The result of the discussion was: No Consensus. -FASTILY (TALK) 00:55, 27 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The license states that this artwork is "ineligible for copyright" because it has "no original authorship". As a work of fine art, I believe despite its simple nature, IKB 191 meets the threshold of originality due to the choice of medium etc, and thus is eligible for copyright. The work of art is still copyrighted in the EU and the US, as 70 years have not passed since the author's death. Xijky (talk) 00:18, 19 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
On the copyrightability issue, it's a blue rectangle. That's it. Classifying it as "fine art" does not change its place in copyright law, and I don't see what "choice of medium" (it's a painting; that's its medium) has to do with originality here, so you'll have to do better than that at explaining why you think it passes the threshold of originality. It's possible that as a physical object there is more to it in person, but as embodied in this image, it is just an uncopyrightable blue rectangle. postdlf (talk) 04:41, 19 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
First, if a photograph of a copyrighted work doesn't reproduce any copyrightable elements of that work, then it's not a "copy" such that it could constitute infringement if fair use did not apply. It isn't enough just to "reproduce" or "copy." "The [copyright infringement] plaintiff must show that the defendant copied protectible — that is, copyrightable — expression." Cohen, J., et al. (2002) Copyright in a Global Information Economy, pp. 353-54. You're failing here by viewing the "work" as an indivisible thing, but in any case of a copyrighted work, there are aspects of it that are copyrightable and aspects that aren't. Id., p. 65. ("copyright protection does not attach to every element of a work."). In this case, the painting's shape obviously is not copyrightable even though that is part of the work, nor are its dimensions, nor is its color of blue because you can't copyright a color. So even assuming the painting is copyrightable, if a photograph of it does not actually copy copyrightable elements then it is not a non-free "copy" within the meaning of copyright law, even though it is still literally a photograph of the painting. As for whether such a photograph is informationally valuable to the article, that's really a matter for editors to decide: is it enough to show the painting's color and dimensions, if finer details of it are not legible? The Yves Klein article currently describes the IKB paintings as "uniformly coloured" (contra your descriptions above), though with varying surface textures because of the differing methods of applying paint. Not really a lot to hang your hat on.
Second, you also claim that those copyrightable elements are visible in the painting, but I disagree. If you did not know that a painting was the origin of that blue rectangle, I doubt you or anyone else would claim that it was copyrightable. And that's what we care about on Wikipedia: is the image we are using copyrightable, which as I explained in point one is a separate question from whether the subject of the image is copyrightable (and obviously if the photograph is not copyrightable, it did not copy anything copyrightable from the painting).
So let's get some other opinions on whether File:IKB 191.jpg is copyrightable. postdlf (talk) 21:52, 21 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 27 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
user's uploads are all random low-res images (at least one historic, at least one verified copyvio, and many images previously deleted at PUI) tagged as PD-self or GFDL-self but without any stated source. varying small resolutions, no metadata, some have borders. this one, with the crease in the middle, looks like a photo in the book. one of his uploads at commons is credited to two other people. my guess is that these are just random pics from around the internet Calliopejen1 (talk) 01:14, 19 November 2011 (UTC) Also nominating the following images:[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 27 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The uploader gives no reason for us to believe this is encyclopedic. Magog the Ogre (talk) 02:22, 19 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F8 by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 27 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
orphaned doggie pic - no target article or encyc use Skier Dude (talk) 03:07, 19 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 27 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
orphaned user image; no add'l encyc use Skier Dude (talk) 03:19, 19 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 27 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
This is a declined disputed fair use, which I in turn am turning to FFD (I am neutral; this is procedural). I declined it because I could not immediately verify the statement given by the disputer, User:Uniplex. His reasoning was: Fails WP:NFCC#8, as "not the primary means of visual identification: the work had no cover art; this image is of an obscure reissue." Magog the Ogre (talk) 03:20, 19 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; none of the keep !votes adequately refute the nominator's position and explain why the logo is in line with WP:NFCC, and WP:NFCC#8 in particular. -FASTILY (TALK) 01:01, 27 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Picture fails the non-free content criteria, as the article in which this picture is used as about the general concept of the game scrabble and not the product produced by Hasbro, Inc. Armbrust Talk to me about my editsreview 03:58, 19 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Withdraw nomination. (NAC Armbrust Talk to me about my editsreview 13:22, 24 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Picture fails the non-free content criteria, as the article in which this picture is used as about the general concept of the game scrabble and not the product produced by Hasbro, Inc. Armbrust Talk to me about my editsreview 03:59, 19 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Withdraw nomination. (NAC Armbrust Talk to me about my editsreview 13:23, 24 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Picture fails the non-free content criteria, as the article in which this picture is used as about the general concept of the game scrabble and not the product produced by Mattel, Inc. Armbrust Talk to me about my editsreview 03:59, 19 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 27 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
orphaned user-space image; no other encyc use Skier Dude (talk) 04:02, 19 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 27 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
OR, LQ, too small to be useful Skier Dude (talk) 04:04, 19 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 27 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
orphaned user-space image Skier Dude (talk) 04:06, 19 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: DELETE. Image was uploaded for article deleted at AFD (see discussion here). postdlf (talk) 16:52, 23 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
orphaned user-created logo; no target article Skier Dude (talk) 04:39, 19 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 27 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
OR personal image, no encyc use Skier Dude (talk) 04:57, 19 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: DELETE; uploaded for long-ago speedy deleted vanity page. postdlf (talk) 05:18, 19 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
orphaned user image; no foreseen encyc use Skier Dude (talk) 05:05, 19 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 27 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
orphaned user image, no other encyc use Skier Dude (talk) 05:16, 19 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:02, 27 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
No indication that this is the official logo. Uploader claims own work, and the website for the channel is "coming soon". Fan-made logos are not acceptable. Sven Manguard Wha? 10:05, 19 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 27 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Orphaned, insufficient permission (seems to be wikipedia-only) Calliopejen1 (talk) 14:54, 19 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 27 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Calliopejen1 (talk) 14:55, 19 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 27 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Orphaned, likely copyvio (in a blog entry here two years before upload date) Calliopejen1 (talk) 14:57, 19 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 27 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Calliopejen1 (talk) 14:58, 19 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 27 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Calliopejen1 (talk) 14:58, 19 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 27 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Calliopejen1 (talk) 15:53, 19 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 27 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Orphaned, superseded by File:Map highlighting Hahnaman Township, Whiteside County, Illinois.svg Calliopejen1 (talk) 15:54, 19 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 27 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
this scene is misidentified as hai phong theater. probably it's somewhere else in hai phong but probably best to delete because we don't really know what it is. Calliopejen1 (talk) 15:55, 19 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 27 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Orphaned, unclear encyclopedic value, no OTRS to verfiy that uploader is copyright holder Calliopejen1 (talk) 15:56, 19 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 27 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
photo of copyrighted mural, no freedom of panorama in the united states Calliopejen1 (talk) 16:01, 19 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 27 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Calliopejen1 (talk) 16:02, 19 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 27 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Orphaned, photo of copyrighted sign, no freedom of panorama in the united states Calliopejen1 (talk) 16:02, 19 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 27 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Orphaned, Unencyclopedic (Toy Singers) Calliopejen1 (talk) 16:07, 19 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 27 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Orphaned, no source for data Calliopejen1 (talk) 16:09, 19 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 27 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Orphaned, Unencyclopedic (unidentified site in haiti - not really useful) Calliopejen1 (talk) 16:11, 19 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 27 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Orphaned, Low quality Calliopejen1 (talk) 16:12, 19 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 27 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Orphaned, doesn't seem to be accurate based on what's in Military aircraft insignia Calliopejen1 (talk) 16:14, 19 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 27 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Orphaned, unclear encyclopedic value Calliopejen1 (talk) 16:16, 19 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:02, 27 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Too much going on in such a small image. With a collage of thirty photos jammed into a 480x270 space, one is hard-pressed to actually be able to decipher anything meaningful out of it. Additionally, while the series are all listed near this picture, the picture is not necessary for the discussion, as the appearance of each team is not discussed (WP:NFCC#8). SchuminWeb (Talk) 16:46, 19 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F9 by Nyttend (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 15:09, 22 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Orphaned, likely copyright violation Calliopejen1 (talk) 16:54, 19 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 27 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Orphaned, Low quality, no stated source, we have better images[3] Calliopejen1 (talk) 16:58, 19 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: No Consensus. -FASTILY (TALK) 01:03, 27 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Fails WP:NFCC#8 for lack of discussion in the article on the mugshots themselves. The fact that Hendrix was arrested for drugs, sure, that's important, but the mugshots are neither discussed in the article, nor themselves the subject of sourced commentary, nor otherwise significant to understanding that Hendrix was arrested for drugs. SchuminWeb (Talk) 17:10, 19 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 27 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Orphaned, not good quality, unclear encyclopedic value, could easily be recreated if needed in the future Calliopejen1 (talk) 17:13, 19 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 27 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Orphaned, superseded by File:Map highlighting Hale Township, Warren County, Illinois.svg Calliopejen1 (talk) 17:14, 19 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 27 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
photo of pucks with various copyrighted logos prominently on them Calliopejen1 (talk) 17:18, 19 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 27 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Orphaned, photo of copyrighted statue Calliopejen1 (talk) 20:32, 19 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as G7 by Malik Shabazz (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 00:01, 20 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
error uploading file nsaum75 !Dígame¡ 20:34, 19 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:02, 27 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Orphaned, superseded by SVG Calliopejen1 (talk) 20:38, 19 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 27 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Orphaned, insufficient description, appears to have something to do with Shri Gaudapadacharya Math but was not immediately added to an article after uploading Calliopejen1 (talk) 20:46, 19 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Deletion ? It is a picture of one of the branches of Shri Gaudapadacharya Math. If you feel it needs to be deleted, go ahead. since it is a ancient branch, makes sense to be on the main page of the Math. Ashok Prabhu (Talk)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 27 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Orphaned, not very good quality, unidentified speaker, unclear how this could ever be useful Calliopejen1 (talk) 20:50, 19 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 27 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Orphaned, unclear encyclopedic value, web-resolution, no stated source apart from boilerplate Calliopejen1 (talk) 21:02, 19 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 27 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Calliopejen1 (talk) 21:06, 19 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 27 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Calliopejen1 (talk) 21:06, 19 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 27 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Orphaned, unverifiable source for data Calliopejen1 (talk) 21:06, 19 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 27 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Calliopejen1 (talk) 21:07, 19 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 27 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Calliopejen1 (talk) 21:07, 19 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 27 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Calliopejen1 (talk) 21:08, 19 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 27 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Orphaned, Low quality, doesn't thumbnail properly Calliopejen1 (talk) 21:09, 19 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 27 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Orphaned, collage of six images, not clear that uploader took these photos Calliopejen1 (talk) 21:10, 19 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 27 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Orphaned, unclear encyclopedic value Calliopejen1 (talk) 21:10, 19 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 27 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Orphaned logo, either unencyclopedic or copyvio Calliopejen1 (talk) 21:12, 19 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 27 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Calliopejen1 (talk) 21:12, 19 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 27 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Calliopejen1 (talk) 21:12, 19 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 27 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Orphaned, unclear encyclopedic value Calliopejen1 (talk) 21:13, 19 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 27 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Calliopejen1 (talk) 21:13, 19 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Calliopejen1 (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:01, 22 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Orphaned, Low quality Calliopejen1 (talk) 21:14, 19 November 2011 (UTC) Speedy delete per creator's request, since a better quality image has replaced this one. Sebwite (talk) 23:16, 20 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 27 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Orphaned, unclear encyclopedic value, possible copyvio Calliopejen1 (talk) 21:15, 19 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 27 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Calliopejen1 (talk) 21:16, 19 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 27 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Calliopejen1 (talk) 21:17, 19 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:02, 27 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Calliopejen1 (talk) 21:18, 19 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 27 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Calliopejen1 (talk) 21:18, 19 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 27 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
OR and LQ, absentee uploader (not active in over 3 years), unclear what the image is representing so usefulness to the encyclopedia is impossible to judge. Angr (talk) 21:49, 19 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]