The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT⚡ 05:03, 17 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:St Feichins Mill 7th 8th C ruin.JPG (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by De burgo (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

per c:Commons:Deletion requests/File:Swans of Ireland.jpg Magog the Ogre (t • c) 02:17, 9 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete: copyright contradiction, besides which the author has not been around for 11 years on here, so it's unlikely we can get an OTRS verification. So no real loss. Also see deletion entry below. ww2censor (talk) 09:58, 9 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT⚡ 05:03, 17 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Swans of Ireland.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by De burgo (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

per c:Commons:Deletion requests/File:Swans of Ireland.jpg Magog the Ogre (t • c) 02:17, 9 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete: as I stated at the commons deletion: "because the author has not been around for 11 years on enwiki or here it's unlikely we can get an OTRS verification. So no real loss." ww2censor (talk) 09:53, 9 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: no consensus. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 07:56, 17 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Tomb of Pope Clement XI requiem.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Savidan (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Licensing conflict: The license text appears to say GPL not GFDL. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 19:30, 14 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep Yeah under the GPL. Not a good license for media, but can and should be kept. —innotata 00:22, 15 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment @Innotata: @ShakespeareFan00: the current website for this project - http://requiem-projekt.de/impressum/ - actually says says GFDL. So from that standpoint it would appear to be good. The only hesitation I have is that I used archive.org to go to an old version of the site [1] and it says "Copyright: Images for viewing and use for scientific purposes only. For reproductions, please contact the copyright holder directly." I took a look at some of the pictures on their site, e.g. http://requiem-projekt.de/db/pic_ausgabe.php?pictID=767 and my example photo (not the subject of this IFD) says "Copyright notice: requiem". So I would assume that this means that the Requiem project owns the copyright to my example photo and they have released it under the GFDL. On the other hand, here's a photo http://requiem-projekt.de/db/pic_ausgabe.php?pictID=3245 whose copyright notice says "no entry" and who credits some third party website as the source of the image. So if someone can speak German well enough to navigate the menu at http://requiem-projekt.de/db/ and find this particular photo of Pope Clement's tomb, then we can know whether whether the copyright holder is the Requiem project or not. Unfortunately, the search is via drop down menus and I have no idea what any of them say - you can't just type in "Clement". --B (talk) 14:12, 15 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 05:03, 17 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Depressedmother.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Madsybeath (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Image is sourced to pexels.com which provides a license with quite abit of freedom for use but does not state a specific Creative Commons license. The uploader has stated CC-BY-SA 4.0 as the license but there is no such statement on the license page at pexels. The license does no require attribution, and although it does allow for commercial use, there are restrictions on the commercial use such as "Don't sell unaltered copies of a photo". I don;t think this meets with the licensing requirements for Wikipedia. Whpq (talk) 11:37, 9 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete, orphaned with questionable licensing. Salavat (talk) 23:40, 9 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 05:03, 17 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Jawaharlal nehru stadium during the 2010 Commonwealth Games.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Tigerson1995 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

This Flickr user is a blacklisted flickr user at Commons because their photos are mostly Smithsonian images, many of which are not actually public domain. (That does not mean, however, that NONE of their images are public domain.) For this particular photo, they credit "P D Photo by Debatosh Sengupta" (and that attribution is actually in the photo's EXIF data). But from googling, I think that's a misunderstanding - I believe that "P D" actually refers to the "Photo Division" - http://www.photodivision.gov.in - and this photo is actually copyrighted by the Indian Government Photo Division. B (talk) 19:35, 9 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 05:03, 17 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Indira Gandhi Municipal Stadium Vijayawada.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Anoopstaines (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

"This photo snap draged from the video by modelling studio vijayawada". So ... umm ... copyright violation probably? Unless this is USGS imaging or something. B (talk) 19:38, 9 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: relisted on 2018 October 17. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 07:56, 17 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Larisa Dolina - We are from Jazz.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.