< January 11	January 13 >

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Mark Arsten (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:01, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free work. OSborn ^arf_contribs. 04:26, 12 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 22:11, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Unused locally, not useful for Commons because it has has a freehand red X over File:Edit-clear.svg and converted to PNG. It could be replaced with a line drawn using the "line" tool of any vector graphics editor and retain its original SVG format. Cube00 (talk) 07:11, 12 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 22:11, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Unused locally and already deleted from Commons due to unclear licencing. Cube00 (talk) 07:23, 12 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 22:11, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Unencyclopedic - self-portrait used only by persistent self-promoter User:Ruturaj Prajapati and numerous socks User:Ruturaj Prajapati (Member), User:Ruturaj Prajapati(Politician) etc. JohnCD (talk) 11:30, 12 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 22:11, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Fails WP:NFCC#8. Stefan2 (talk) 16:32, 12 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by PhilKnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 12:07, 25 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This image does not suite the image of Azonto on Wikipedia. →Enock4seth ^(talk) 17:26, 12 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 22:11, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Fails WP:NFCC#8. Stefan2 (talk) 17:27, 12 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 22:11, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Fails WP:NFCC#8, a free image of Katy Perry is enough. —Indian:BIO · ^{[ ChitChat ]} 17:27, 12 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 22:11, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Fails WP:NFCC#8. Stefan2 (talk) 17:48, 12 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 22:11, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The artist is still alive and the article contains other paintings made by him. The image therefore fails WP:NFCC. Stefan2 (talk) 17:49, 12 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 22:11, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Fails WP:NFCC#8: not critically discussed. Stefan2 (talk) 17:55, 12 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 22:11, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Fails WP:NFCC#8. Stefan2 (talk) 18:07, 12 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 22:11, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Fails WP:NFCC#8. Stefan2 (talk) 18:10, 12 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Neutral I uploaded the file in good faith. I will let consensus decide it's fate.--Paul McDonald (talk) 21:50, 12 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 22:11, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

See Commons:Commons:Deletion requests/File:BERESNIAK-PP-AHV-3528-CM v4-LOGOPUB.jpg. Fails WP:NFCC#1 if non-free. Stefan2 (talk) 18:39, 12 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 22:11, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Fails WP:NFCC#8: not critically discussed. Stefan2 (talk) 18:40, 12 January 2014 (UTC) I thought I was granting use of the photo, hence it is not non-free. If I was mistaken in that, I would still be interested in uploading a smaller version of the file. jnschweitzer — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jnschweitzer (talk • contribs) 01:01, 13 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 22:11, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Fails WP:NFCC#8. Stefan2 (talk) 18:43, 12 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 22:11, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Fails WP:NFCC#8. Stefan2 (talk) 18:43, 12 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 22:11, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Fails WP:NFCC#3a: one cover is enough. Stefan2 (talk) 18:44, 12 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 22:11, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Fails WP:NFCC#8: none of the images is critically discussed. Fails WP:NFG: non-free gallery. Stefan2 (talk) 18:47, 12 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The image in question is a photo from the music video of the song. It is of fair use as it is used solely to demonstrate the video's concept of alternate personae as illustrated and no alternate image is available. The image has been resized to comply with Wikipedia standards. User5482 (talk) 16:23, 14 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

As explained above, the image doesn't comply with Wikipedia standards as it violates WP:NFCC#8. This is about WP:NFCC#8, not WP:NFCC#1 or WP:NFCC#3b. --Stefan2 (talk) 01:04, 15 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The image complies with Wikipedia standards and follows the guidelines of WP:NFCC#8 as its presence is used to describe the song's music video as illustrated in the article. The song's music video is an essential part of a music single's description and therefore, a screen cap of said video is used to demonstrate the art and promotional tools used to promote the song. This ultimately helps give the reader a complete understanding of the single and its promotion released by the artist. User5482 (talk) 14:24, 24 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 22:11, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Fails WP:NFCC#8: images are not critically discussed. Fails WP:NFG: non-free gallery. Stefan2 (talk) 18:49, 12 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The image in question is a photo from an alternate live music video of the song. It is of fair use as it is used solely to demonstrate the video's description as illustrated and no alternate image is available. The image has been resized to comply with Wikipedia standards. User5482 (talk) 16:25, 14 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

As explained above, the image doesn't comply with Wikipedia standards as it violates WP:NFCC#8. This is about WP:NFCC#8, not WP:NFCC#1 or WP:NFCC#3b. --Stefan2 (talk) 01:04, 15 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The image complies with Wikipedia standards and follows the guidelines of WP:NFCC#8 as its presence is used to describe the song's alternate music video as illustrated in the article. A song's music video is an essential part of a music single's description and therefore, a screen cap of said video is used to demonstrate the art and promotional tools used to promote the song. This ultimately helps give the reader a complete understanding of the single and its promotion released by the artist. User5482 (talk) 14:48, 24 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:00, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Fails WP:NFC#UUI §14. Also fails WP:NFCC#10c in 3 articles. Stefan2 (talk) 19:05, 12 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete. Overall I consider the arguments made by Stefan2 to be more persuasive. PhilKnight (talk) 12:33, 25 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Fails WP:NFCC#8: the historical marker isn't discussed critically. Stefan2 (talk) 19:10, 12 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I believe I fixed this. Please assist me if I did not do so correctly. Thank you.Djsteve321 (talk) 02:00, 15 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

There is still no critical discussion about the historical marker. Also, Wikipedia would never accept an image like this without permission from the photographer. --Stefan2 (talk) 16:23, 16 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The information in this file is directly connected with the topic and includes historical and factual information for the reader. The historic marker is located for public viewing on location and is important to this article. Please do not delete this file. Djsteve321 (talk) 03:47, 19 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Can we close this discussion and keep the file. Thank you. Djsteve321 (talk) 19:04, 12 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Djsteve321 (talk) 17:24, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:00, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Presumably fails WP:NFCC#1: probably possible to get a similar image from NASA. Stefan2 (talk) 19:12, 12 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please see the deletion discussion on SOHO images in commons. One outcome of that discussion was that even though NASA claims free license, that claim is probably invalid because these images are joint NASA/SOHO. SOHO licenses their images as free for non-commercial and educational use only. Because of that restriction, Commons consensus was to delete all the images in their Category:SOHO_images. However, it was also indicated in the Commons discussion that "These files may be re-uploaded in any Wikipedia as fair-use."

Out of respect for Commons consensus, I uploaded this one particular image as fair use rather than free, and did not search NASA for a similar image released under a questionable free license. Stigmatella aurantiaca (talk) 20:44, 12 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

On Commons, the consensus was that there was no evidence that the images were made by NASA employees. One user also wrote that it may be possible to upload some images under fair use claims to Wikipedia, giving one example on Russian Wikipedia. No idea whether he referred to our local WP:NFCC or only to the local Russian non-free policy. This doesn't mean that every image in that deletion discussion is suitable for fair use or that they can be returned to every page under a fair use claim. --Stefan2 (talk) 21:15, 12 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Given that NASA would claim the image is free, while SOHO releases as free only for non-commercial and educational use, what would the proper licensing be? Stigmatella aurantiaca (talk) 21:21, 12 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I placed a message on Stas1995's talk page on Commons, asking him for his input on this question. He also has a presence on the English Wikipedia, but he seems much more active on Commons. I hope this doesn't count as WP:Meatpuppetry??? Mostly he seems to be much more familiar with licensing issues than I am. Stigmatella aurantiaca (talk) 21:45, 12 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If this image illustrates something very specific unavailable elsewhere, then fair use is acceptable. However, do none of the images at Commons:Category:Solar Dynamics Observatory images or Commons:Category:STEREO images (such as File:STEREO green 195col ed.jpg, also at 195 Angstroms) satisfy your needs? — Huntster (t @ c) 02:32, 13 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

These images, like the images discussed in the Commons deletion discussion that I referred to above, are products of a NASA/SOHO joint collaboration. "The SOHO (ESA & NASA) joint project implies that all materials created by its probe are copyrighted and require permission for commercial non-educational use." If brought to the attention of any of the participants of that discussion, they will undoubtedly be deleted from Commons. I'm torn. Something in me says that I need to report these images, but I really don't want to. Stigmatella aurantiaca (talk) 06:18, 13 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Stigmatella aurantiaca, I'm not sure what you mean...the first category are SDO images, the second are STEREO images. Both are NASA, not NASA/ESA and certainly not from the SOHO spacecraft. If you find SOHO images on Commons at any point, let me know so I can have them deleted. Copyrighted and unfree images must always be removed from Commons, regardless of their perceived utility. — Huntster (t @ c) 13:10, 13 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry. I saw the generic warnings in the box underneath each of the images, and I assumed that they applied to the particular image, rather than being just a general warning. I need to look up the technologies involved. The article discussion in which I use the SOHO image concerns use of Fabry-Pérot thin-film etalons. Give me a day to do my research. Stigmatella aurantiaca (talk) 13:20, 13 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Just to keep up to date. I found a replacement image that I could use, but I've been too busy to do the necessary updates to the article, since the image is referenced to and discussed in the article body. I should be able to get to it this weekend. I'll let you know when I'm finished. Stigmatella aurantiaca (talk) 13:01, 17 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: kept and tagged for reduction. The animation is very poor and really should be removed simply on the basis that it's pointless - Peripitus (Talk) 22:57, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The animation effect fails WP:NFCC#8. The image as a whole also fails WP:NFCC#3b. Stefan2 (talk) 19:15, 12 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - It is the cover artwork for Because the Internet by Donald Glover. It was originally posted here and then reported here. See the physical packaging reveal, the physical copy functions with Lenticular printing where it changes as you angle it. So it adds to the article and does not fail the NFCC. STATic message me! 20:10, 12 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- Even if the image was published using unusual printing techniques, this is not a reason to include animation on Wikipedia. --Stefan2 (talk) 21:11, 12 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If we were not allowed to use animation, .gif among others would not be options when images are uploaded. STATic message me! 21:24, 12 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

That is a misunderstanding of WP:NFCC. The fact that animations are permitted in some cases doesn't mean that they aren't permitted everywhere. --Stefan2 (talk) 22:08, 12 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

And you have yet to give a policy backed reason why it should not be permitted, when that is the revealed cover art and that is how the physical cover appears. You seem to be causing quite a disruption with all these nominations today, when some like this one do not make a lick of sense.STATic message me! 23:23, 12 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Can someone please clarify why the cover is animated? ✄ (talk) 10:23, 14 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@✄: See the physical packaging reveal, the physical copy functions with lenticular printing where it changes as you angle it. The version used in the article is also the version the cover was original revealed as and nearly every time it has been posted on news sites, they use the animated cover. STATic message me! 16:15, 14 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. I think this is a weak keep on the grounds that we normally allow one album cover image and the animation is of such a poor quality that it does not offend NFCC#3b. ✄ (talk) 12:11, 17 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:00, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Fails WP:NFCC#8: none of the images is critically discussed. Fails WP:NFG: non-free gallery. Stefan2 (talk) 19:17, 12 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The image in question cites the influence shown from several of Jackson's music videos in clips released from Spears as referenced from other sources. The image is of fair use as it as solely an image of a music video which is used to demonstrate the influence of Jackson's videos on the aforementioned artist as illustrated and no alternate images are available. The image has now been resized to comply with Wikipedia standards. User5482 (talk) 16:18, 14 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

There is no critical discussion about what those music videos look like. See WP:NFCC#8. Also, do not mix up WP:NFCC#8 with WP:NFCC#1 or WP:NFCC#3b. --Stefan2 (talk) 01:06, 15 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The critical discussion is provided by sources such as Billboard, Buzzfeed, and Rolling Stone, some of which are direct quotes from Spears. The image meets the guidelines of WP:NFCC#8's "Contextual significance" as it increases the reader's understanding of the influence and overall impact of the videos on the release. User5482 (talk) 14:41, 24 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:00, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Fails WP:NFCC#8: none of the images is critically discussed. Fails WP:NFG: non-free gallery. Stefan2 (talk) 19:18, 12 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The image in question cites the influence shown from the "Every Time" music video in three separate videos as referenced from other sources. The image is of fair use as it is solely an image of a music video which is used to demonstrate the influence of Jackson's video on the aforementioned artists as illustrated and no alternate images are available. The image has now been resized to comply with Wikipedia standards. User5482 (talk) 16:27, 14 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

There is no critical discussion about what those music videos look like. See WP:NFCC#8. Also, do not mix up WP:NFCC#8 with WP:NFCC#1 or WP:NFCC#3b. --Stefan2 (talk) 01:06, 15 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The critical discussion is provided by sourced information. The image meets the guidelines of WP:NFCC#8's "Contextual significance" as it increases the reader's understanding of the influence and overall impact of the video by using a visual illustration. User5482 (talk) 14:45, 24 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:00, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Fails WP:NFCC#8: none of the images is critically discussed. Fails WP:NFG: non-free gallery. Stefan2 (talk) 19:18, 12 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The image in question cites the influence shown from the "I Get Lonely" music video in three separate videos as referenced from other sources. The image is of fair use as it is solely an image of a music video which is used to demonstrate the influence of Jackson's video on the aforementioned artists as illustrated and no alternate images are available. The image has now been resized to comply with Wikipedia standards. User5482 (talk) 16:13, 14 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

There is no critical discussion about what those music videos look like. See WP:NFCC#8. Also, do not mix up WP:NFCC#8 with WP:NFCC#1 or WP:NFCC#3b. --Stefan2 (talk) 01:06, 15 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The critical discussion is provided by sourced information, with one being a quote from the artist displayed. The image meets the guidelines of WP:NFCC#8's "Contextual significance" as it increases the reader's understanding of the influence and overall impact of the videos on the release. User5482 (talk) 14:43, 24 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:00, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Fails WP:NFCC#8: not critically discussed. Stefan2 (talk) 19:20, 12 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

As it says on the image's page, "This is a detail of a plate, less than a quarter of the total. It omits they key which explains the solid colours, coloured borders, and coloured strips. It is provided at reduced resolution, and is only 840x591 pixels." If this is not sufficient to achieve the criteria for fair use, how much further must it be shrunk? Maproom (talk) 19:32, 12 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You need to add sourced critical discussion about the map. See WP:NFCC#8. --Stefan2 (talk) 21:09, 12 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know what "sourced critical discussion" is, nor where to add it. Anyway, a bot has now reduced the resolution of the image. I hope the result is acceptable. Maproom (talk) 10:01, 13 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I'll try explaining here. This image is used in the article about the work of a cartographer, to illustrate his style. He uses colour, texture, and coloured borders to convey information on several different but related things in one map, in a way that is clear and not confusing. It is far easier to illustrate this with a small excerpt from his work, than to describe it in words. I claim that this constitutes "fair use". The excerpt is only a fraction of a plate, and does not include they key that explains the colours etc., making it useless for most purposes. Maproom (talk) 08:24, 19 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:00, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Fails WP:NFCC#8: not critically discussed. Stefan2 (talk) 19:26, 12 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:00, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Fails WP:NFCC#8: not critically discussed. Also excessively long, see WP:NFCC#3b. Stefan2 (talk) 22:06, 12 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:00, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Fails WP:NFCC#3b and WP:NFCC#8: not needed for understanding the article. The article already has another sound recording. Stefan2 (talk) 22:09, 12 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The audio in question is an alternate version of "Just a Little While" reproduced with a new arrangement and instrumental, which is described in the article. Although an audio clip of the original song is on the page, the second clip is of fair use as it as a new version of the song and not solely another clip of the same audio. User5482 (talk) 16:10, 14 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

There is no critical discussion about what the different song sounds like and this is not an article about the different song. See WP:NFCC#8. --Stefan2 (talk) 01:07, 15 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

A critical discussion is not necessary in this case as the audio is an alternate version of the same song which was reproduced to contrast with the original. The audio is used to demonstrate the alternate version scheduled for release on selected radio formats in addition to the original version, which meets the guidelines of WP:NFCC#8 to increase reader's understanding of the song's release. This can be deemed similar to how cover versions or remixes of a song are listed in music articles to provide further information. It is used in a brief section explaining this, and an entire new page for an alternate version of the same song would be unnecessary. User5482 (talk) 14:32, 24 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Mark Arsten (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:03, 19 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Fails WP:NFCC#8: random photographs of the main subject of the article. Not critically discussed. Fails WP:NFG: non-free gallery. Stefan2 (talk) 22:11, 12 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:00, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Redundant to File:Janet Jackson - Got Til Its Gone single cover.jpg. See WP:NFCC#3a. Stefan2 (talk) 22:13, 12 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The image in question is an alternate cover for the song and is used to demonstrate the various artwork the song received internationally. It is of fair use as it portrays this and no alternate image is available. User5482 (talk) 16:30, 14 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This is about WP:NFCC#3a, not WP:NFCC#1. --Stefan2 (talk) 01:08, 15 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding WP:NFCC#3a, the alternate cover may have some resemblance to the original, however, due to it contrasting with the original cover art, it seems to have a necessary place on the page to illustrate the various forms of artwork released as promotion for the song. User5482 (talk) 14:36, 24 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:00, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

There is no critical discussion about what the place looked like in 1975, so the image violates WP:NFCC#8. It possibly also violates WP:NFCC#1, depending on what the place looks like today. Stefan2 (talk) 22:58, 12 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F8 by Magog the Ogre (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:13, 24 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Fails WP:NFCC#8. Stefan2 (talk) 23:05, 12 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Mark Arsten (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:01, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Fails WP:NFCC#8. Stefan2 (talk) 23:05, 12 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:00, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Invalid FUR: despite the claim in the FUR, the article as a whole isn't specifically dedicated to a discussion of this collage of four screenshots. Also seems to violate WP:NFCC#8 and WP:NFG. Stefan2 (talk) 23:08, 12 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

It is. The photo was made to distinguish the original Tetes a Claques footage with the TAC.TV footage. Notice the pictures on top is called Super Bol and is in French while the bottom one is called Beat the Buzzer and its in English. --PeanutButterMarshmallowTime (talk) 00:21, 13 January 2014 (UTC)PeanutButterMarshmallowTime[reply]

Do you with "It is" mean that the article as a whole is specifically dedicated to a discussion of the collage? Then why is the article title Têtes à claques instead of Collage of four screenshots from Têtes à claques? --Stefan2 (talk) 01:09, 15 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:00, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Fails WP:NFCC#8 and WP:NFG: extra non-free logo without critical discussion. Stefan2 (talk) 23:32, 12 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Fry1989 ^eh? 17:17, 13 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, non-free image in gallery ✄ (talk) 10:24, 14 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:00, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

No evidence that all buildings by this architect have been demolished, so presumably fails WP:NFCC#1. No evidence that WP:NFCC#4 is satisfied. Stefan2 (talk) 23:36, 12 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

January 12

File:Feith Systems' BridgeLogiQ software product logo.png

File:40px-Edit-noclear.png

File:JStreicher RYZAMARANANPICS.JPG

File:Ruturaj Prajapati.jpg

File:White City The Music Movie.jpg

File:Azont Move 1.JPG

File:Early production line at Archway Cookies.jpeg

File:Teenage dream screenshot.jpg

File:Birthplace of Archway Cookies.jpeg

File:Danny Pierce in his studio.jpg

File:Early Archway Cookies product display.jpeg

File:Public Announcement on Lantau Trail.jpg

File:Artists depiction of the National Forensic League logo.jpg

File:Ariel Beresniak.jpg

File:Cast photo of "Sergeant Bates" play.jpg

File:Casey Patterson and Eddie Murphy.jpg

File:Casey Patterson with Keith Richards and Robert De Niro.jpg

File:Some Editions of the Bannawag Magazine.jpg

File:Janet - Just a Little While video.png

File:Janet - Just A Little While live music video.png

File:Logo WSA Tour.jpg

File:Contoocook Railroad Bridge and Depot Historic Marker.jpg

File:Solar storm 2003-10-26 (SOHO-EIT Ultraviolet 195 Å).png

File:Childish-gambino-because-the-internet.gif

File:Janet Jackson influence - Britney Spears.png

File:Janet - Everytime influence.png

File:Janet - I Get Lonely influence.png

File:Bereznay atlas plate 34 detail.png

File:Rollingstone99.jpg

File:Janet - Speed it Up (Put it On Me).ogg

File:Love Me (Just Blaze Remix).ogg

File:Janet - I Want You video.png

File:Janet Jackson - Got Til Its Gone vinyl cover.jpg

File:Nela Park 1975.png

File:Tom Flows Bo.jpg

File:Escape from LA poster.jpg

File:Tacvstetes.png

File:LCN LOGO 2.png

File:City of Phoenix Municipal Complex.jpg