The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 14 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:Wernicke.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by A314268 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

superseded by superior quality File:Carl Wernicke.JPG. Magog the Ogre (t • c) 02:44, 6 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete: I had hoped that tagging the image as Now Commons (even though not the exact same version) would expedite or obviate such a process as this. No valid reason to keep low quality versions on Wikipedia. --Animalparty! (talk) 02:48, 6 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, redundant to Commons file. Salavat (talk) 13:19, 7 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: relisted on 2019 January 18. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 07:02, 18 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:Soviet Major General Aleksandr Dmitrievich Berezin.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: no consensus. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 07:03, 18 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:High Hopes (White Panda Remix).jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by H9v9n9 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

The song doesn't have its own cover except for this remix cover. Since this isn't actually for the original track it might not be appropriate for the article. Jc86035 (talk) 11:42, 27 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep Since there is no other cover the song, the remix cover passes WP:NFCC#3a. As long as the cover is captioned as being the remix cover, which it currently is, it should be able to be used in the infobox for identification purposes. Aspects (talk) 06:54, 6 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• @Aspects: is that the typical practice and is it documented somewhere? From clicking around, the only singles with covers I saw were ones where the single had its own album cover. --B (talk) 12:37, 13 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I am not sure how typical the situation is of the original single not having a cover and a remix having one and I could not find it documented anywhere. I still feel that as longer as it is captioned like it is the remix cover passes WP:NFCC#3. Aspects (talk) 06:50, 15 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - first of all, showing the remix artwork in the infobox at the top of the article is misleading. Since it can't be used anywhere else, it should be deleted. The remix is not even mentioned in the article. ‡ Єl Cid of ᐺalencia ^ᐐT₳LKᐬ 18:40, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F9 by CactusWriter (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:00, 9 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:Irfanraza.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Syedishujaat (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Claim of own work is dubious. Uploader has other copyright violations here at the English wikipedia and at Commons. The EXIF on the file indicates this is lifted from Facebook. Whpq (talk) 15:18, 6 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Speedy Delete -- photo is copied from an Instagram image at https://www.instagram.com/p/BhJ0I-4F1CG/. — CactusWriter ^(talk) 23:02, 8 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 16:47, 6 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:MarioUltimate.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Mikeedee998 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Unlikely to be own work by the uploader. Stefan2 (talk) 16:08, 6 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Speedy Delete - character from a copyrighted video game -- Whpq (talk) 16:15, 6 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 16:47, 6 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:Mariocharacters.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Mikeedee998 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Unlikely to be own work by the uploader. Stefan2 (talk) 16:09, 6 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Speedy Delete - character from a copyrighted video game -- Whpq (talk) 16:15, 6 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 16:48, 6 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:LuigiNewSuperMarioBrosUDeluxe.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Mikeedee998 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Unlikely to be own work by the uploader. Stefan2 (talk) 16:09, 6 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Speedy Delete - character from a copyrighted video game -- Whpq (talk) 16:15, 6 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: speedy Delete. FfD already closed once as delete but is pending as the file is facing technical problems while deleting it. Wikipedia:Files_for_discussion/2018_November_10#File:Dr._Richard_Pierzchajlo,_Head_Shot,_2017.jpg file already moved to commons so speedy criteria F8 applies. (non-admin closure) DBigXrayᗙ 22:36, 6 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:Dr. Richard Pierzchajlo, Head Shot, 2017.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by NoahPierzchajlo (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Photo for abandoned draft: Draft:Richard Pierzchajlo Magog the Ogre (t • c) 22:27, 6 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F4 by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 14 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:Scientific Evidence demonstrating female attraction to Gangsterish Thugs.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Putin strategy (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

This is a screenshot of a paper that isn't use anywhere and is likely never to be. Jorm (talk) 22:48, 6 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

It was for this edit I'm guessing.[1] The article is this one. It is used, I'm afraid.[2] This is clearly copyvio. I've dropped a DS notice on the poster's page. I'm not sure where this image came from[3] but it's also pointy. Doug Weller talk 10:35, 7 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete, orphaned with questionable licensing. Salavat (talk) 13:21, 7 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: relisted on 2019 January 18. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 07:04, 18 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:Urban Light at night.JPG (delete | talk | history | links | logs)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.