< September 7 September 9 >

September 8

File:Ana's Cross.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Relisting again --B (talk) 11:32, 18 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ana's Cross.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Gilderien (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Challenging the ((Keep local)). It was originally added citing that this image has no educational value, but I believe it actually does; it depicts a monument in a national park. It's also worth noting the Commons version of this file is being used on another wiki, so obviously it has some cross-wiki value. There doesn't seem to be any compelling reason to keep this copy overlapping the Commons file. ~ Rob13Talk 04:16, 25 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 06:15, 31 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
WP:F8 says that files like this can't be speedily deleted under criterion F8. However, no one is proposing speedy deletion of this file, so the CSD policy doesn't apply.
The general WP:DP doesn't specifically address files like this, but indicates that any file may be deleted at FFD provided that there is a consensus to delete it.
The WP:OWN policy tells that no one owns a page on Wikipedia, i.e. the uploader alone can't decide that the file can't be deleted. The section on user pages indicates that a user doesn't own his own user page, but then indicates that the user has a lot of power over his user page, indicating some kind of partial ownership. The file's only use is on Wikipedia:Adopt-a-user/Adoptee's Area/Adopters, where users are presented in a way somewhat similar to user pages.
WP:NOTHOST indicates that we don't host stuff for the sole purpose of hosting them. The section indicates that unused files are to be deleted, but isn't clear on what to do if hosting a file is unnecessary because the file also is on Commons.
Someone mentioned that the file is in use on a different project. From what I can see, the file is only used on testwiki:Wikipedia:Teahouse/Host breakroom. I'm guessing that this is a test page where someone imported a Wikipedia page for the purpose of testing something and that any other random image could achieve the same testing purpose, so the file's use on that page doesn't really indicate any cross-wiki value. --Stefan2 (talk) 13:12, 2 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 07:22, 8 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Pokemon Go.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: kept - I think most of the people who usually close IFDs participated in this discussion (myself included), but since the Commons logo is not authentic, I don't think anyone has had any objections to keeping this one. If someone objects, feel free to let me know and I will re-post it on the current day. --B (talk) 11:24, 18 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Pokemon Go.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Nall (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Unnecessary, File:Pokémon GO logo.svgSpanishSnake (talk | contribs) 17:42, 25 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 06:22, 31 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Um, I am fairly sure that the Commons file is incorrectly licensed. I'll bring it to deletion requests... Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 06:23, 31 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
It was taken to Commons's DR last year; the result was "kept". George Ho (talk) 20:05, 5 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 07:22, 8 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Sun & Moon, Pauline Smith, 2013.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: relisted again --B (talk) 11:35, 18 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Sun & Moon, Pauline Smith, 2013.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Philafrenzy (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

should be non-free reduced; claim that "People click through to view the image. They don't just view it in the article" by uploader is nonsense FASTILY 05:03, 23 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Fastily see my comment on Smiling Woman Ascending a Stair above. These images are not decoration. They serve an encyclopedic function in the article. Philafrenzy (talk) 19:28, 23 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Besides the file size, the use of the painting as the infobox image seems to violate NFCC#8, since it obviously doesn’t visually identify the artist and there’s no critical commentary. Ytoyoda (talk) 14:37, 23 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
It doesn't need to identify the artist. The image show a piece of her work discussed in the article. I grant you the critical commentary is not extensive but it is there. Philafrenzy (talk) 19:33, 23 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Your response indicates you either don't understand WP:NFCC#3b or have never bothered to read it. -FASTILY 03:44, 31 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
I was replying to Ytoyoda. Enough with the aspersions please Fastily. I have already replied re 3b (minimalism). It does need to be at the minimum size, but not at such low resolution that it ceases to fulfill its encyclopedic function. Philafrenzy (talk) 08:14, 31 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
What is the exact encyclopedic purpose that it requires to be available at a larger resolution than the thumbnail that appears in the infobox? If a higher resolution is necessary to view certain details, then why not crop to show the relevant details? And then if there’s an encyclopedic purpose to the image, what the hell is it doing in the infobox where it’s easentially decorative and fails NFCC#8? Ytoyoda (talk) 04:23, 2 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 14:08, 31 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 07:23, 8 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Wildgonebad.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by B (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 02:01, 16 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Wildgonebad.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Freddy Moloto (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Unencyclopedic: Photo of the uploader (the page deleted), who is not an encyclopedically notable person, the file can not be reasonably used on any page. Ymblanter (talk) 09:30, 8 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Panicinthestreets 1.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: old revision deleted - no evidence it is PD --B (talk) 00:29, 16 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Panicinthestreets 1.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Noirish (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

There is currently a file split request here but I am not certain that the older file is free. And if it isn't it should be deleted per WP:CSD#F5 Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 10:02, 8 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:OpenBroadcaster Logo and Text.jpg,200px.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as G7 by RHaworth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 09:06, 14 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:OpenBroadcaster Logo and Text.jpg,200px.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by RadioRobYukon (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

There is a file split request here but I don't see any worth in having either logo, seeing as both are unused. I also wonder if either version is really simple enough to not be copyrighted, especially the older one. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 10:05, 8 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Jo-Jo, Both are not used and outdated. Please delete both as I am unable. Giving me an administrator permissions issue. Thanks. Rob RadioRobYukon (talk) 23:54, 13 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:OMA airport logo2.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F8 by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT 05:43, 18 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:OMA airport logo2.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Ssredg (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

This file has a split request, but the picture logo version looks like it may be copyrightable and should be deleted if it is so. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 10:07, 8 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Nla.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 02:01, 16 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Nla.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Enlil Ninlil (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

There is a split request on this file but I think we need to clear up the copyright status - does the permission statement refer to the first, the second or both files? Also, both need a better description and a better name. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 10:12, 8 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:CHCTsmall.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 08:44, 18 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:CHCTsmall.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Pnwatt (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

There is a request to split the file but I am not convinced that the older file version is uncopyrightable given the shaded background. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 10:27, 8 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Hamlin Fistula International (logo).jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Old image (which I would assume was an accidental upload anyway) deleted --B (talk) 15:52, 16 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Hamlin Fistula International (logo).jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Amtesfay (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

There is a split request on this file but the older version was uploaded without a copyright tag and tagged for deletion thus. Should it be deleted? Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 10:30, 8 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Wackos.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by B (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 02:01, 16 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Wackos.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Ruy Lopez (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

This file seven years ago was overwritten by a photo. The reuploader did not specify a license and the license that applied to the old photo is clearly inapplicable to the new one. Delete? Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 10:40, 8 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Bathtub (leg style).jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: old revision removed --B (talk) 00:40, 16 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Bathtub (leg style).jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Geometry guy (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

This file has a split request but the August 2009 version should be deleted IMO. It has no specific license attached and it isn't clear whether the license of the bathtub image would apply to it. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 11:11, 8 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Washingtonia filifera landscape.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 02:01, 16 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Washingtonia filifera landscape.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Renatodasil (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

This file consists of two separate images, an older one and one that was uploaded by Staplegunther. Upload summary for the second one says "St. George, Utah landscape by David Jolley" which sounds like it was created by someone else, raising copyright concerns. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 11:33, 8 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Televisionmvlogo.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by B (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 02:01, 16 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Televisionmvlogo.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Ziansh (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Television Maldives has a new logo, is this old one really needed? Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 12:04, 8 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Seal of Jammu and Kashmir.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 02:01, 16 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Seal of Jammu and Kashmir.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Dn9ahx (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

This file is currently displayed not on an article, but on another file and the graphics lab. It consists of two different images and there is apparently a question about whether it meets URAA. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 12:33, 8 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Salem House Area.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 02:01, 16 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Salem House Area.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by RM Gillespie (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

This file contains three images, the currently displaying one and two older ones:

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Refugee-rights rally outside Bank of Queensland.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: deleted orphaned revision --B (talk) 00:58, 16 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Refugee-rights rally outside Bank of Queensland.JPG (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Whywhywhy (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

There is a split request on the second version (wiki screenshot) of this file but it seems unlikely that it would be useful anywhere. And that might be a deletion reason under WP:DEL12 Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 18:56, 8 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Reference Collection.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by B (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 02:01, 16 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Reference Collection.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Wiki.user (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

This file contains actually two images, the first is some kind of userspace file that does not seem to be useful (or more pertinently, in use) for anything and thus merits deletion under WP:DEL12 and the second is a derivative work (of Peanuts) and thus almost certainly copyrighted. Advocate deletion of the whole file. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 19:01, 8 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:BJPenn2.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Closing as the copyvio version has been deleted - I have also added attribution which was missing. --B (talk) 00:55, 16 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:BJPenn2.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by East718 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

This file contains two versions, the second of which Tabercil called a "clear copyvio". If that's so it should probably be deleted. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 19:12, 8 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for pointing that out. Don't know why I didn't delete it at that time on that basis. I've just fixed that omission. Tabercil (talk) 22:12, 8 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Charles Henry de Soysa-2.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by B (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 02:01, 16 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Charles Henry de Soysa-2.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Rippleworth (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

I've just split this file from File:Charles Henry de Soysa.jpg but the copyright license appears to be incorrect and an identical file was already deleted at File:Prince of Wales College Moratuwa.jpg.jpg Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 19:42, 8 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Magnolia-CMS-screenshot.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 02:01, 16 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Magnolia-CMS-screenshot.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Bkraft (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

This file has two different images, both screenshots of the software in question. The source is a bare link and looking at the legal page of the source website I do not see any clear licensing statement for either. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 20:05, 8 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Larry Sharpe, Libertarian.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: relisted on Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2018_September_18#File:Abelard_Sign.JPG --B (talk) 11:29, 18 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Larry Sharpe, Libertarian.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Ghoul flesh (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

The current file was already subject of a discussion, but the two previous files in the history ... do we have a license statement for them as well? Paging @Jeff G. and Ghoul flesh: Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 20:09, 8 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Jo-Jo Eumerus, Ghoul flesh, Whpq, AMK152, and Madman2001: There are three photos in the history. The first (with the gray brick background) was uploaded 18:17, 17 March 2018 (UTC). The second (with the black background) was uploaded with a comment mentioning https://i.imgur.com/2bSJXli.png 11 minutes later at 18:28. The third, a crop of the second, was uploaded two minutes after that at 18:30. The OTRS ticket originated four days later, on 21 March. The ticket covers the second photo, and by extension the third. I asked if it covers the first on 30 June in response to Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2018 March 17#File:Larry Sharpe, Libertarian.jpg and what became User talk:Jeff G./Archives/2018/July#File:Larry Sharpe, Libertarian.jpg, but I have not received a reply in the intervening two months. I concur with Stefan2 that the first now "needs to be deleted per WP:F5."   — Jeff G. ツ 01:31, 10 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Imago dei.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: deleted - I have speedied the article per A7/G11 - their website is gone and even when it existed, it barely had any content. This college doesn't seem to have ever even existed and most of the G-hits are downstream from the Wikipedia article or for an unrelated church in North Carolina. It's sad that stuff made up in school church one day lasts so long. --B (talk) 12:19, 16 September 2018 (UTC)))[reply]

File:Imago dei.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Zortex93 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Such logos are usually not freely licensed and the archived website of the college says "All rights reserved". Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 20:39, 8 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.