.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Calliopejen1 (notify | contribs).

• Orphaned and redundant to http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Fourth_Avenue_Theatre.jpg Rockfang (talk) 09:08, 4 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Future Perfect at Sunrise (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 10:05, 11 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Holdenastracolours.png (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Aaaaplay (notify | contribs).

• A scan from a Holden Astra brochure staff training book, even if it had fair-use added in the summary section this is replaceable with free-use images by getting photographs of cars on the street or a dealership. Bidgee (talk) 11:04, 4 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: deleted, speedily under F9. I'm quite convinced that this was a scanned image from an "Osprey" book. Angus McLellan (Talk) 16:45, 4 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Parthian cataphracts.svg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Persia2099 (notify | contribs).

• First, the image is not an svg, but a gif. Second, cameras cannot possibly output transparency, so there is no way this was taken with a camera, and, in light of that, it may be a copyright violation, unfortunately, I cannot check as I can't open the image up to see the full resolution without getting an xml error. Also, if you will see the talk page of the user who uploaded this image, you will see that they've uploaded copyrighted images before, so I wouldn't be surprised if this was one as well. Even if it was originally taken by a camera, then edited, it would still be a copyright violation. — Dædαlus ^Contribs 12:49, 4 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Future Perfect at Sunrise (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 10:05, 11 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Bas relief of Hormizd II.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Persia2099 (notify | contribs).

• The file metadata here does not match the details given by the uploader. Angus McLellan (Talk) 17:02, 4 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Future Perfect at Sunrise (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 10:05, 11 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Statue of Shapur I Bishapur.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Persia2099 (notify | contribs).

• Again file metadata does not match the details supplied by the uploader. Angus McLellan (Talk) 17:04, 4 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Melesse (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 13:06, 7 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Flowergrazer.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by DeathScythe00 (notify | contribs).

• Size Error DeathScythe00 (talk) 17:05, 4 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.