The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 05:02, 14 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Violates WP:NFCC#8. I have no idea why this is being used to be honest, this isn't even an album cover, but a teaser image. — ξxplicit 02:11, 7 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Image does not exist. If the file name in the header contains a typo, feel free to correct the typo and un-close this discussion. AnomieBOT⚡ 06:07, 7 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Unencyclopedic Douglas dt (talk) 05:34, 7 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 15 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Image initially removed from The General (locomotive) as failing WP:NFCC#8, where (A) free images exist of the same subject, and (B) there was nothing special enough about the 1939 exhibition of the locomotive to require use of a non-free image to show it. The removal was challenged, and so it's now up for discussion. SchuminWeb (Talk) 11:12, 7 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F9 by Dragons flight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:16, 8 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I doubt that the uploader owns the rights on this file. Hektor (talk) 12:22, 7 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 15 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Photo of the marquis of a non-notable restaurant. Orphan, not useful. – Quadell (talk) 13:52, 7 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 15 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Random building, bad title, orphan, not useful – Quadell (talk) 13:54, 7 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 15 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Photo of statue (bad title). Copyright status of statue unknown. Used only on a talk page. – Quadell (talk) 13:56, 7 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 15 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Derivative work of the sculpture depicted. See Commons:Freedom_of_panorama#Bulgaria for more. – Quadell (talk) 14:00, 7 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 15 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Bad title, man standing next to graffitti, not useful. – Quadell (talk) 14:02, 7 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 15 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Orphan image, bad title, no description, some building, not useful – Quadell (talk) 14:06, 7 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 15 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
A color-corrected version with a better name is at File:Re Tenkei 1.JPG. – Quadell (talk) 14:10, 7 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Keep. -FASTILY (TALK) 00:40, 15 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
replaceable non-free image. organization still exists, a similar photo could be created. Calliopejen1 (talk) 20:58, 7 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Wrong forum. The file is on Commons. Please nominate it for deletion there if you still feel it should be deleted. AnomieBOT⚡ 22:15, 7 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Copywrite violation - The version from exoticindiaart.com is a modern interpretation, copyright Navrang. It is not a faithful version of the original, although it uses the same composition. It should be deleted and replaced with the previous, 16th century, version. 210.1.205.96 (talk) 22:07, 7 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]