< May 15 May 17 >

May 16

File:EmiratesArabicPalace.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 02:01, 24 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:EmiratesArabicPalace.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Asdfghkl12 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

The source states it is copyrighted, and doesn't say it is under Creative Commons. Emir of Wikipedia (talk) 07:58, 16 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:ClavertonWheel.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 02:01, 24 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:ClavertonWheel.JPG (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Bill Royds (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Missing evidence of permission, also seems to be non-commercial use only. Kelly hi! 10:36, 16 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Naanna Nenu Naa Boyfriends.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: convert to fair use. xplicit 00:17, 24 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Naanna Nenu Naa Boyfriends.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Rathan Meshiek (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

The "own work" claim and self-made licenses are implausible. The image is a promotional poster for a film and certainly copyrighted by the film's production company. —Aɴɢʀ (talk) 14:05, 16 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Nile Clumps Board.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 02:01, 24 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Nile Clumps Board.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Ranger Steve (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

No freedom of panorama for 2D graphic works in the UK. Kelly hi! 16:45, 16 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Is it relevant to this example, given that very little of the text is legible and only half the board is visible? Ranger Steve Talk 16:24, 23 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:VCGuyPenroseGibsonGrave.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 02:01, 24 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:VCGuyPenroseGibsonGrave.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by J.N. Houterman (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

No evidence of permission. Free image available at File:GuyGibson.grave.jpg. Kelly hi! 16:50, 16 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Rolls-Royce Tyne.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 02:01, 24 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Rolls-Royce Tyne.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Ian Dunster (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Free images of this engine available at Commons:Category:Rolls-Royce Tyne. Kelly hi! 16:53, 16 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Danny DeVito Meme.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as G3 by Stifle (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 10:06, 17 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Danny DeVito Meme.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Mr.Smartperson (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Image is an unattributed derivative of File:Danny DeVito cropped and edited for brightness.jpg which was used for vandalism. No foreseeable use for this image. Whpq (talk) 17:29, 16 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Bruce Rauner and Michael Madigan Profile.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F7 by RHaworth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 22:12, 16 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Bruce Rauner and Michael Madigan Profile.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Mrpastry909 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

I don't believe the given fair use rationale is enough to justify using this non-free image over freely licensed photos of Rauner and Madigan. clpo13(talk) 18:05, 16 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.