The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:03, 29 December 2021 (UTC)
Unused, blurry/low-quality, no obvious encyclopedic use FASTILY 03:27, 20 December 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:03, 28 December 2021 (UTC)
Photos of jumbrotrons are unacceptable derivative works. ✗plicit 07:02, 20 December 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:03, 28 December 2021 (UTC)
I'm not exactly sure what this image is for. Ixfd64 (talk) 07:50, 20 December 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:03, 28 December 2021 (UTC)
Photo is credited to a Matt Wright, but uploader stated at Talk:The Silent Film that his name is Jonathan. We need evidence that the photographer has given the rights to the uploader. Image is not currently in use. Ixfd64 (talk) 07:55, 20 December 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:03, 28 December 2021 (UTC)
UK freedom of panorama does not apply to 2D artworks. Image is not used anywhere. Ixfd64 (talk) 07:57, 20 December 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Withdrawn. (non-admin closure) --George Ho (talk) 11:18, 20 December 2021 (UTC)
The previous FFD nomination closed as "no consensus". Two editors favor keeping the sample in the song article (Anarchy in the U.K.). One of them didn't specify which articles, while the other said that the song article should be the only article to use the sample. The uploader wanted the sample kept in that article and two other articles (punk rock and Sex Pistols).
Before then, I wasn't sure about the sample's compliance with NFCC. Now as I figure, the song article has sufficient critical commentary to support the sample. The sample has similar captions in the both song and genre articles, yet I don't see the genre article sufficiently supporting the sample especially outside the caption. Also, I don't see enough commentary in the band article supporting the sample. In other words, the sample may remain in the song article but must be removed from other articles. George Ho (talk) 10:48, 20 December 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: keep. ✗plicit 13:51, 4 March 2022 (UTC)
A static image is preferred to an animation per WP:IUP#ANIM, especially when the file in question is non-free content. Using a single frame from the file would be sufficient to illustrate the gameplay rather than using an animation with 55 non-free image frames (WP:NFCC#3). Wcam (talk) 16:17, 20 December 2021 (UTC)
The team created a digital library of animated expressions for Kena, allowing for refinement and consistency in the character.Unless I'm missing something, I don't see any other passage adequately supporting what the clip demonstrates. --George Ho (talk) 01:58, 22 December 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: relisted on 2022 January 18. MBisanz talk 01:32, 18 January 2022 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:03, 28 December 2021 (UTC)
Typically, original cover arts have been used. Reissue ones aren't typically used. No exception is Lovers (Babyface album), which uses the original cover art instead of the reissue one. The 2020 reissue artwork of Aquarius (Tinashe album) is no exception either. The article either barely mentions or doesn't mention the reissue release in context. To me, the 2020 reissue artwork is used to differentiate from the original by mere appearance; it may fail WP:NFCC#3a and WP:NFCC#8. George Ho (talk) 19:44, 20 December 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Moot/not actionable. File was removed from all articles except Hey Jealousy -FASTILY 01:21, 24 February 2022 (UTC)
The sample may comply with WP:NFCC#8 and may remain in Hey Jealousy. I could be wrong about critical commentary being sufficient enough to support the sample. However, the same cannot be said about its appearance in Doug Hopkins and Gin Blossoms. IMO the sample must be removed from the band article and the musician one. George Ho (talk) 23:56, 20 December 2021 (UTC)
As said before, I could be wrong about the sample as acceptable fair-use content to use especially in the song article. No objections to deleting it completely from the project. --George Ho (talk) 17:36, 25 December 2021 (UTC)