The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Not a matter for FfD. -FASTILY 00:55, 17 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Madison Square Garden logo.svg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by RandyFitz (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Listing non-SVG logo for discussion. Just because the logo has a SVG extension that does not make it a SVG logo. The logo's uploader argues otherwise. However, the logo is pixelated and is just a PNG version saved as a SVG logo. – Sabbatino (talk) 07:47, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment What is your proposed action? Right now this can (and should) be tagged with ((di-orphaned fair use)). Wikiacc (¶) 21:25, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Also, it is worth distinguishing between SVG the XML-based language, which this file is, and vector graphic, which this file is not. Wikiacc (¶) 21:33, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    • My intent was that it is not a vector graphic, which it should be and the logo was in very poor quality (when zoomed it would not adapt and become pixelated like a PNG/JPG/etc. file). The uploader has fixed the file to some extent (there are still many artifacts). And I opened the discussion here since I assumed that once ((di-orphaned fair use)) is removed then the next step is to take it here (similar to PROD and AFD). – Sabbatino (talk) 09:45, 10 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
      • It's not quite like PROD: one can't just remove the tag if the conditions still apply. I see a bot has gone ahead and re-added the tag. Wikiacc (¶) 21:43, 11 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:02, 17 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:IDD 2016 copyrightSII wiki.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Mobyjaws56 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

I don't see how this can be his own work - Shark Island Institute owned image of Executive Director Ian Darling. Photographed as host of Good Pitch in 2016. - likely taken from Shark Island Institute Gbawden (talk) 07:49, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete unless SII sends permission to OTRS. Wikiacc (¶) 22:13, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F8 by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT⚡ 02:02, 17 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:螢幕擷取畫面 (35).png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Makhkugeo (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

It looks like the older version of the file is taken from https://science.sciencemag.org/content/323/5910/49/tab-pdf which doesn't show a free licence. The more recent version might be a derivative work too. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 11:14, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Relicense to ((PD-simple)). Both versions are derivative works (not exact copies of the figure from the paper, but clearly closely modeled on it) but this diagram seems too simple to be copyrighted. Wikiacc (¶) 21:52, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Reverted inappropriate removal -FASTILY 00:55, 17 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:XTC Go 2.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Jiy (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Two years ago I closed a discussion Wikipedia:Files_for_discussion/2018_November_26#File:XTC_Go_2.jpg which established that this file is probably nonfree, but a year ago Game4brains unilaterally overrode that decision. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 11:28, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Non-free per earlier discussion. Wikiacc (¶) 21:20, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Resolved. -FASTILY 00:55, 17 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Xanthi football club.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Creative2016 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

There is no evidence in the source that the file is freely licenced, and it should probably be dealt with like a non-free logo. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 11:30, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

It is publicly available for download from the club's website.However, fair use licence can be suitable! Gnslps (talk) 09:03, 10 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. GiantSnowman 10:49, 10 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Relicensed to non-free logo and added a fair use. Salavat (talk) 07:06, 13 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:02, 17 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:YES I CAN group shot with branding.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Liisa91 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

The older versions of this file look very much like films or posters, and the title of the file also endorses the notion that this image was derived from a TV series. I am not so sure about the most recent version, though. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 11:32, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:02, 17 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Aeromexico chatbot on Facebook Messenger.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Keizers (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

This image is certainly replaceable with a free resource. The chatbot article already has a few examples, there is no reason why a Facebook bot is so different as to warrant applying the fair-use doctrine. Ysangkok (talk) 18:41, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:02, 17 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Pressphoto.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Smopo (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

I don't think the previous FFD was handled correctly. This file was uploaded on top of an existing, unrelated file, and the description was not changed. Therefore the uploader did not explicitly make a claim of own work – the tag is left over from the old file. Given the name ("press photo") and the seemingly professional quality of the photo, I doubt that the uploader is actually the copyright holder. Wikiacc (¶) 21:16, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.