The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 06:03, 29 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Lead - Tokyo Fever (Type A).jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Xenobia4 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

File:Lead - Tokyo Fever (Type B).jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Xenobia4 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

File:Lead - Tokyo Fever (Type C).jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Xenobia4 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Violates WP:NFCC#3, multiple non-free items are being used when one (the main cover File:Lead - Tokyo Fever.jpg) suffices. In Japan, it is standard to release multiple versions with multiple covers for one single, but their use is not justified under policy. ℯxplicit 04:19, 21 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

There are no qualms with the files being removed. I had uploaded them before being aware of the regulations. I meant to delete them a while back ago, but it slipped my mind. Xenobia4 (talk) 00:17, 24 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F8 by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT⚡ 07:06, 21 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Teubner covers Gk.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Wareh (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Not sure what should be done with this image. This is a low-res scan of three book covers of three publications of the Bibliotheca Teubneriana from 1914, 1970, and 2004. Arguably, all three are PD-ineligible. The image itself is tagged with contradictory tags - both a fair use rational and a PD-because tag. If they are fair use, then it's dubious that this qualifies since free images exist, e.g. this 1855 book cover. B (talk) 09:06, 28 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

There was no claim that any of these are PD (though I would have guessed the 1914 one was). The purpose of the image is to show the iconic appearance of volumes in the Bibliotheca Teubneriana series over the years. The covers are minuscule portions of works and fair use. An 1855 book cover would not represent the information, which is what Teubner texts have looked like at different periods during the 20th century. Since Wikipedia articles routinely use "non-free book cover" to illustrate articles on an individual book, and since we have an article on the hundreds and hundreds of books in this series, this very modest and resolution-downgraded selection seems a fortiori to be within normal Wikipedia practice. Wareh (talk) 00:41, 29 August 2018 (UTC) P.S. If I were still actively involved in Wikipedia, I might look into why the image quality was downgraded to this extent. I believe our principles governing illustrating book articles with cover allow better resolution, which would be an improvement. Wareh (talk) 15:53, 29 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Wareh: I didn't even notice that there was a deleted higher-resolution version in the page history. The 1914 book was published in Germany? Germany is life+70 so the author would have to have been deceased since 1947 for it to be public domain. (The name is too generic for me to figure out if he died pre-1947 - maybe someone who speaks German would do better.) I'd be perfectly happy to just say it's PD-ineligible and restore the old image. But I wanted to bring it here for a second opinion. If we decide here that it's not PD-ineligible, then we can't use it under a claim of fair use regardless of the resolution since we have a perfectly good unquestionably PD image we can use. --B (talk) 16:06, 30 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, the 1914 book was published in Leipzig, Germany, and I can't find a biographical sketch of the editor (Karl Wilke) to confirm that he was dead by 1947; I assume Wilke counts as the author for this purpose and not Philodemus, whose text the book is an edition of. I'd certainly enthusiastically endorse your proposed solution ("just say it's PD-ineligible and restore the old image"), if this discussion does not elicit a second opinion that should give serious pause to that course of action. Thanks. Wareh (talk) 20:10, 30 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• PD-ineligible. TOO in Germany is quite high. Same for the US, so we don't need to consider PD-US-1923-abroad. The covers always were in the public domain. – Finnusertop (talk ⋅ contribs) 10:41, 5 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 06:03, 29 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Shane Ramazan TV show title screen.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Shane Ramazan (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Non Free image of a non notable "Shan-E-Ramazan" TV show, uploaded as GFDL. Uploader blocked for spamming. DBigXrayᗙ 08:42, 21 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete, orphaned with no obvious value. Salavat (talk) 13:26, 26 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 06:03, 29 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Tawian-us-beef-import.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by 660gd4qo (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

per c:Commons:Deletion requests/File:Tawian-us-beef-import.jpg Magog the Ogre (t • c) 04:32, 14 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. Nothing in the article currently to suggest that WP:NFCC#8 would be met. – Finnusertop (talk ⋅ contribs) 14:26, 21 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Relicense(d) as non-free. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 09:27, 29 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ready, Woolen and Able.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Corinne le bouch (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

No explanation given for why this is public domain. The uploader was banned for copyright violations, so I assume that it probably needs to be re-tagged as fair use. B (talk) 12:34, 21 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Re-licensed to non-free titled-card and added a fair use. Clearly just a mis-licensed file. Salavat (talk) 13:29, 26 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Relicense(d) as non-free. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 09:27, 29 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Double or Mutton.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Corinne le bouch (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

No explanation given for why this is public domain. The uploader was banned for copyright violations, so I assume that it probably needs to be re-tagged as fair use. B (talk) 12:35, 21 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Re-licensed to non-free titled-card and added a fair use. Clearly just a mis-licensed file. Salavat (talk) 13:31, 26 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Relicense(d) as non-free Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 09:30, 29 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Don't Give Up the Sheep.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Corinne le bouch (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

No explanation given for why this is public domain. The uploader was banned for copyright violations, so I assume that it probably needs to be re-tagged as fair use. B (talk) 12:35, 21 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Re-licensed to non-free titled-card and added a fair use. Clearly just a mis-licensed file. Salavat (talk) 13:32, 26 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Relicense(d) as non-free. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 09:28, 29 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:A Sheep in the Deep.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Corinne le bouch (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

No explanation given for why this is public domain. The uploader was banned for copyright violations, so I assume that it probably needs to be re-tagged as fair use. B (talk) 12:35, 21 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Re-licensed to non-free titled-card and added a fair use. Clearly just a mis-licensed file. Salavat (talk) 13:33, 26 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Relicense(d) as non-free. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 09:28, 29 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Sheep Ahoy.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Corinne le bouch (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

No explanation given for why this is public domain. The uploader was banned for copyright violations, so I assume that it probably needs to be re-tagged as fair use. B (talk) 12:35, 21 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Re-licensed to non-free titled-card and added a fair use. Clearly just a mis-licensed file. Salavat (talk) 13:34, 26 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Relicense(d) as non-free. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 09:29, 29 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Steal Wool.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Corinne le bouch (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

No explanation given for why this is public domain. The uploader was banned for copyright violations, so I assume that it probably needs to be re-tagged as fair use. B (talk) 12:36, 21 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Re-licensed to non-free titled-card and added a fair use. Clearly just a mis-licensed file. Salavat (talk) 13:35, 26 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Relicense(d) as non-free. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 09:29, 29 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Woolen Under Where.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Corinne le bouch (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

No explanation given for why this is public domain. The uploader was banned for copyright violations, so I assume that it probably needs to be re-tagged as fair use. B (talk) 12:36, 21 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Re-licensed to non-free titled-card and added a fair use. Clearly just a mis-licensed file. Salavat (talk) 13:37, 26 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 06:03, 29 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Robert Gagne.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Karhunkynsi244 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

The uploader tagged this image with ((PD-because|It is a photo I took.)). That is not the same as saying "I took this photo and I irrevocably release rights to it" - rather, it merely expresses a mistaken belief that his work intrinsically lacks copyright protection. B (talk) 12:39, 21 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete, essentially orphaned (not used in the main space) with questionable licensing. Salavat (talk) 13:38, 26 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: relisted on 2018 September 29. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 09:32, 29 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:CI Games.svg (delete | talk | history | links | logs)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 06:03, 29 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Rosa Raisa's father Herschel, 1922.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Wikiuserthea (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Something of a mess of a licensing section. It is a 1922 photo from a private family collection. The description page says that it's a Wikipedia-only permission (not a valid license). If it was not published prior to 2002, then it will enter the public domain 70 years after the author's death. We have no idea who the photographer was - or even if the photo was unpublished since Charles Mintzer wrote a book in 2001 about her - https://www.amazon.com/Rosa-Raisa-Biography-Selections-Memoirs/dp/1555535046 - so if he used the photo, then it's copyrighted for a long time. B (talk) 13:13, 21 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 06:03, 29 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Photo portrait of Rosa Raisa, 1927.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Wikiuserthea (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Another private photo from Rosa Raisa - no evidence it was ever published prior to the 2001 book and so no evidence it is PD. B (talk) 13:17, 21 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 06:03, 29 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Rosa Raisa as Aida (1914).jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Wikiuserthea (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Another private photo from Rosa Raisa - this one MIGHT be legitimately PD. A simple photo in the UK created in 1914? B (talk) 13:19, 21 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 06:03, 29 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Rosa Raisa as Francesca da Rimini, 1914.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Wikiuserthea (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Another private photo from Rosa Raisa - probably legitimately PD as it is a simple photo taken in Italy in 1914 B (talk) 13:20, 21 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 06:03, 29 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Rosa Raisa as Rachel in La Juive.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Jchrismucci (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Another private photo from Rosa Raisa - the article claims that this one is from 1922. It looks like a publicity shot and has a copyright notice that says it is from Chicago. So if it really is a publicity still distributed in 1922, it is legitimately PD. B (talk) 13:22, 21 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 06:03, 29 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Scandiani's telegram-Turandot cast selection, 1924.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Wikiuserthea (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

A scan of a telegram from 1924 from Rosa Raisa - probably copyrighted? B (talk) 13:23, 21 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 06:03, 29 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Rosa Raisa as Turandot, 1926.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Wikiuserthea (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Another private photo from Rosa Raisa - simple photo from Italy in 1926 so probably legitimately public domain? B (talk) 13:24, 21 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 06:03, 29 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Rosa Raisa as Maliella in I gioielli della Madonna, 1917.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Wikiuserthea (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Another private photo from Rosa Raisa - 1917 photo from Chicago. Possibly public domain if it was published prior to 1923 B (talk) 13:24, 21 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 06:03, 29 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Rosa Raisa as Norma, 1918.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Wikiuserthea (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Another photo from Rosa Raisa. The photo is from 1918 and the image description page says that the photographer died in 1948. So if it was ever published prior to 1923 it's public domain. Or if it was never published prior to 2003, it will be public domain in a few months. B (talk) 13:26, 21 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 06:03, 29 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Rosa Raisa as Tosca, 1919.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Wikiuserthea (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Another private photo from Rosa Raisa - 1919 photo from Chicago. No evidence it was ever published prior to the 2001 book and so no evidence it is PD. B (talk) 13:27, 21 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 06:03, 29 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Rosa Raisa as Elisabeth in Tannhäuser, 1921.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Wikiuserthea (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Another private photo from Rosa Raisa - 1921 photo - probably legitimately PD - the article implies it was published B (talk) 13:28, 21 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 06:03, 29 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Rosa Raisa as Rachel, 1922.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Wikiuserthea (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Another private photo from Rosa Raisa - from 1922 and looks like a publicity still and has a copyright icon. So may have been published and may be legitimately public domain. B (talk) 13:29, 21 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 06:03, 29 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Rosa Raisa as Gioconda, 1924.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Wikiuserthea (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Another private photo from Rosa Raisa - tagged as fair use. There are some legitimately PD photos here so we don't need this one. It may be legitimately public domain if the copyright was never renewed - the description page says it is publicity material from 1924 B (talk) 13:30, 21 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 06:03, 29 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Giacomo Rimini, Mexico City, 1917.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Wikiuserthea (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Another private photo from Rosa Raisa - unlikely it was ever published prior to the 2001 book and so no evidence it is PD. B (talk) 13:30, 21 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 06:03, 29 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Tromso panorama.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Lindsetmo (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Flickr says "all rights reserved". The uploader matches the last name of the flickr user and originally said "by me", but then struck it out. The uploader has only three contributions - two on this image and one on another. So the question is do we believe that this uploader is the Flickr user? B (talk) 18:05, 21 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete, orphaned with questionable licensing. Salavat (talk) 13:40, 26 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 06:03, 29 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Stairs and lampposts outside the campus library (University of Washington, Tacoma).jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Susan Kemp (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

An IP a few weeks ago added This is actually my photograph. Tim Bostelle. I took this photo on film (slide film) and uploaded it to my flickr account many years ago. This is not available for free use. to the file. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 18:48, 21 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete all uploads by Susan Kemp - https://www.flickr.com/photos/uwtlibrary/3113818895/ has this photo from the "UW Tacoma Library" crediting "Photo by Tim Bostelle". (All of the photos from that era that I clicked on credit him.) If that one is a copyvio, then surely File:UWB.jpg is too, which was edited with the same software two minutes later. All of User:Susan Kemp's photos are web resolution, but these two have different EXIF data than the others. Nearly all of the others are with a Nikon D70. Her latest two photos are with an Olympus camera. She doesn't claim to be the author of any of her uploads and so there is no reason to believe any of them are legitimate. --B (talk) 20:59, 21 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, orphaned with questionable licensing. Salavat (talk) 13:41, 26 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 06:03, 29 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:NPRCFrontFacingBuilding.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by OberRanks (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Husnockcruft. @Future Perfect at Sunrise: The image is cropped from the one at https://www.dpr.com/projects/nara-national-personnel-records-center - ([https://www.dpr.com/assets/projects/_banner/nara-main5.jpg direct image link). This is the construction company that built the National Personnel Records Center, not a government website. (I really don't understand what the point is in fabricating the source when we have perfectly good public domain photos available at https://www.archives.gov/press/press-kits/nprc-st-louis/gallery.html ) B (talk) 21:45, 21 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete as copyright infringement. K.e.coffman (talk) 07:32, 28 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete as copyvio. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 08:36, 28 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.