< December 18	December 20 >

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 27 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Post-1989 patent (see c:Template:PD-US-patent-no notice). Magog the Ogre (t • c) 00:08, 19 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 27 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Derivative work. Magog the Ogre (t • c) 00:12, 19 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F8 by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 12:06, 27 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Dubious that this crosses the threshold of originality — thinking it's PD. Simple geometry, solid colors, font not too special. DemonDays64 (talk) 01:44, 19 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed, file is ~~not~~ below of the TOO. P,TO 19104 (talk) (contribs) 17:17, 19 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@P,TO 19104:, do you mean you think it is PD or that it is not? I am saying I think it might be PD and you are saying you agree, then saying the opposite of what I think. Please clarify, thanks DemonDays64 (talk) 20:25, 19 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@DemonDays64: Thank you for clarifying. Yes, I meant that the logo was below the TOO, and in Public Domain. P,TO 19104 (talk) (contribs) 21:27, 19 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete File:White Christmas Holiday Inn sheet music 1942.png, keep File:Decca18429A.jpg. -FASTILY 02:02, 28 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I uploaded a sheet music of White Christmas (song), preferably one of earliest editions, as part of lead infobox. However, I wasn't sure whether to replace the long-standing image of a side label of the 1942 78-RPM shellac record release. With WP:NFCC#3a and WP:NFCC#8, I'm taking both sheet music and side label here instead because... I'm torn between the two images as a more suitable lead image.

Understandably, picture sleeves and any other pictorial visuals have had mass appeal over the years. However, I'm uncertain whether I should use a sheet music's cover art. Both sheet music and 1942 recording of the song were best-sellers, but recordings have had more mass appeal than sheet music. In this case, the recording may have had sold better than the sheet music. Technically and logically, the side label should be the sole lead image because recordings like that one were prominent and because displaying the recording release itself should help readers see how a recording was labelled. Furthermore, I think more customers of that time must have enjoyed hearing Crosby's 1942 recording than using a sheet music to perform the song themselves with any available instrument. Because of sheet musics' waning popularity especially either at the time and/or over the years thereafter, I was too reluctant to replace the side label with a sheet music. However, cover arts of any media (e.g. posters, picture sleeves) have far greater mass appeal over the years, especially to editors, than I can possibly imagine. If the sheet music can please and is more preferable to everyone, then let's go for the sheet music's cover. However, I'll see how this discussion goes... George Ho (talk) 04:00, 19 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Sheet Music Cover since the Decca can adequately illustrate the article (it was also uploaded first). In addition, the sheet music has a strange orientation, as if the picture were taken from a weird angle. P,TO 19104 (talk) (contribs) 21:31, 19 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Update: I found out that there is a Commons copy of the label: File:Bing Crosby - White Christmas 1942 10 inch.jpg, which I nominated for deletion. George Ho (talk) 22:53, 19 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: remove all from Bad (album). Ə XPLICIT 06:20, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The three audio samples are used at not only their own respective song articles (Bad (Michael Jackson song), Dirty Diana, The Way You Make Me Feel) but also the album article Bad (album). Somehow, those files lack rationales for usage in the album article. I could have boldly removed the samples from the album article, but the articles transcluding the samples are Good Articles. I'm listing the samples here instead. WP:NFCC#10c is resolvable in no time, but what matters more is each sample's compliance with WP:NFCC#8, especially when used in more than one article. George Ho (talk) 12:59, 19 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

As I just found out, the FAC nomination was rejected partially because someone had concerns about the audio samples. George Ho (talk) 23:45, 27 December 2020 (UTC); edited, 23:46, 27 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete -FASTILY 00:28, 27 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Unused images of Bushmaster Knock-Offs (there was formerly an article on these guns, however it was deleted). No obvious use given the guns are not notable, thus not useful for any Wikimedia project. All of the files were uploaded by the same user. P,TO 19104 (talk) (contribs) 17:18, 19 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete all, orphaned with no obvious value. Salavat (talk) 07:18, 20 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: JPEG versions deleted per WP:G7 and withdrawing nomination on PNG version. (non-admin closure) George Ho (talk) 03:55, 20 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Obsolete; an image of the same premise was uploaded at the same time, and the other is better. Le Panini ^[🥪] 18:54, 19 December 2020 (UTC); 18:56, 19 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Le Panini:, which image do you want deleted? you nominated both that are used on the page Super Paper Mario. They are both useful because it shows how the game uses the mechanic — they show the same scene changing when the player flips. DemonDays64 (talk) 20:22, 19 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Le Panini: Shall I merge both of your nominations into one? Seems your rationales are the same. George Ho (talk) 20:46, 19 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
George Ho, If that's how it works here, yes. There was another image of the exact same gameplay screenshot uploaded at the same time; I decided to keep the other one. When this is deleted, I'll replace the image. Le Panini ^[🥪] 00:24, 20 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
You mean the PNG version uploaded by different editor? I inserted the PNG version with FFD notice in caption. BTW, merging both listings into one (i.e. changing from this revision). --George Ho (talk) 00:48, 20 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you meant to use the PNG version and then dump JPEG, then... let's go for the png version; i.e. PNG > JPEG. George Ho (talk) 00:51, 20 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
George Ho, Yes, I want to delete the two jpegs and keep the png for the article. I don't know how to delete images, and I assumed this is where I needed to go. Le Panini ^[🥪] 02:45, 20 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
If you can use ((db-g7)) on your jpeg versions, and they get deleted, then I'll withdraw my listing on the PNG version. Would that do? George Ho (talk) 02:46, 20 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete -FASTILY 00:28, 27 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

There is no critical commentary on this particular image and it is not used to increase understanding of the subject. Fails NFCC#8. Hummerrocket (talk) 18:58, 19 December 2020 (UTC); 19:03, 19 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Hummerrocket: Shall I merge most (if not all) of your nominations into one? Seems your rationales are the same. Furthermore, I fear that votes will be the same for your every nomination. George Ho (talk) 20:48, 19 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@George Ho: Yes, I'd appreciate if you could do that. Thanks! Hummerrocket (talk) 20:50, 19 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

All merged (i.e. changed from this revision). For mass nomination, there are instructions at WP:FFD#Instructions for listing files for discussion. Twinkle is not suitable for mass-noms, unfortunately, so you may want to manually use ((subst:ffd2a)) instead. George Ho (talk) 21:01, 19 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete all it is not clear what is going on in those scenes. Also, I doubt their super famous. The pictures would not be super important to have in those articles. P,TO 19104 (talk) (contribs) 21:34, 19 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I think that almost all of the images on the Sopranos episode articles fail the NFCC#8 criteria, so we should look into deleting those as well. Hummerrocket (talk) 16:05, 20 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

December 19

File:US2007025832 CargoContainer Figure21.png

File:Bobbycapo.jpg

File:Georgia USA logo.jpg

Lead images of White Christmas (song)

Samples of Bad (album)

Bkogallery Images

Super Paper Mario screenshots

Sopranos screenshots