The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: relisted on 2020 February 22. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 08:25, 22 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Defective Person ;-).jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 06:43, 19 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:AnalGestapo2019.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Rockunion (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

promotional image of some sort, dubious self-work claim FASTILY 06:14, 12 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - It's promotional image for a band. Claim of being the copyright holder is highly dubious. The EXIF indicates it has been copied from Facebook. See Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anal Gestapo. -- Whpq (talk) 15:33, 12 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep - This was contributed by the owner of the image who also maintains the band's Facebook page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 93.86.237.226 (talk) 07:48, 16 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 09:05, 20 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:C. Oliver LaGrone working on a sculpture, 1942. Courtesy Cranbrook Archive neg. 1997-01 Env1 5873-2.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Cordell Affeldt (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

This image is uploaded as no-free but also includes a claim that the image has been licensed as CC BY-SA 4.0. It can be one or the other but not both.

The uploader has stated that they have paid a fee to license this image stating "My payment for one-time Wikipedia use covers a CC BY-SA 4.0 license." This statement contradicts a CC-BY-SA 4.0 license in that a free license cannot restrict this to a one time use on Wikipedia. The same image has been uploaded to Commons as c:File:5873-2 web from Cranbrook for Wikipedia only.jpg with OTRS pending. If the image is confirmed to be CC-BY-SA 4.0, then there is no need for this file here on the English Wikipedia.

Addressing this image a non-free work, the stated purpose is "...illustrates Oliver LaGrone as an active student of sculpture at Cranbrook, as set forth in the text of the wiki on LaGrone." However, text alone provides the information that LaGrone was there. As such it fails WP:NFCC#1, and with no significant sourced commentary about the image, also fails WP:NFCC#8. Note that we do have a free image of the subject in the article (File:Artist Oliver LaGrone with mallet and "Mercy" model, from- Archives of American Art - Oliver LaGrone - 2214 (cropped).jpg), so the fact that the subject is deceased would not be a reason for including this image as non-free.

Regardless of how the license issue resolves, we end up with deleting this image on the English Wikipedia. Whpq (talk) 16:52, 12 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.