The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 22:13, 3 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Campbell02.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Cdopeyguy (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

No details on first publication. May not have been published prior to 1923. Orphaned. ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 00:06, 25 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 22:13, 3 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Sweeping.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Petertynan (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Unused. Obviously invalid PD tag. The Crown Copyright has likely expired in the UK, but copyright likely restored in the US via the URAA. ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 01:12, 25 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete No source. Impossible to verify provenance. --Stefan2 (talk) 12:03, 27 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 22:13, 3 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Sugarcoatedsour.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Istapledmyfoot (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

I believe a sheet music representation of a copyrighted song would also be copyrighted. If so, then this is a copyright violation. ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 01:41, 25 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:02, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Acharavi top view.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Viruswitch (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

unused, low-res (washed out), no encyclopedic use FASTILY 04:19, 25 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:02, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Acropora.PNG (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Delldot (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

unused, low-res, no foreseeable use FASTILY 04:26, 25 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 22:13, 3 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:RKSBiometricPassport.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Shikuesi3 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Non free file Used as decoration and not actively discussed in the article in a away that the unfree image is needed to illustrate the point. Therefore fails NFCC #8 Spartaz ^Humbug! 07:10, 25 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 22:13, 3 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Wyattepsclam.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by WestArcherLives (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Virtually identical to standard release. ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 07:41, 25 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 22:13, 3 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Nikka Zaildar 2 Punjabi Film Poster.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Baljeet Bilaspur (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Violation of minimal usage criterion. Another "official" poster has been recently uploaded at File:Nikka Zaildar 2 - Poster.jpg and serves as identification in Nikka Zaildar 2. This older upload of a "First look" poster is now redundant. GermanJoe (talk) 09:48, 25 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 22:13, 3 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Laura Kightlinger 2016 8x10.tif (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Hugomandolin (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

No indication of permission from the photographer, Susan Anderson, nor of how copyright was transferred to Hugomandolin (who anyway shouldn't be claiming it as "own work"). The image is clearly marked "(c)2016 Susan Anderson Photo ALL RIGHTS RESERVED" in the EXIF data. NB, according to WP:COMPLIC, Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 is not a compatible licence for Wikipedia. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 17:32, 25 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete false claim as own work, clearly not fair use (size to large/quality). Widefox; talk 13:49, 28 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 22:13, 3 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Bankrupt.GIF (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Banaticus (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Obsolete -- file isn't used anywhere and there's no information that says what the images are actually about. Banaticus (talk) 17:37, 25 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F8 by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT⚡ 22:13, 3 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Rolex Datejust 116234.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Eternalsleeper (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Uploader photo, but watch shown is a designed item and so may have a separate copyright. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 21:02, 25 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep; pots and pans and TV remotes are also designed, but that doesn't make them copyrightable. Watches are functional objects, so there's no copyright-related limit on what you can photograph with them. Nyttend (talk) 02:18, 27 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep Uncopyrightable in the United States at least, per Nyttend's reasoning. Possibly copyrighted in other countries. As an example, here is a French supreme court ruling where photos of chairs were ruled to violate the copyright of the chairs. Rolex seems to be a Swiss company and I don't know what Swiss law says about utilitarian objects, but the file can at least be kept locally on Wikipedia. --Stefan2 (talk) 12:08, 27 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Withdrawn - 2 different opinions in favour of retention and no deletion votes. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 05:52, 28 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Resolved, see below -FASTILY 20:46, 3 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Pt.JLNGMCH Chamba's Logo.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Vikranthakur (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Not own work necessarily, Third party logo design. In use so perfect candidate for fair use. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 21:12, 25 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Clearly a non-free logo that has been incorrectly licensed. I have updated the file with a fair use and changed the license to non-free logo. Discussion should be good for closure. Salavat (talk) 05:48, 30 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 22:13, 3 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:New Delhi Metro.jpeg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Rumpelstiltskin223 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

There's no obvious indicator of a Creative Commons release at the given source, and the image is not individually credited. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 23:11, 25 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F7 by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:02, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Jesse A Stamps.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Capnet (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Self and fair use - which one? Smaller version exists online. – Train2104 (t • c) 23:40, 25 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I would cite Fair Use - Capnet c 02:08, 26 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

In which case, this image must be deleted as the individual is alive, therefore a replacement could be found. See WP:NFCC#1. – Train2104 (t • c) 11:34, 26 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.