< August 13	August 15 >

August 14

File:Mapúa University Horizontal Logo.png

Two versions of a logo are not needed for purposes of primary identification. File:Mapúa University logo.png is the main logo and this is just a horizontal version. Logos are substantially similar. Fails WP:NFCC#3a. Whpq (talk) 03:16, 14 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Chrome Logo.svg

Does not satisfy WP:NFCC#8. The image is not used as the primary means of visual identification. The use of historical, former, alternate or anniversary logos for an entity is not allowed, unless the logo itself is described in the context of sourced critical commentary about that logo. Jonteemil (talk) 17:13, 14 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep due to its use in Flat design, where its presence provides critical commentary for the article. schetm (talk) 04:14, 16 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - The image is used in two articles. For Google Chrome, it is not being used for identification, and the nomination covers the reason for deletion. The nomination fails to account for its use in flat design. The stated purpose of the non-free usage rationale for flat design is "Demonstration of the article's subject, by comparing different versions of the logo produced under different design principles. Because of Google's role in promoting this style of design, a visual demonstration of how they have applied it to their own products is particularly relevant to understanding it." Those are two purposes to consider. The first purpose of design illustration fails WP:NFCC#1 as the VW logos are a free equivalent. For the second purpose there is actually no commentary about Google's design or its importance there at all. As it stands, the usage fails WP:NFCC#8. -- Whpq (talk) 15:57, 16 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Its use in flat design is not necessary because there's already a freely licensed series (VW) there. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 18:21, 16 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:New York Islanders logo (1995–97).svg

Keep - the logo was infamous, and its infamy is described in the paragraph directly above the logo. To quote the nom, "the logo itself is described in the context of sourced critical commentary about that logo." schetm (talk) 04:17, 16 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

It must be "sourced critical commentary" and there are literally zero sources in the logo section of New York Islanders, see New York Islanders#Logo.Jonteemil (talk) 16:38, 16 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Would agree, but since it is now sourced, Keep. SixFourThree (talk) 16:17, 18 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep for the NY Islanders article and remove from the season article. I have added sourcing for the egregious disaster that was the NY Islander's fisherman logo. -- Whpq (talk) 17:47, 16 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Hyundai A-League logo (2004–2017).svg

File:Former MUTV logo (2).png

File:Canadiens100Anniversary.png

Keep as the logo in question doesn't pass the threshold of originality for copyright. schetm (talk) 04:18, 16 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Chicago Blackhawks logo (1937-1955).png

Agreed - Delete. SixFourThree (talk)SixFourThree

File:Washington Capitals Logo 1995–2002.svg

File:NewDevils.png

Agreed - Delete. SixFourThree (talk)SixFourThree

File:American Airlines logo.svg

Keep. The logo is described and referred to in the section, which could be expanded if necessary. Cloudbound (talk) 18:25, 15 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - I have expanded the logo subsection a bit more, and adjusted the NFUR to reflect the purpose of for having this historical logo in the body of the article. The logo is the subject of sourced commentary and meets WP:NFCC#8. -- Whpq (talk) 00:04, 16 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Badminton World Federation (logo).svg

File:The Football League.png

File:Washington Capitals Home Logo 2002–2007.svg

Agreed - Delete. SixFourThree (talk)SixFourThree

File:Tottenham Hotspur old logo.png

File:OldDevils.png

File:Celticfc100.png

File:Celtic 50th Anniversary of Lisbon Lions 1967 (2017–18).jpg

File:Washington Caps Alternate.svg

Agreed - Delete. SixFourThree (talk)SixFourThree

File:CelticCrest1977.jpg

File:NewZealandFootballChampionship.jpg

File:Aston Villa.svg

File:Former MUTV logo.png

File:NewYorkIslandersOld.svg

Agreed - Delete. SixFourThree (talk)SixFourThree

File:Badminton World Federation (logo).jpg

I uploaded that image (logo) fourteen years ago when it was the active logo. I don't have a lot at stake here. I can inform everyone here, that whoever wrote the cited so-called 'policy' is out of their minds and I don't even have to be a lawyer to say that (which I am not, btw). There is no standard that one has to critique a former logo in order to use it for identification. This is beyond the pale. It is on the level of saying we should not have the 48-star US flag on Wikipedia because there are now 50 stars and the old one can't possibly be used unless you condemn the addition of Alaska and Hawaii. This is incredibly stupid. I really don't care much about the logo, but the logic being used here is insane and must be stopped before it destroys Wikipedia as a whole. --SVTCobra 02:18, 15 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@SVTCobra: Flags, unlike logos, are often public domain and thus not goverened by copyright.Jonteemil (talk) 05:34, 15 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Yes. I know. And therefore it was perhaps not the best example. But my point is, there's no "critique" requirement in fair-use law. Critique is merely one of the things that could make use pass the the fair-use test. But educational and informational identification is a much stronger component of the relevant code. --SVTCobra 10:14, 15 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

While I understand what you're saying, Wikipedia's non-free content use policy was set up to be more restrictive than fair use per WP:NFC#Background and WP:ITSFAIRUSE and it's been that way almost since the when the policy was established. If Wikipedia's policy was equivalent to fair use (at least the US's concept of fair use), non-free images of any type could pretty much be used in any article. When the olicy was first being developed it was decided that was not a good thing; however, whether that is something that makes more sense now per WP:CCC is perhaps something worth discussing, but that discussion probably needs to take place at WT:NFCC or WP:VPP since it cannot be resolved here.

As for this particular logo, the long-standing consensus when it comes to non-free former logo use is pretty much as stated in WP:NFC#cite_note-4. Generally, WP:NFG doesn't really allow non-free images to be used in an image gallery because such use tend to be primarily WP:DECORATIVE as opposed to contextual and non-free former logos which are simply moved to body of the article once they are replaced in the main infobox tend to have problems per WP:NFCC#8. In Badminton World Federation#Logo there is some content about the BWF's change in branding over the years, but whether that requires that the two non-free files actually be seen for that content to be understood seems IMO to not be the case per not only NFCC#8, but also WP:FREER (WP:NFCC#1). So, if there's anything more (i.e. sourced commentary) that can be added about the BWF's change in branding that perhaps explains the reasons why it changed logos or why these former logos were selected, then that might strengthen the case for each former logo's non-free use. It has to be something better than simple statements which simply describe the logos or state that they were just changed at some point in time. -- Marchjuly (talk) 10:37, 15 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:National Lacrosse League (logo).svg

File:Ottawasenatorsjerseys.PNG

Agreed - Delete. SixFourThree (talk)SixFourThree

File:Tampa Bay Lightning.svg

Agreed - Delete. SixFourThree (talk)SixFourThree

File:Miami Dolphins wordmark 1997-2012.png

Keep as the logo in question doesn't pass the threshold of originality for copyright. schetm (talk) 21:03, 16 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Disagree with Schetm. This one is too complex for PD-simple. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 04:38, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:TampaBayLightningAlternate.svg

Agreed - Delete. SixFourThree (talk)SixFourThree

File:Faxe Kondi Ligaen.png

File:Los Angeles Kings Logo 1967-1982.svg

File:Aston Villa FC logo (2000-2007).svg

File:Eintracht Frankfurt historial.png

File:Minnesota Wild Alternate.svg

Keep as the logo in question doesn't pass the threshold of originality for copyright. schetm (talk) 21:03, 16 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Disagree with Schetm. This one is too complex for PD-simple. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 04:38, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Los Angeles Kings.svg

File:5th Anniversary.jpg

File:Minnesota Wild alternate logo.svg

Agreed - Delete. SixFourThree (talk)SixFourThree

File:BBC Two Paint ident.jpg

Keep per the very detailed fair use rationale on the image description page - that should cover the nom's concerns. schetm (talk) 23:44, 16 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: It's the article content which the non-free use should reflect, not what's written in the nfur. This file is being used in three articles and the problem with this nomination is that it's not clear whether only some or all of those uses are problems, and I think it's important to asses each use separately. History of BBC television idents has 25 non-free files being used in it, which I think is the most of any current article. To me it seems like a sort of a "discography for BBC news indents" with lots of redundant content that can be found in individual articles. To problem with non-free files being used in multiple articles is that not all the uses are equivalent so just !voting delete or keep without specifying which uses implies that all the uses are equivalent. There's nothing in relevant policy that states that a file can only be used in one article or one time; policy does, however, require us to minimize non-free use as much as we can and that might be something worth discussing with respect to not only this file, but all the files used in the ident history article. -- Marchjuly (talk) 00:02, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- Does it really need to be used in three articles though? That doesn't to me as minimal use.Jonteemil (talk) 03:37, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  - It might not be, but your original post doesn't distinguish between the different uses in different articles; this is another problem with the kind of mass nomination of files that you did. It's not clear whether you're suggesting that all of the file's non-free uses aren't compliant or just some aren't compliant. For example, the use in BBC Two '1991–2001' idents might actually be OK since the article itself seems to be particularly about this former ident or the series of idents it was part of, i.e. it's used as the primary means of identification of the subject of the article in a sense; so, that's not really a case of WP:NFC#cite_note-4. The uses in the other two articles are not so clear, but the one in BBC 2#Presentation seems like it could be OK depending how redundant you think the content in that section is to the 1991-2001 history article. The use in the more broader BBC indent history, on the other hand, article seems unnecessary in my opinion per item 6 of WP:NFC#UUI. Anyway, the point is that this is a file with three uses and some of these uses might be OK. This makes this particular discussion a bit more complex than perhaps some of the other files you nominated and thus this file shouldn't have been bunched in with all the others. -- Marchjuly (talk) 04:36, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:LosAngelesKings1988.svg

Agreed - Delete. SixFourThree (talk)SixFourThree

File:2016–18 Malaysian FA Cup Logo.png

File:Oakland Seals Logo 1967–1970.svg

File:TBL Logo-Old.svg

File:Los Angeles Kings Alternate Logo.svg

Agreed - Delete. SixFourThree (talk)SixFourThree

File:LosAngelesKings1982.png

File:ASB-Premiership.png

File:Minnesota@vikings.50th anniversarylogo.gif

Keep: This logo does seem to be used for primary identification purpose of 2010 Minnesota Vikings season. It was the teams 50th anniversary season and logos for specific season are often allowed per items 14 and 17 of WP:NFC#UUI. If this was simply randomly added somewhere in Minnesota Vikings, then perhaps being a former logo would be a problem per WP:NFC#cite_note-4, but that doesn't seem to be the case at all. -- Marchjuly (talk) 04:40, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Channel 5 1997 ident, Variant I.jpeg

File:MontrealCanadiens1918.png

Keep as the logo in question doesn't pass the threshold of originality for copyright. schetm (talk) 03:14, 16 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Oneworld 10 Years Anniversary.svg

Keep as the logo in question doesn't pass the threshold of originality for copyright. schetm (talk) 03:15, 16 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:HSV Hamburg.png

Keep as the logo in question doesn't pass the threshold of originality for copyright. schetm (talk) 03:15, 16 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:OHSAA 100 Anniversary logo.png

File:Nashville Predators Alternate Logo.svg

Agreed - Delete. SixFourThree (talk)SixFourThree

File:Nordiques proposed - accurate colours.jpg

Keep - this one fits the exception to the ban on historical logos. SixFourThree (talk) 16:30, 18 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Mega 1075 old.png

Keep as the logo in question doesn't pass the threshold of originality for copyright. schetm (talk) 03:16, 16 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:FöreningsSparbanken (logo).jpg

File:Ott sens campaign.png

File:Ottawa sens logo old.svg

File:Bridgefm 2.png

Keep as the logo in question doesn't pass the threshold of originality for copyright. schetm (talk) 03:17, 16 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Columbus Blue Jackets Logo 2000 - 2007.svg

File:Nordiques proposed logo - correct colours.jpg

Keep - this one fits the exception to the ban on historical logos. SixFourThree (talk) 16:31, 18 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:MGM Ident 1956-57.jpg

Keep. The logo itself is the subject of sourced critical commentary in the article Leo the Lion (MGM), in the section "George (1956–1958)", which discusses the specific lion that appeared in this logo.--Tdl1060 (talk) 01:08, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per NFCC 8 and 3a. Coverage is trivial for any one lion, and there's no need for a large number of substantially similar non-free images. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 04:41, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Logo md earlier.png

File:Bridgefm 1.png

Keep as the logo in question doesn't pass the threshold of originality for copyright. schetm (talk) 03:18, 16 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Swansea City AFC logo (100th anniversary).svg

File:MSV Duisburg historical.png

Keep as the logo in question doesn't pass the threshold of originality for copyright. schetm (talk) 03:19, 16 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Disagree with Schetm. This one is too complex for PD-simple. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 04:41, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:NZL Premiership (2016–17).jpg

File:Comoros FA.png

File:PHXold.svg

File:MGM Ident 1938.jpg

Keep. The logo itself is the subject of sourced critical commentary in the article Leo the Lion (MGM), in the section "Tanner (1934–1956)", which discusses the specific lion that appeared in this logo.--Tdl1060 (talk) 01:11, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:MGM Ident 1928.jpg

Keep. The logo itself is the subject of sourced discussion in the article Leo the Lion (MGM), in the section "Jackie (1928–1956)", which discusses the specific lion that appeared in this logo.--Tdl1060 (talk) 00:36, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per NFCC 8 and 3a. Coverage is trivial for any one lion, and there's no need for a large number of substantially similar non-free images. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 04:42, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Calgary Flames horse head logo.svg

File:StLouisBlues1967.svg

File:MPKB-BRI U-BES F.C. 2017 Logo.png

File:CDVictoria.png

File:Seattle Reign FC crest (primary), 2013.png

Agreed - Delete. SixFourThree (talk)SixFourThree

File:Whalers 10th Anniversary Logo.png

Agreed - Delete. SixFourThree (talk)SixFourThree

File:AirAsiaAllstarsFCLogo.jpg

Keep as the logo in question doesn't pass the threshold of originality for copyright. schetm (talk) 03:21, 16 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Disagree with schetm. This is too complex for PD-simple. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 04:43, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:NewEnglandWhalers.png

File:Aer Arann Express logo.svg

Keep: actually this logo looks like it should be ((PD-textlogo)) and transferred to the commons. ww2censor (talk) 11:04, 15 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep and relicense to ((PD-ineligible-USonly)), under TOO in US, but copyright status in source country is unclear (see c:COM:TOO Ireland). Wikiacc (¶) 02:33, 16 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep as the logo in question doesn't pass the threshold of originality for copyright. schetm (talk) 03:22, 16 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Liga Malaysia Logo 2004.png

File:Mega 1075 new.png

Keep as the logo in question doesn't pass the threshold of originality for copyright. schetm (talk) 03:22, 16 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Disagree with schetm. This is too complex for PD-simple. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 04:43, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Djibouti FA.png

File:S-Cards map.PNG

File:Angels50.svg

Keep as the logo in question doesn't pass the threshold of originality for copyright. schetm (talk) 03:23, 16 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Mgm-roast beef and movies.jpg

Keep. The logo itself is the subject of sourced critical commentary in the article Leo the Lion (MGM), in the section "Telly (1928–1932) and Coffee (1932–1935)", which discusses the specific lion (Coffee) that appeared in this logo.--Tdl1060 (talk) 01:01, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per NFCC 8 and 3a. Coverage is trivial for any one lion, and there's no need for a large number of substantially similar non-free images. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 04:44, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Liga Futsal Kebangsaan 2017 Logo.png

File:Liga Malaysia Logo 2011.jpg

File:MPKB-BRI U-BES F.C. Logo.png

File:StLouisBlues1990s.png

Agreed - Delete. SixFourThree (talk)SixFourThree

File:1075TheOasis2003.png

Keep as the logo in question doesn't pass the threshold of originality for copyright. schetm (talk) 03:24, 16 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:CFN-CNBC logo.png

File:UEFA Euro 1976 logo.svg

File:Liga Malaysia Logo pre2004.png

Keep as the logo in question doesn't pass the threshold of originality for copyright. schetm (talk) 03:24, 16 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Disagree with Schetm. This one is too complex for PD-simple. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 04:44, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:FC Yerevan Logo.png

File:UEFA Euro 1980 logo.svg

File:1075TheOasis1992.png

File:MGM logo used in the movie "2001 A Space Odyssey".jpg

Keep per WP:NFCC#8, as there is discussion about this particular lion located directly to the left of this image in the article. Loosing the image would "be detrimental to (the) understanding" of the evolution of the lion. schetm (talk) 03:29, 16 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. The logo itself is the subject of sourced critical commentary in the article Leo the Lion (MGM), in the section "Leo (1957–present)", which discusses this "Stylized Lion" logo designed by Lippincott.--Tdl1060 (talk) 01:16, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per above as there is commentary. -DJSasso (talk) 12:29, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Olympia Alzey.png

Keep as the logo in question doesn't pass the threshold of originality for copyright. schetm (talk) 03:36, 16 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Disagree with Schetm. This seems too complex to be PD-simple. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 04:32, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:CBBC 1997 Man and Dog.jpg

File:Coca-Cola Ligaen 1995.jpg

File:Bridge FM.svg

Keep as the logo in question doesn't pass the threshold of originality for copyright. schetm (talk) 03:38, 16 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:J3 League (Horizontal).png

Keep as the logo in question doesn't pass the threshold of originality for copyright. schetm (talk) 03:38, 16 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Winnipeg Jets Inaugural Logo.png

File:Discovery Networks EMEA.png

File:West-Bromwich-Albion-F.C.-old-logo.png

File:CocaColaAmatilBrand.svg

Keep as the logo in question doesn't pass the threshold of originality for copyright. schetm (talk) 03:39, 16 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Disagree with Schetm. This one is too complex for PD-simple. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 04:45, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: This is probably too complex per c:COM:TOO Australia, but it might be PD per c:COM:TOO United States. If that's the consensus, the file's licensing could be converted to ((PD-ineligible-USonly)) for local use on English Wikipedia. The text is obvious not eligible for copyright protection; so, that just leaves the sphere. It doesn't seem to have ay complex imagery of 3D effects, but bascially seems to be nothing more than a white circle with some red and gray "stripes" added to it. -- Marchjuly (talk) 05:20, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Former Uni-link (Minerva Accord) logo.png

Keep as the logo in question doesn't pass the threshold of originality for copyright. Seriously, did the nom even look at it? schetm (talk) 03:40, 16 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:3. Liga logo (2017).svg

File:J2 League (Horizontal).png

Keep as the logo in question doesn't pass the threshold of originality for copyright. schetm (talk) 03:40, 16 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Vegas Golden Knights secondary logo.png

Agreed - Delete. SixFourThree (talk)SixFourThree

File:2013 Malaysian President's Cup Logo.png

File:Tampabaydevilrays10thanniversarypatch.gif

I don't know about this one, but am leaning towards Keep. It is being used as the primary means of visual identification in the Infobox, which has long been allowed. I do think that if we're going to start restricting Infoboxes, we should have that conversation over there to involve the maximum amount of input. SixFourThree (talk) 16:12, 18 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Minnesota North Stars Logo 1967-1974.svg

Keep as the logo in question doesn't pass the threshold of originality for copyright. schetm (talk) 03:41, 16 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep for that reason. This logo image consists only of simple geometric shapes or text. It does not meet the threshold of originality needed for copyright protection, and is therefore in the public domain. Should be re-tagged with Template:PD-logo. SixFourThree (talk) 15:02, 18 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ermiszonianafc.jpg

File:Banistmo logo.png

Keep as the logo in question doesn't pass the threshold of originality for copyright. schetm (talk) 03:43, 16 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:J.League Division 2.png

File:NT Nitros old logo.png

Comment The old logo and change is discussed in the article commentary and I see many sports teams showing logo history in their pages. RedPatchBoy (talk) 13:25, 18 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per Wiki policy on historical logos. SixFourThree (talk) 16:13, 18 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:3F Superliga Logo.jpg

Keep as the logo in question doesn't pass the threshold of originality for copyright. schetm (talk) 03:43, 16 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:AEK Men's V.C. official logo.jpg

File:2013 FAM League Logo.png

File:Dunhill Piala FA Logo.png

File:Winnipeg Jets 2011.png

Agreed - Delete. SixFourThree (talk)SixFourThree

File:J3 League Logo.gif

Keep as the logo in question doesn't pass the threshold of originality for copyright. schetm (talk) 03:44, 16 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:National League.png

File:Nef-interview-vibe-compressed.jpg

Delete. Possible copyright violation. Hechosinutiles (talk) 20:27, 14 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete as F9, source here. Wikiacc (¶) 02:39, 16 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Marlins cap insignia.svg

Keep - the MLB infobox specifically has an entry for current cap logos. The discussion should begin with whether that is optimal, rather than indiscriminately tagging every single individual logo. SixFourThree (talk) 15:06, 18 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:San Diego Padres (2020) cap logo.svg

Keep as the logo in question doesn't pass the threshold of originality for copyright. schetm (talk) 03:46, 16 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep for that reason, and that the MLB infobox specifically has an entry for current cap logos. The discussion should begin with whether that is optimal, rather than indiscriminately tagging every single individual logo. SixFourThree (talk) 15:07, 18 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:St. Louis Cardinals Cap Insignia.png

Keep as the logo in question doesn't pass the threshold of originality for copyright. schetm (talk) 03:47, 16 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep for that reason, and that the MLB infobox specifically has an entry for current cap logos. The discussion should begin with whether that is optimal, rather than indiscriminately tagging every single individual logo. SixFourThree (talk) 15:07, 18 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Baltimore Orioles cap.svg

Keep - the image is the primary means of visual identification in the infobox. schetm (talk) 03:46, 16 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Seattle Mariners Insignia.svg

Keep - the MLB infobox specifically has an entry for current cap logos. The discussion should begin with whether that is optimal, rather than indiscriminately tagging every single individual logo. SixFourThree (talk) 15:08, 18 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:BuffaloBisons13cap.PNG

Keep - the Minor League Baseball infobox specifically has an entry for current cap logos. The discussion should begin with whether that is optimal, rather than indiscriminately tagging every single individual logo. SixFourThree (talk) 15:09, 18 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Aviators cap.png

Keep - the Minor League Baseball infobox specifically has an entry for current cap logos. The discussion should begin with whether that is optimal, rather than indiscriminately tagging every single individual logo. SixFourThree (talk) 15:09, 18 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Red Wings cap.png

Keep - the Minor League Baseball infobox specifically has an entry for current cap logos. The discussion should begin with whether that is optimal, rather than indiscriminately tagging every single individual logo. SixFourThree (talk) 15:10, 18 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:IndianapolisIndiansCap.png

Keep - the Minor League Baseball infobox specifically has an entry for current cap logos. The discussion should begin with whether that is optimal, rather than indiscriminately tagging every single individual logo. SixFourThree (talk) 15:10, 18 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:OKC Dodgers cap.PNG

Keep as the logo in question doesn't pass the threshold of originality for copyright. schetm (talk) 03:49, 16 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep for that reason, and that the Minor League Baseball infobox specifically has an entry for current cap logos. The discussion should begin with whether that is optimal, rather than indiscriminately tagging every single individual logo. SixFourThree (talk) 15:10, 18 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:CharlotteKnightsCap.png

Keep - the Minor League Baseball infobox specifically has an entry for current cap logos. The discussion should begin with whether that is optimal, rather than indiscriminately tagging every single individual logo. SixFourThree (talk) 15:11, 18 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Tacoma Rainiers cap logo.png

Keep as the logo in question doesn't pass the threshold of originality for copyright. schetm (talk) 03:49, 16 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep for that reason, and that the Minor League Baseball infobox specifically has an entry for current cap logos. The discussion should begin with whether that is optimal, rather than indiscriminately tagging every single individual logo. SixFourThree (talk) 15:11, 18 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:TennesseeSmokiesCap.png

Keep as the logo in question doesn't pass the threshold of originality for copyright. schetm (talk) 03:49, 16 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep for that reason, and that the Minor League Baseball infobox specifically has an entry for current cap logos. The discussion should begin with whether that is optimal, rather than indiscriminately tagging every single individual logo. SixFourThree (talk) 15:12, 18 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Memphis Redbirds cap.PNG

Keep - the Minor League Baseball infobox specifically has an entry for current cap logos. The discussion should begin with whether that is optimal, rather than indiscriminately tagging every single individual logo. SixFourThree (talk) 15:12, 18 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:SouthBendCubscap.png

Keep - the Minor League Baseball infobox specifically has an entry for current cap logos. The discussion should begin with whether that is optimal, rather than indiscriminately tagging every single individual logo. SixFourThree (talk) 15:12, 18 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:CedarRapidsKernelsCapLogo.PNG

Keep - the Minor League Baseball infobox specifically has an entry for current cap logos. The discussion should begin with whether that is optimal, rather than indiscriminately tagging every single individual logo. SixFourThree (talk) 15:13, 18 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Loons cap.PNG

Keep - the Minor League Baseball infobox specifically has an entry for current cap logos. The discussion should begin with whether that is optimal, rather than indiscriminately tagging every single individual logo. SixFourThree (talk) 15:13, 18 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Salt Lake Bees cap insignia.svg

Keep - the Minor League Baseball infobox specifically has an entry for current cap logos. The discussion should begin with whether that is optimal, rather than indiscriminately tagging every single individual logo. SixFourThree (talk) 15:13, 18 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Snappers cap.PNG

Keep - the Minor League Baseball infobox specifically has an entry for current cap logos. The discussion should begin with whether that is optimal, rather than indiscriminately tagging every single individual logo. SixFourThree (talk) 15:14, 18 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Lowell Spinners cap.PNG

Keep - the Minor League Baseball infobox specifically has an entry for current cap logos. The discussion should begin with whether that is optimal, rather than indiscriminately tagging every single individual logo. SixFourThree (talk) 15:14, 18 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:IF Chukars cap.PNG

Keep - the Minor League Baseball infobox specifically has an entry for current cap logos. The discussion should begin with whether that is optimal, rather than indiscriminately tagging every single individual logo. SixFourThree (talk) 15:14, 18 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:BoiseHawksCapLogo.PNG

Keep - the Minor League Baseball infobox specifically has an entry for current cap logos. The discussion should begin with whether that is optimal, rather than indiscriminately tagging every single individual logo. SixFourThree (talk) 15:14, 18 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Hartford Yard Goats Cap Logo.png

Keep - the Minor League Baseball infobox specifically has an entry for current cap logos. The discussion should begin with whether that is optimal, rather than indiscriminately tagging every single individual logo. SixFourThree (talk) 15:15, 18 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Rocky Mountain Vibes cap logo.png

Keep - the Minor League Baseball infobox specifically has an entry for current cap logos. The discussion should begin with whether that is optimal, rather than indiscriminately tagging every single individual logo. SixFourThree (talk) 15:15, 18 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Gnats cap.PNG

Keep - the Minor League Baseball infobox specifically has an entry for current cap logos. The discussion should begin with whether that is optimal, rather than indiscriminately tagging every single individual logo. SixFourThree (talk) 15:15, 18 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:DROS Men Hna.JPG

Unused, uncategorized; see c:Commons:Deletion requests/File:DROS Men Hna.JPG. Magog the Ogre (t • c) 23:15, 14 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Nokia N70 2.jpg

see c:Commons:Deletion requests/File:Nokia N70 2.jpg. Magog the Ogre (t • c) 23:17, 14 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:KCMonarchs42a.JPG

Keep as the logo in question doesn't pass the threshold of originality for copyright. schetm (talk) 03:54, 16 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - this is another easy one. This logo image consists only of simple geometric shapes or text. It does not meet the threshold of originality needed for copyright protection, and is therefore in the public domain. Should be re-tagged with Template:PD-logo. SixFourThree (talk) 15:16, 18 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Portlandbeaverscap2008.PNG

Keep - the Minor League Baseball infobox specifically has an entry for current cap logos. The discussion should begin with whether that is optimal, rather than indiscriminately tagging every single individual logo. SixFourThree (talk) 15:17, 18 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:BaltimoreEliteGiantsCapLogo.PNG

Keep as the logo in question doesn't pass the threshold of originality for copyright. schetm (talk) 03:58, 16 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep for that reason. This logo image consists only of simple geometric shapes or text. It does not meet the threshold of originality needed for copyright protection, and is therefore in the public domain. Should be re-tagged with Template:PD-logo. SixFourThree (talk) 15:02, 18 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:CalgaryCannonsCapLogo.PNG

Keep - the Minor League Baseball infobox specifically has an entry for current cap logos. The discussion should begin with whether that is optimal, rather than indiscriminately tagging every single individual logo. SixFourThree (talk) 15:17, 18 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Black Bears cap.png

Keep as the logo in question doesn't pass the threshold of originality for copyright. schetm (talk) 03:58, 16 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Disagree with Schetm. This one is too complex for PD-simple. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 04:34, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - I agree with Schetm, it is not complex enough to pass the threshold. If logos like the Mets' don't, I don't think this this one does. Besides, the Minor League Baseball infobox specifically has an entry for current cap logos. The discussion should begin with whether that is optimal, rather than indiscriminately tagging every single individual logo. SixFourThree (talk) 15:19, 18 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:TorontoMapleLeafs caplogo.svg

Keep - the Minor League Baseball infobox specifically has an entry for current cap logos. The discussion should begin with whether that is optimal, rather than indiscriminately tagging every single individual logo. SixFourThree (talk) 15:20, 18 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:TucsonTorosCapLogo.PNG

Keep - the Minor League Baseball infobox specifically has an entry for cap logos. The discussion should begin with whether that is optimal, rather than indiscriminately tagging every single individual logo. SixFourThree (talk) 15:27, 18 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Birmingham Black Barons cap logo.png

Keep - you have got to be kidding me. Does Jonteemil really think this is eligible for copyright? schetm (talk) 04:00, 16 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Agreed - Keep. This is crazy. SixFourThree (talk) 14:57, 18 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:RichmondBravesCap.png

Keep as the logo in question doesn't pass the threshold of originality for copyright. schetm (talk) 04:00, 16 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep for that reason, and that the Minor League Baseball infobox specifically has an entry for cap logos. The discussion should begin with whether that is optimal, rather than indiscriminately tagging every single individual logo. SixFourThree (talk) 15:28, 18 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:SanFranciscoSeals CapLogo.svg

Keep as the logo in question doesn't pass the threshold of originality for copyright. schetm (talk) 04:01, 16 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep for that reason. This logo image consists only of simple geometric shapes or text. It does not meet the threshold of originality needed for copyright protection, and is therefore in the public domain. Should be re-tagged with Template:PD-logo. SixFourThree (talk) 14:58, 18 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Seattle rainiers caplogo.svg

Keep as the logo in question doesn't pass the threshold of originality for copyright. schetm (talk) 04:01, 16 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep for that reason. This logo image consists only of simple geometric shapes or text. It does not meet the threshold of originality needed for copyright protection, and is therefore in the public domain. Should be re-tagged with Template:PD-logo. SixFourThree (talk) 14:59, 18 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:JamestownJammersCapLogo.PNG

Keep - the Minor League Baseball infobox specifically has an entry for one cap logo. The discussion should begin with whether that is optimal, rather than indiscriminately tagging every single individual logo. SixFourThree (talk) 15:28, 18 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Columbus Blue Birds.jpg

Keep as the image in question doesn't pass the threshold of originality for copyright. schetm (talk) 04:02, 16 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep agreed. SixFourThree (talk) 15:29, 18 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:OaklandOaks(PCL)CapLogo.PNG

Keep as the logo in question doesn't pass the threshold of originality for copyright. schetm (talk) 04:02, 16 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep for that reason. This logo image consists only of simple geometric shapes or text. It does not meet the threshold of originality needed for copyright protection, and is therefore in the public domain. Should be re-tagged with Template:PD-logo. SixFourThree (talk) 15:30, 18 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:NewOrleansPelicansCapLogo.PNG

Keep - the Minor League Baseball infobox specifically has an entry for one cap logo. The discussion should begin with whether that is optimal, rather than indiscriminately tagging every single individual logo. SixFourThree (talk) 15:30, 18 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:HollywoodStarsCap.png

Keep - is the nominator even trying? This logo is a red letter H on a blue background - it most certainly does not pass the threshold of originality for copyright. schetm (talk) 04:03, 16 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep This is getting ridiculous. This logo image consists only of simple geometric shapes or text. It does not meet the threshold of originality needed for copyright protection, and is therefore in the public domain. Should be re-tagged with Template:PD-logo. SixFourThree (talk) 15:00, 18 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:El Paso Diablos.PNG

Keep because looking at the page, this logo is used as the primary means of visual identification. SixFourThree (talk)SixFourThree

File:SacramentoSolons caplogo.svg

Keep as the logo in question doesn't pass the threshold of originality for copyright. schetm (talk) 04:04, 16 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep for that reason. This logo image consists only of simple geometric shapes or text. It does not meet the threshold of originality needed for copyright protection, and is therefore in the public domain. Should be re-tagged with Template:PD-logo. SixFourThree (talk) 15:00, 18 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:OttawaLynxCap.png

Keep - the Minor League Baseball infobox specifically has an entry for one cap logo. The discussion should begin with whether that is optimal, rather than indiscriminately tagging every single individual logo. SixFourThree (talk) 15:32, 18 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Red Roses cap.PNG

Keep as the logo in question doesn't pass the threshold of originality for copyright. schetm (talk) 04:04, 16 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep for that reason. This logo image consists only of simple geometric shapes or text. It does not meet the threshold of originality needed for copyright protection, and is therefore in the public domain. Should be re-tagged with Template:PD-logo. SixFourThree (talk) 15:01, 18 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:LouisvilleColonelsCapLogo.PNG

Keep as the logo in question doesn't pass the threshold of originality for copyright. schetm (talk) 04:04, 16 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep for that reason. This logo image consists only of simple geometric shapes or text. It does not meet the threshold of originality needed for copyright protection, and is therefore in the public domain. Should be re-tagged with Template:PD-logo. SixFourThree (talk) 15:33, 18 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:SultanesCap.png

Keep - the Baseball team infobox specifically has an entry for one cap logo. The discussion should begin with whether that is optimal, rather than indiscriminately tagging every single individual logo. SixFourThree (talk) 15:34, 18 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:EdmontonTrappersCapLogo.PNG

Keep - the Minor League Baseball infobox specifically has an entry for one cap logo. The discussion should begin with whether that is appropriate, rather than indiscriminately tagging every single individual logo. SixFourThree (talk) 15:35, 18 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Wasco Reserves cap.png

Keep - the independent baseball team infobox specifically has an entry for one cap logo. The discussion should begin with whether that is appropriate, rather than indiscriminately tagging every single individual logo. SixFourThree (talk) 15:38, 18 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:CT Defenders cap.PNG

Keep - the Minor League Baseball infobox specifically has an entry for one cap logo as the primary means of visual identification. The discussion should begin with whether that is appropriate, rather than indiscriminately tagging every single individual logo. SixFourThree (talk) 15:38, 18 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Milwaukeebears.png

Keep as the logo in question doesn't pass the threshold of originality for copyright. schetm (talk) 04:05, 16 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, for that reason. Should have used Template:PD-logo; This logo image consists only of simple geometric shapes or text. It does not meet the threshold of originality needed for copyright protection, and is therefore in the public domain.. SixFourThree (talk) 14:55, 18 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Monterey Amberjacks cap.PNG

Keep - the independent baseball team infobox specifically has an entry for one cap logo as a primary means of visual identification. The discussion should begin with whether that is appropriate, rather than indiscriminately tagging every single individual logo. SixFourThree (talk) 15:47, 18 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:TulsaOilers(baseball)CapLogo.PNG

Keep as the logo in question doesn't pass the threshold of originality for copyright. schetm (talk) 04:05, 16 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep for that reason. This logo image consists only of simple geometric shapes or text. It does not meet the threshold of originality needed for copyright protection, and is therefore in the public domain. Should be re-tagged with Template:PD-logo. SixFourThree (talk) 15:48, 18 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:PhoenixFirebirdsCapLogo.PNG

Keep - the Minor League Baseball infobox specifically has an entry for current cap logos as a primary means of visual identification. The discussion should begin with whether that is optimal, rather than indiscriminately tagging every single individual logo. SixFourThree (talk) 15:48, 18 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Tijuana Toros cap insignia.png

Keep as the logo in question doesn't pass the threshold of originality for copyright. schetm (talk) 04:05, 16 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Disagree with Schetm. This one is too complex for PD-simple. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 04:35, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep I agree with Schetm. This logo image consists only of simple geometric shapes or text. It does not meet the threshold of originality needed for copyright protection, and is therefore in the public domain. Should be re-tagged with Template:PD-logo. SixFourThree (talk) 15:49, 18 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:YakimaBearsCapLogo2008.PNG

Keep - the Minor League Baseball infobox specifically has an entry for current cap logos as a primary means of visual identification. The discussion should begin with whether that is appropriate, rather than indiscriminately tagging every single individual logo. SixFourThree (talk) 15:49, 18 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:New Olmecas de Tabasco cap logo.jpg

Keep as the logo in question doesn't pass the threshold of originality for copyright. schetm (talk) 04:06, 16 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep for that reason. Should be re-tagged with Template:PD-logo. SixFourThree (talk) 15:50, 18 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Tampa smokers cap.jpg

oppose This is a single letter T and clearly a wordmark! Did anybody actually look at all these logos before listing them or does Wikipolicy go by the wayside when one is enjoying a lovely evening of mass deletion nominations? Zeng8r (talk) 00:15, 15 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I agree, it's PD-textlogo. File page had been updated.Jonteemil (talk) 05:41, 15 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep as the logo in question doesn't pass the threshold of originality for copyright. schetm (talk) 04:07, 16 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:MichiganBattleCats.gif

Keep - the Minor League Baseball infobox specifically has an entry for current cap logos as a primary means of visual identification. The discussion should begin with whether that is appropriate, rather than indiscriminately tagging every single individual logo. SixFourThree (talk) 15:51, 18 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:TucsonPadresCap.PNG

Keep - the Minor League Baseball infobox specifically has an entry for current cap logos as a primary means of visual identification. The discussion should begin with whether that is appropriate, rather than indiscriminately tagging every single individual logo. SixFourThree (talk) 15:52, 18 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:EvansvilleTripletsCaoLogo.PNG

Keep as the logo in question doesn't pass the threshold of originality for copyright. schetm (talk) 04:07, 16 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Disagree with Schetm. This one is too complex for PD-simple. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 04:35, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Agreed with Schetm. This logo does not meet the threshold of originality needed for copyright protection, and is therefore in the public domain. Should be re-tagged with Template:PD-logo. SixFourThree (talk) 15:52, 18 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Logo devilrays.gif

Keep - the Minor League Baseball infobox specifically has an entry for current cap logos as a primary means of visual identification. The discussion should begin with whether that is appropriate, rather than indiscriminately tagging every single individual logo. SixFourThree (talk) 15:53, 18 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Southern Oregon Timberjacks Cap Insignia 1.png

Keep - the Minor League Baseball infobox specifically has an entry for current cap logos as a primary means of visual identification. The discussion should begin with whether that is appropriate, rather than indiscriminately tagging every single individual logo. SixFourThree (talk) 15:53, 18 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:2016 Tucson Saguaros Cap.jpg

Agree with this one. The graphic is not solely the cap logo, and as such does not belong in the Infobox, so it falls outside of established use policy. SixFourThree (talk) 15:55, 18 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:BCYankees.gif

Keep - the Minor League Baseball infobox specifically has an entry for current cap logos as a primary means of visual identification. The discussion should begin with whether that is appropriate, rather than indiscriminately tagging every single individual logo. SixFourThree (talk) 15:56, 18 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:PortlandRockies caplogo.jpg

Keep - the Minor League Baseball infobox specifically has an entry for current cap logos as a primary means of visual identification. The discussion should begin with whether that is appropriate, rather than indiscriminately tagging every single individual logo. SixFourThree (talk) 15:56, 18 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Madison hatters.jpg

Keep. According to WP:NFC, "The NFCI#2 allowance for logos only applies to the use of the logo on the infobox or lede for the stand-alone article about the entity, and should reflect its most current logo." This logo is used in the infobox of the stand-alone article about the team. The team only existed for one year, 1994, so I am fairly sure it is the most current logo. It thus appears to meet the guideline. BRMo (talk) 04:29, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Per NFCC 3a - There's no reason for both non-free logos, and this is the secondary one. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 04:36, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - the Minor League Baseball infobox specifically has an entry for one cap logo as a primary means of visual identification. The discussion should begin with whether that is appropriate, rather than indiscriminately tagging every single individual logo. SixFourThree (talk) 15:56, 18 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Williamsport Bills cap.JPG

Keep as the logo in question doesn't pass the threshold of originality for copyright. schetm (talk) 04:08, 16 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep for that reason. This logo image does not meet the threshold of originality needed for copyright protection, and is therefore in the public domain. Should be re-tagged with Template:PD-logo. SixFourThree (talk) 15:57, 18 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:CatfishCap.PNG

Keep - the Minor League Baseball infobox specifically has an entry for one cap logo as a primary means of visual identification. The discussion should begin with whether that is appropriate, rather than indiscriminately tagging every single individual logo. SixFourThree (talk) 15:58, 18 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Njcardinalscap.gif

Keep - the Minor League Baseball infobox specifically has an entry for one cap logo as a primary means of visual identification. The discussion should begin with whether that is appropriate, rather than indiscriminately tagging every single individual logo. SixFourThree (talk) 15:58, 18 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:CAK Indians cap.PNG

I think the logo is offensive, but still Keep - the Minor League Baseball infobox specifically has an entry for one cap logo as a primary means of visual identification. The discussion should begin with whether that is appropriate, rather than indiscriminately tagging every single individual logo. SixFourThree (talk) 15:59, 18 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:EauClaireBears caplogo.svg

Keep as the logo in question doesn't pass the threshold of originality for copyright. schetm (talk) 04:08, 16 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Agreed - Keep. It was improperly categorized when uploaded. This logo image consists only of simple geometric shapes or text. It does not meet the threshold of originality needed for copyright protection, and is therefore in the public domain. Should have used Template:PD-textlogo. SixFourThree (talk) 14:50, 18 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:FayettevilleGenerals.jpg

Keep as the logo in question doesn't pass the threshold of originality for copyright. schetm (talk) 04:09, 16 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep for that reason. This logo image consists only of simple geometric shapes or text. It does not meet the threshold of originality needed for copyright protection, and is therefore in the public domain. Should be re-tagged with Template:PD-logo. SixFourThree (talk) 15:59, 18 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Vermont Reds cap.PNG

Keep as the logo in question doesn't pass the threshold of originality for copyright. schetm (talk) 04:09, 16 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep for that reason. This logo image consists only of simple geometric shapes or text. It does not meet the threshold of originality needed for copyright protection, and is therefore in the public domain. Should be re-tagged with Template:PD-logo. SixFourThree (talk) 16:00, 18 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Cape Fear Crocs hat logo.JPG

Keep - the Minor League Baseball infobox specifically has an entry for one cap logo as a primary means of visual identification. The discussion should begin with whether that is appropriate, rather than indiscriminately tagging every single individual logo. SixFourThree (talk) 16:00, 18 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Wilmington Waves - South Georgia Waves hat logo.png

Keep - the Minor League Baseball infobox specifically has an entry for one cap logo as a primary means of visual identification. The discussion should begin with whether that is appropriate, rather than indiscriminately tagging every single individual logo. SixFourThree (talk) 16:00, 18 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Riverside Pilots hat logo.JPG

Keep as the logo in question doesn't pass the threshold of originality for copyright. schetm (talk) 04:09, 16 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep for that reason. This logo image consists only of simple geometric shapes or text. It does not meet the threshold of originality needed for copyright protection, and is therefore in the public domain. Should be re-tagged with Template:PD-logo. SixFourThree (talk) 16:01, 18 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Albany Polecats hat logo.JPG

Keep - the Minor League Baseball infobox specifically has an entry for one cap logo as a primary means of visual identification. The discussion should begin with whether that is appropriate, rather than indiscriminately tagging every single individual logo. SixFourThree (talk) 16:02, 18 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]