The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: convert to non-free. With clear cases like this, especially when the uploader is blocked and not responsive, feel free to act boldly. czar 04:19, 2 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:NloodyKnucklesPromoPoster.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Thebigs2update (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

This is not necessarily own work, as it's a film poster. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 08:06, 24 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Convert to NFUR and close. Jon Kolbert (talk) 14:41, 24 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Convert to NFUR, clearly mislabeled. Change to non-free poster and add a fair use. Salavat (talk) 11:45, 27 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F5 by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:02, 5 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:2014USOpensCombinedLogo.svg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Clindberg (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Fails WP:NFCC#3a for 2014 U.S. Women's Open Golf Championship. The other logo is sufficient. Jon Kolbert (talk) 14:29, 24 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The USGA and TV tended to use the combined logo most often during the event, actually.[1] The logo was also in reference to having the same course host both championships back-to-back, which was a first, and is mentioned in the article, so it is interesting separate than just a tournament logo. BTW, I think the new sizes on the logos are much too big. If the template syntax is deprecated, which I don't see references for, there should be a parameter to specify image size. There are different aspect ratios to logos and there should not be a one-size-fits-all size in a template. For that particular pair of tournaments, since both logos were used (and the combined logo most often), I thought both were appropriate to have on the page. Not sure that template uniformity is enough reason to not have them Carl Lindberg (talk) 23:15, 24 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 06:05, 2 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Winter Universiade 2015 Štrbské Pleso Osrblie logo.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by John123521 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Fails WP:NFCC#3a, other logo in 2015 Winter Universiade is sufficient. Jon Kolbert (talk) 15:18, 24 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 06:05, 2 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Teignmouth Electron Adrift 1969.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Hillme (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Require evidence that the book was published without a copyright notice, author has other suspicious uploads – Train2104 (t • c) 18:15, 24 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 06:05, 2 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Mjm teignmouth electron 2006.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Hillme (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

• File:Mjm electron 2017.jpg
• File:Mjm electron 2017 aerial.jpg
• File:Teignmouth electron replica 2017.jpg

Doubtful own work, uploader has a record of copyvio's and license misunderstandings. Note the last image has an OTRS pending tag, but the EXIF data credits a stock photo agency, so it's really unlikely. If OTRS permission comes through it can always be undeleted. – Train2104 (t • c) 18:17, 24 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 06:05, 2 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Sir Felton Elwell Hervey-Bathurst.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Lindsayart (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

It seems ((PD-old-100)) would apply here. Given that the image is free, the full-resolution deleted revision should be restored and the file transferred to Commons. Jon Kolbert (talk) 18:22, 24 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete. czar 04:20, 2 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:The SkyFishermen (band).jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Jasknapp (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

unused promotional image, dubious self-work claim, no foreseeable use FASTILY 20:15, 24 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete. Other related upload on talk page deleted as potential copyright violation. If you do own the rights to this image (e.g., as the photographer), see WP:REFUND. czar 04:22, 2 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Chaudhry Sarwar.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by AliTalpur (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

scanned image, possible derivative work; dubious self-work claim FASTILY 21:00, 24 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Keep ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 01:55, 25 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Pymonenko Fabric trading woman.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Irpen (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Orphaned "keep local" file with a duplicate on Commons. The editor who requested it be kept hasn't edited since 2008 and made quite clear in his last edits that he did not intend to come back. ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 21:33, 24 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep. Not orphaned. Nikkimaria (talk) 01:30, 25 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • You mean "no longer orphaned", as you just added the image to a page. In any event, that is a good outcome, withdrawn. ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 01:55, 25 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F8 by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:02, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Madurodam.JPG (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Sanjaykattimani (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

unused personal image, no encyclopedic use FASTILY 21:44, 24 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Assuming that commons:Category:Madurodam has no FoP issues (haven't looked into it), I'd sooner import to Commons and let them decide if they need another tourist photo. czar 04:26, 2 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 06:05, 2 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Dicka.JPG (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by KevinOwens02 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

EXIF credits "AJAY MAJUMDER". – Train2104 (t • c) 22:45, 24 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.