< October 25	October 27 >

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete most. SchuminWeb (Talk) 14:15, 6 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The listed files have no authorship or publication information regarding the depicted artworks. ((nsd)) speedy deletion tags have been removed, bringing here for further discussion. Kelly ^hi! 02:54, 26 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:J-Dryden.jpg is, obviously, part of a photo of a painting of John Dryden. We have a different version of the same painting as File:John Dryden portrait.jpg. Both are severe crops of the original painting. The quality of this image isn't so great but it's obviously in the public domain given how long Dryden has been dead. Mangoe (talk) 03:28, 26 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- They are crops of File:John Dryden by James Maubert.jpg, which is PD. Calliopejen1 (talk) 03:29, 26 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The Charles II one is a worse-quality duplicate of File:Charles II in garter robes.jpg. I'd delete it as superseded. Calliopejen1 (talk) 03:32, 26 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
If we can't find where Elizabeth Montagu comes from, there are verifiably PD images of her in this book and this book. Calliopejen1 (talk) 03:35, 26 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Found the source for the Davanent one. Calliopejen1 (talk) 03:54, 26 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Without sources, I'd delete Steele, Montagu, and Rupert - none are self-evidently PD. Calliopejen1 (talk) 03:57, 26 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:02, 4 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, encyclopedic value unclear - no meaningful description, doesn't seem to have ever been added to an article Calliopejen1 (talk) 03:12, 26 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, may have something to do with the military of Ukraine. Worth keeping? Calliopejen1 (talk) 03:13, 26 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:02, 4 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, encyclopedic value unclear - no meaningful description, doesn't seem to have ever been added to an article Calliopejen1 (talk) 03:12, 26 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, may have something to do with the military of Ukraine. Worth keeping? Calliopejen1 (talk) 03:13, 26 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:02, 4 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, doubt this is from a real version of the x factor considering the surroundings - seems to be related to St Edmund Campion Catholic School based on user's deleted contribs Calliopejen1 (talk) 03:16, 26 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:02, 4 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

see above Calliopejen1 (talk) 03:17, 26 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:02, 4 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, could be recreated with text / math functionality Calliopejen1 (talk) 03:18, 26 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:02, 4 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, could be recreated with text / math functionality Calliopejen1 (talk) 03:18, 26 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:02, 4 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, Unencyclopedic, possible copyvio Calliopejen1 (talk) 03:19, 26 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:02, 4 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, this is the uploader's only upload and one of two contributions ever, and it has no stated source. i'm 60/40 inclined to delete out of fear it was taken from the internet somewhere. thoughts? Calliopejen1 (talk) 03:26, 26 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:02, 4 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Calliopejen1 (talk) 03:58, 26 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:02, 4 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, photo of copyrighted packaging Calliopejen1 (talk) 03:59, 26 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:02, 4 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, I can't see this ever being useful Calliopejen1 (talk) 03:59, 26 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:02, 4 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Calliopejen1 (talk) 03:59, 26 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:02, 4 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Calliopejen1 (talk) 03:59, 26 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:02, 4 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, Low quality, encyclopedic value unclear Calliopejen1 (talk) 04:02, 26 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:02, 4 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, Unencyclopedic, possible copyvio Calliopejen1 (talk) 04:02, 26 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:02, 4 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, Unencyclopedic, possible copyvio Calliopejen1 (talk) 04:03, 26 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:02, 4 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, unclear encyclopedic value (promotional?) Calliopejen1 (talk) 04:04, 26 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:02, 4 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Calliopejen1 (talk) 04:04, 26 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:02, 4 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, Unencyclopedic (Shpend Xani Actor), possible copyvio (promo photo) Calliopejen1 (talk) 04:06, 26 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:02, 4 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, Unencyclopedic (Shpend Xani Actor), possible copyvio (promo photo) Calliopejen1 (talk) 04:07, 26 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:02, 4 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, no stated source, possible copyvio Calliopejen1 (talk) 04:07, 26 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:02, 4 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, Low quality compared to other generic xbox controller images Calliopejen1 (talk) 04:08, 26 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:02, 4 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Calliopejen1 (talk) 04:08, 26 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:02, 4 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, likely copyvio Calliopejen1 (talk) 04:09, 26 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:02, 4 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, Unencyclopedic, possible copyvio Calliopejen1 (talk) 04:10, 26 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:02, 4 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, unclear encyclopedic value Calliopejen1 (talk) 04:10, 26 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:02, 4 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, unclear encyclopedic value Calliopejen1 (talk) 04:10, 26 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:02, 4 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, Unencyclopedic, possible copyvio Calliopejen1 (talk) 04:10, 26 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:02, 4 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Calliopejen1 (talk) 04:12, 26 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:02, 4 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Calliopejen1 (talk) 04:12, 26 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:02, 4 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Calliopejen1 (talk) 04:12, 26 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:02, 4 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, Unencyclopedic, likely copyvio Calliopejen1 (talk) 04:13, 26 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:02, 4 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, Unencyclopedic, likely copyvio Calliopejen1 (talk) 04:13, 26 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:02, 4 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, not useful anymore Calliopejen1 (talk) 04:13, 26 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:02, 4 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Calliopejen1 (talk) 04:14, 26 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:02, 4 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, we seem to have several better examples already in XeTeX Calliopejen1 (talk) 04:36, 26 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:02, 4 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Calliopejen1 (talk) 04:36, 26 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:02, 4 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, Unencyclopedic (Cassavetes) Calliopejen1 (talk) 04:37, 26 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:02, 4 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, Unencyclopedic, possible copyvio Calliopejen1 (talk) 04:37, 26 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:02, 4 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Calliopejen1 (talk) 04:37, 26 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:02, 4 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, Unencyclopedic (Round Ear Spock) Calliopejen1 (talk) 04:37, 26 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:02, 4 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, i don't think this is really self-taken given the watermark Calliopejen1 (talk) 04:39, 26 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:02, 4 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, unclear encyclopedic value, not sure if this incorporates copyrighted elements Calliopejen1 (talk) 04:39, 26 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:02, 4 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Calliopejen1 (talk) 04:40, 26 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:02, 4 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, highly doubt this was self-taken Calliopejen1 (talk) 04:41, 26 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:02, 4 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, highly doubt this was self-taken Calliopejen1 (talk) 04:42, 26 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:02, 4 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, looks like a promotional image for a hotel, no metadata, user has uploaded at least a couple copyvios (see above) Calliopejen1 (talk) 04:42, 26 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:02, 4 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Calliopejen1 (talk) 04:43, 26 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:02, 4 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, Unencyclopedic (Xholon) Calliopejen1 (talk) 04:44, 26 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:02, 4 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Calliopejen1 (talk) 04:44, 26 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:02, 4 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Calliopejen1 (talk) 04:45, 26 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:02, 4 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, Low quality, we have better images[1] Calliopejen1 (talk) 04:45, 26 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 09:05, 6 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, photo of artworks that are presumably copyrighted without evidence to the contrary Calliopejen1 (talk) 04:46, 26 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Has anyone complained? If the Tourist Site wanted it removed, I would do so myself. But on the whole, Chinese are relaxed about 'Intellectual Property Rights'. And they might even get a sale off of the photo.

You could also argue that the rights belonged to the First Quin Emperor, who has been dead some time. And that it is now part of global culture. --GwydionM (talk) 16:32, 27 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Leaning delete. The keep rational so far is WP:NOBODYCOMPLAINED. --Tryptofish (talk) 16:44, 1 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:02, 4 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, Low quality Calliopejen1 (talk) 04:46, 26 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:02, 4 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Calliopejen1 (talk) 05:06, 26 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:02, 4 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, unclear encyclopedic value, possible copyvio Calliopejen1 (talk) 05:08, 26 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:02, 4 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, possible copyvio - watermarked, uploader has credited images to multiple people Calliopejen1 (talk) 05:09, 26 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I also just marked another image on commons originally uploaded by this user (and credited to the same photographer) as a copyvio because it came from abt.org. Calliopejen1 (talk) 05:15, 26 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:02, 4 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Calliopejen1 (talk) 05:16, 26 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 09:05, 6 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

No FUR. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 05:27, 26 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:02, 4 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, user has credited professional-looking ballet images to at least two photographers and has uploaded at least one confirmed copyvio Calliopejen1 (talk) 05:34, 26 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:02, 4 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, unclear encyclopedic value Calliopejen1 (talk) 05:34, 26 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:02, 4 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Calliopejen1 (talk) 05:52, 26 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Wrong forum. The file is on Commons. Please nominate it for deletion there if you still feel it should be deleted. AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:05, 26 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

this image is old and does not fit the article with the current members and is requested to be deleted, the image represents 5 members in the group, but for more than two years ago, three of the members have not been an active with the group, this image is old and needs to updated, wikipedia represents new and updated information, this picture is 4 years old. Homindbsk (talk) 06:32, 26 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 09:05, 6 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Invalid FUR —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 06:44, 26 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:02, 4 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

LQ+OB+OR: the top of Big Ben is missing. Tilted. Plenty of better files available. 77.184.161.20 (talk) 07:25, 26 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. No sense keeping it around. SchuminWeb (Talk) 03:40, 28 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete. The decision hinges on one proposition: whether an image of the train at Portland Union Station has enough encyclopedic purpose that is not satisfied by individual images of the station and of the train at an unidentifiable location to satisfy WP:NFCC#1. The "keep" side did not successfully support that proposition (bare assertions that it does with no supporting reasoning do not make it so, even if repeated frequently and at length), so NFCC demands we use the free images instead and thus this image should be deleted.

Also, I concur with Herostratus that edit warring to remove the image from the article and then claiming it is "orphaned", if this is in fact what occurred, is certainly not appropriate behavior. Anomie ⚔ 19:25, 16 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Relisting per Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2011 October 18. I abstain. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 07:26, 26 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Strong Keep There is no free image available of this specific subject (the "Flying Yankee" departing the Portland Union Station) for use in the article Railroad history of Portland, Maine to illustrate the paragraph therein about the importance of this specific MEC/B&M jointly operated train to Portland which for decades it both served as that station's premier run and where it was also physically based. (The generic free image File:Flying Yankee 1935.jpg from a Veedol Oil advertisement is not an appropriate or adequate substitute for this one as it shows only the train set but not Portland Union Station or anything else identifiable.) As no other image of this train at Portland is available, this one does not violate WP:NFCC#1. The claim that this image (which has been in use on WP for almost seven years without complaint) also violates WP:NFCC#7 because it was "no longer being used" is disingenuous because it is the original proposer (who is not the administrative relister who indicates that he is neutral) of this deletion review himself who keeps removing this relevant and encyclopedically valuable image on the vague claim that it is a "blatant violation of non-free content criteria" for which he has made no case that has yet been supported by the WP community. (A "placeholder" image from Commons of the Flying Yankee logo is currently occupying the MEC Flying Yankee image's spot in that article to prevent it being removed for a fourth time by the original FFD's proposer until this discussion is closed.)

As long as this image is available on WP (which the original discussion closed in favor of "Keep" still makes it), then arbitrarily removing it as being "vandalism" constitutes disruptive behavior and shows bad faith. No editor other than the original proposer of both its deletion and the subsequent review has yet spoken in favor of deleting this image from WP. Unless and until it is deleted by the community for cause, then it deserves to be respected and accepted as valid as does its use to appropriately illustrate the article on the railroad history of Portland in which it was placed. Centpacrr (talk) 12:29, 26 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. I agree that image is not orphaned, or should not be considered orphaned, and that a person deleting it from articles and then arguing that it is orphaned (if this is what occurred) is not proper. So any arguments that it is "orphaned" should be disregarded. (And it's understandable that this would be upsetting.)

Moving on to the substance of the matter, I don't buy the argument that a picture of the train at Portland Station is very different than just a picture of a train. It doesn't impart any crucial information that a person can't get by looking at the free image, looking at a picture of Portland Station, and putting the two together mentally. This comes to a matter of subjective opinion to some extent, I guess. (This image is a lot higher-quality than the free image, which is grainy. Is it enough better that we should use this image? Not in my opinion. The free image is good enough to give a general idea of what the train looked like.) Herostratus (talk) 15:40, 26 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The purpose of the image is to illustrate this particular train at Portland Union Station (the city's iconic railroad history landmark which was demolished in 1961) where for 23 years (1935-57) it was both based and made three daily departures (two to Boston, one to Bangor), not to just show the train itself without relating it to Portland, the subject of both the article and the section in which it is meant to appear. The subject image is the only one that does that (and had done so on WP for seven years), the generic image does not. Centpacrr (talk) 16:43, 26 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

"[...]for 23 years (1935-57) it was both based and made three daily departures (two to Boston, one to Bangor)[...]" You just proved our point about an adequate textual description. SchuminWeb (Talk) 13:33, 27 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

No, that absolutely does not prove your "point" as "adequate textual description" as a reason to exclude an illustration is a patently meaningless "standard" as I have explained to you before and have also stated again below as any and every image on WP could logically be eliminated for that reason. Illustrations are not "substitutes" for "textual descriptions" (or vice versa), but instead each is an adjunct and enhancement to the other. In fact WP policy is that images must have a contextual relationship to the article to be included in the first place so in fact it is the lack of an "adequate textual description" that is proper grounds for not using an image and not the other way around. Centpacrr (talk) 17:23, 27 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I understand your argument, Centpacrr. It's a reasonable argument. It's just not one I agree with, in this case.

To the extent that there was bad behavior -- removing the image from articles and then claiming orphan status, if this did occur (and without having looked into our procedures, this seems not fair) -- this is understandably frustrating. And not wanting to get into the middle of that, it's not a good thing to reward bad behavior. But here we are just discussing the technical merits of the matter at hand, I guess.

I'm personally not that enthusiastic about our policy on images anyway (which I expressed in the satirical "Guidelines for uploading photographs"); I wish we were more concerned about our own quality and less about the needs of downstream users. But one of our founding principles, for better or worse, is that users should be assured that they can re-use material they find here, to the extent its reasonably possible for us to do that. This image is not enough different from the free image, in my personal subjective opinion, for us to override this principle in this case. Herostratus (talk) 14:22, 27 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Flying Yankee at Portland Union Sataion.jpg must also be considered here - it's a derivative work of the first. If the photo has to go, this has to go too. If the photo doesn't have to go, there's no use keeping it. Calliopejen1 (talk) 19:42, 26 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Listing that file at PUF. SchuminWeb (Talk) 20:17, 26 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  This illustration is not a derivative work the reasons for which are fully explained in the PUF. Centpacrr (talk) 02:39, 28 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  We're not talking about that image here anymore... SchuminWeb (Talk) 03:38, 28 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. We have a free image of the train. We also have free images of the station. We can describe textually and with the free images of the train and the station that the two had been "in the same room together" at various times in the past without dipping into the non-free content (i.e. WP:NFCC#8). I see no reason to keep the non-free image around on account of this, as free content will more than adequately do the job. SchuminWeb (Talk) 20:17, 26 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

That is the same argument that this user (who is also the original deletion proposer) made in an earlier discussion stating there that the image is "not required" because it can be "described textually". (Over the past few weeks this user has has also been proposing for deletion every one of the dozens of Otto Perry images on WP whether or not there is any free substitute at all on the grounds that were "not needed".) This is a fallacious argument, however, as the very definition of "required" or "requirement" ("Something demanded or imposed as an obligation") makes that a patently meaningless "standard" for the use of any images and illustrations (either non-free or free) on WP (or in any encyclopedia for that matter). As it can legitimately be argued that anything and everything can be "adequately understood" by way of "textual description", by that "standard" there would not be a single image anywhere on Wikipedia because no images would ever be "required". The reason that millions of images and illustrations (both free and "non-free") are included on WP, however, is not because a single one of them is "required" but because each one has been added to assist and enhance the reader's understanding of the text. As no image or illustration is really a "substitute" for context but an adjunct to it, the real "standard" for inclusion of images and illustrations is instead "editorial judgment" as none can ever be said to be "required" or, for that matter, "not required". When a "non-free" image is materially better then an allegedly "free" one (see my earlier comment above for why this is true in this case), then good editorial judgment should always mitigate in favor of the better image even if non-free. Centpacrr (talk) 04:34, 27 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as failing NFCC#8, as there are free images available of the train, I cannot see how showing it's appearance in a given venue is significantly adding, nor how it would be detrimental to understanding. Readers can easily understand the concept that the train was at the station without needing a picture of it. If there were some specific modification made to the station and/or train in order to support the service and the photo clearly showed that, then my opinion might be different, in it's current form it's not a difficult concept to explain or imagine. Generic arguments which could apply to any picture someone takes a fancy should be included shouldn't be an end run around NFCC#8. --82.19.4.7 (talk) 08:05, 30 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Still Strong Keep The railroad history of the "given venue" this illustrates is, in fact, the subject of the article so it is clearly significant. For 23 years the "Flying Yankee" was the premier train to serve this venue with two sourthbound (to Boston) and one northbound (to Bangor) departures a day Monday through Saturday. (This train was also based in Portland when not in use.) It is therefore completely editorially appropriate to employ this image to illustrate the relationship between the "Flying Yankee" and Portland, Maine. Centpacrr (talk) 19:03, 1 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Still Delete not sure what the wanting more !votes is about. Stuffing the word "clearly" in front of other phrases isn't a magic shortcut, it doesn't mean no one but an idiot disagrees. However I'm not sure anyone is arguing about the subject being significant, and I don't think anyone is arguing that the significant subject should be removed from the article. However the subject being significant and requiring a picture to understand that significance are a world apart. As for something being editorially appropriate that's not the same thing as adding significantly to the readers understanding such that not having it would be detrimental.. If the foundation in requiring an NFCC policy envisaged the inclusion of material just merely to be because we believed and image would be good to have, they wouldn't have bothered with the requirement for NFCC at all. --82.19.4.7 (talk) 19:16, 4 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Again setting a standard that an image must be "required" in order to be used appropriately is meaningless as no image could ever meet such a standard of being a requirement (i.e. is "something demanded or imposed as an obligation") to illustrate anything. (See my earlier comment on this topic above.) Images are not requirements on WP but are instead adjuncts and/or enhancements employed to visually illustrate aspects described in the text, and that is exactly what this image does. Centpacrr (talk) 19:32, 4 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I've followed, our non-negotiable standard as laid out by the wikimedia foundation - "Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding.". To repeat my earlier view, understanding that a train appeared at a particular station is not significantly increased by showing a picture, it's not a difficult concept to either understand or explain. That you wish to then try and twist on a single word I used in expressing my view that the standard was failed to be met, is just sophistry and frankly neither here nor there. --82.19.4.7 (talk) 21:11, 4 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The issue here is an editorial judgment as to this "standard" for the use of the image. In my view it meets that test, in your view it does not. I believe that this image appropriately illustrates, significantly enhances, and increases the understanding and appreciation of the subject in the section in which it was used which is the importance and connection of the "Flying Yankee" to the railroad history of Portland, Maine. Centpacrr (talk) 21:22, 4 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Wrong forum. The file is on Commons. Please nominate it for deletion there if you still feel it should be deleted. AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:05, 26 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphan. Unencyclopedic Briefshareness (talk) 07:42, 26 October 2011 (UTC) ((subst:delete2|image=File:Brandon Byrd 2010.JPG|reason=Orphan. Unencyclopedic - Briefshareness (talk) 07:42, 26 October 2011 (UTC)))[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:02, 4 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, we have many better images of this structure already at commons[2] Calliopejen1 (talk) 17:59, 26 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:02, 4 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

OR; LQ Magog the Ogre (talk) 18:40, 26 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Weak delete not the worst image, but I'm a little skeptical that the uploader is the copyright holder given their other uploads (which span decades, esp if you consider the deleted uploads) Calliopejen1 (talk) 19:43, 26 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:02, 4 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, unclear encyclopedic value Calliopejen1 (talk) 19:28, 26 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:02, 4 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, unclear encyclopedic value Calliopejen1 (talk) 19:28, 26 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:02, 4 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, unclear encyclopedic value Calliopejen1 (talk) 19:28, 26 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 16:11, 6 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, doesn't appear to be useful Calliopejen1 (talk) 19:33, 26 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A direct derivative of this image is used on WP (same name with a .png) and at present this file is the only place where a correct history of that other image can be found is stored. Therefore if you delete this image you are obliged first to update the other image which only cites this one with correct history. See [[3]]--BozMo talk 17:48, 31 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:02, 4 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Calliopejen1 (talk) 19:33, 26 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:02, 4 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, Unencyclopedic (William A. Lilly) Calliopejen1 (talk) 19:35, 26 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:02, 4 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, Unencyclopedic (William A. Lilly) Calliopejen1 (talk) 19:35, 26 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:02, 4 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, no source for data in graph Calliopejen1 (talk) 19:37, 26 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as G7 by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:02, 28 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, undescribed, Low quality, not entirely clear whether this is uploader's own photograph Calliopejen1 (talk) 19:38, 26 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

"Throw the package out" (Prof. Henry Higgins) Although I am listed as the uploader of this image, it was actually one that I tried to improve many years ago when I did not know how to do that. Probably still don't. Tried and failed. Dump it — Preceding unsigned comment added by Carptrash (talk • contribs)

I'm going to treat this as a G7, then. Deleted... SchuminWeb (Talk) 02:28, 28 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:02, 4 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, superseded by svg Calliopejen1 (talk) 19:38, 26 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:02, 4 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, doesn't seem useful Calliopejen1 (talk) 19:39, 26 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:02, 4 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, doesn't seem useful Calliopejen1 (talk) 19:39, 26 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:02, 4 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, Unencyclopedic, possible copyvio Calliopejen1 (talk) 19:39, 26 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:02, 4 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, superseded by File:World Association of Girl Guides and Girl Scouts map.svg Calliopejen1 (talk) 19:44, 26 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:02, 4 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, superseded by File:World Association of Girl Guides and Girl Scouts map.svg Calliopejen1 (talk) 19:44, 26 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:02, 4 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, superseded by File:World Association of Girl Guides and Girl Scouts map.svg Calliopejen1 (talk) 19:45, 26 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:02, 4 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, superseded by File:World Association of Girl Guides and Girl Scouts map.svg Calliopejen1 (talk) 19:45, 26 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:02, 4 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Calliopejen1 (talk) 19:46, 26 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete as replaceable fair use. Those arguing to keep this image might have had a better case if the image was actually being used that way, but it's not. In any case, though, that kind of usage could be described textually with a citation to a source. SchuminWeb (Talk) 14:22, 6 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Copyrighted product packaging for salad dressing used in the articles Salad, Caesar salad, and List of salads. Replaceable with a free image (such as a photo of the dressing minus the packaging) per WP:NFCC#1. Kelly ^hi! 21:15, 26 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I already explained the rationale behind using this at the just closed WP:PUF discussion on this image posted by the same user who is now nominating it for deletion, so I'm just going to copy over the relevant portion of my remarks from that debate: "If you want to discuss whether it should be used in the article at all I believe the article talk page would be the appropriate place. I'm also unclear on what is deficient in the FUR. We have a picture of a salad, but had none of the dressing without which it wouldn't be a Caesar. As this one is based on the original recipe developed by the dish's creator it seemed like a natural choice." I agree that there is no FUR and no compelling reason for this to be used in those other two articles, which I had nothing to do with, but it is certainly germane to the article about the the dish itself, which details the somewhat controversial history of the dish, including debate about whether Cardini's recipe really is the original as claimed by this package. I would also note that this the second attempt to simply be rid of this file, with no attempt made by this user to actually discuss its use in any particular article. In fact in the last discussion they ignored my query as to whether I had done enough to satisfy their concerns, instead waiting a further 11 days until that discussion was closed[4] before opening this one just a few hours later. Beeblebrox (talk) 21:45, 26 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Actually the point of the PUF discussion was to determine whether or not the image was copyrighted (it previously had a free license), the consensus seemed to be that the image was, in fact, non-free. This discussion is about whether it complies with WP:NFCC. Kelly ^hi! 22:24, 26 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Could easily show Caesar dressing in a non-branded bottle. No need for copyrighted packaging. (In fact, here the packaging greatly obscures the dressing, making for a relatively unhelpful image.) Calliopejen1 (talk) 23:27, 26 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Without the package all you would see is a pile of light brown glop with specks of black pepper in it. I don't know why I am having such trouble communicating this concept, but I will try again: The photograph was deliberately taken with this particular brand as the subject, to demonstrate that Caesar Cardini, and now his descendants, claim the "original recipe" for this dressing. Beeblebrox (talk) 19:14, 27 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

That is not how the image is being used in any of the linked articles, and that claim could easily be conveyed without a picture in any event. ("Caesar Cardini claimed to have created the original recipe for this dressing."[ref]) Currently it is being used as a generic image of caesar salad dressing. Calliopejen1 (talk) 22:42, 27 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

As I mentioned earlier, I had nothing to do with adding it to any article other than Caesar Salad, where it is in fact used in the manner I described. It had a slightly different caption originally, but for some reason a user felt it was too promotional and changed it to the very bland caption used now. There is no WP:FUR for the other uses, so either somebody should add one or it should be taken off of those other articles. Beeblebrox (talk) 20:25, 5 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Keep These arguments that one can take pictures of condiments without their packaging are quite bizarre. The packaging is important here to identify this version of the dressing as being that marketed as Cardini's own. Mangoe (talk) 17:02, 31 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. I've looked at each of the three pages where it's used, and it seems to me to go against the informational value of the text to replace the image with one that is unlabeled. The label actually relates to subject history discussed in the text. --Tryptofish (talk) 16:50, 1 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:02, 4 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

2007 file with no copyright information. An IP believes that This image is unauthorized. In any case, it is orphaned and I can't find any related article. -- Luk ^talk 21:47, 26 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:02, 4 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, Low quality (File:Waikiki Aquarium2.JPG is better photo of same fish) Calliopejen1 (talk) 23:16, 26 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete half a fish and somebody's baby. Clearly a vacation photo and not of any use here. Beeblebrox (talk) 19:19, 27 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Not encyclopedic. --Tryptofish (talk) 15:55, 28 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:02, 4 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Calliopejen1 (talk) 23:16, 26 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Can't even tell what the man and the baby are looking at, can't imagine any encyclopedic use for this. Beeblebrox (talk) 19:17, 27 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Not encyclopedic. --Tryptofish (talk) 15:58, 28 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:02, 4 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Calliopejen1 (talk) 23:16, 26 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete For the same reasons as the other, clearly not intended to be used to improve an encyclopedia. Beeblebrox (talk) 19:20, 27 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Not encyclopedic. --Tryptofish (talk) 15:58, 28 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:02, 4 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, Low quality Calliopejen1 (talk) 23:23, 26 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete At least there's not a baby head in this one, but as the nom says it is orphaned of a very low quality. Beeblebrox (talk) 19:21, 27 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Too low in quality. --Tryptofish (talk) 15:59, 28 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:02, 4 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Calliopejen1 (talk) 23:23, 26 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Beeblebrox (talk) 19:22, 27 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

October 26

Various unsourced images of 2D artworks

File:X 0caa6c24.jpg

File:X 3d1daed8.jpg

File:X factor winner 2008 (4).jpg

File:X factor winner 2008 (2).jpg

File:X parenthesis n odd.svg

File:X tilde parentheses n odd.svg

File:X-chrome.jpg

File:Xbox360Controller.jpg

File:Xc360 approved.gif

File:Xbox360gopro.jpg

File:XCode-version-timeline.png

File:Xbw5.jpg

File:JJJJ.jpg

File:X360bandwidthdiagram.png

File:X577.jpg

File:Sx765.jpg

File:Xadsa.jpg

File:XamProductions LOGO.png

File:Xani shpend.jpg

File:Shpend Xani.jpg

File:X-terminator.gif

File:Xboxblackpaddle.jpg

File:Xaviersusai 2.jpg

File:Mument 2.JPG

File:Young enterprise.gif

File:Group photo edited without van.JPG

File:Xarabank1.jpg

File:Tree planting pic for article.jpg

File:XCstart.PNG

File:XEFE.JPG

File:Xena1.jpg

File:Xenocide.jpg

File:Xenon.png

File:Xenus-design.jpg

File:XeonStudios.jpg

File:Xetex sample.svg

File:Xevil.jpg

File:Cassavetes-Feb2006.jpg

File:Dawgsandbitchesintheback.gif

File:Dawgmouth.jpg

File:Roundearspock1997.jpg

File:Xfactor4launch.jpg

File:Xfce-Custom.png

File:XGENEI PHOTO.jpg

File:Jaydimichelmodeljal.JPG

File:Rbd-4-fdo-aceves.jpg

File:Xelhabeacch.jpg

File:XHLAR.JPG

File:XholonCellModel.png

File:Xi0hw.jpg

File:Dbbdoor0.jpg

File:Xiamen Airlines737.JPG

File:Xian Terracotta soldier replicas.jpg

File:XianC.JPG

File:Xihixname.png

File:Xinscreenshot.jpg

File:Xiomara reyes ballet.jpg

File:Xixgon1.jpg

File:Prof bros.png

File:Corella as Romeo.jpg

File:Papal shop.jpg

File:Xionlol.jpg

File:TVXQ in Paris France.JPG

File:AthfMovieLogo1.PNG

File:Big Ben and Parliament.JPG

File:MEC Flying Yankee.jpg

File:Brandon Byrd 2010.JPG

File:Marblearch.JPG

File:Junk in China Camp.jpg

File:W renamed registers.JPG

File:W renamed registers1.JPG

File:Wo renamed registers.JPG

File:W4sdatabase-example.jpg

File:W8m04i.jpg

File:Wabill.jpg

File:Penholders.jpg

File:WACostMedicaidBirthsGraph.gif

File:Waddesdon-try.jpg