The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 05:04, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
Unused personal photo. Out of scope --Minorax«¦talk¦» 00:40, 22 January 2022 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 05:04, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
SVG on commons as c:File:Fl mammals cr.svg --Minorax«¦talk¦» 00:52, 22 January 2022 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 05:04, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
SVG on commons as c:File:Fl mammals ex.svg --Minorax«¦talk¦» 00:53, 22 January 2022 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 05:04, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
SVG on commons as c:File:Fl mammals nd.svg --Minorax«¦talk¦» 00:53, 22 January 2022 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 05:04, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
SVG on commons as c:File:Fl mammals dd.svg --Minorax«¦talk¦» 00:53, 22 January 2022 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 05:04, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
SVG on commons as c:File:Fl mammals ew.svg --Minorax«¦talk¦» 00:53, 22 January 2022 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 05:04, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
SVG on commons as c:File:Fl mammals en.svg --Minorax«¦talk¦» 00:54, 22 January 2022 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 05:04, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
SVG on commons as c:File:Fl mammals vu.svg --Minorax«¦talk¦» 00:54, 22 January 2022 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 05:04, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
SVG on commons as c:File:Fl mammals nt.svg --Minorax«¦talk¦» 00:54, 22 January 2022 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 05:04, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
SVG on commons as c:File:Fl mammals lc.svg --Minorax«¦talk¦» 00:54, 22 January 2022 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
Orphaned, low quality, unfocused. No foreseeable encyclopedic use. ✗plicit 01:29, 22 January 2022 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 14:10, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
2 problems with this file. Incorrect colours & weird red line at the right. Usage swapped with commons file --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:15, 22 January 2022 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT⚡ 14:10, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
For NBC we use File:NBC logo (2013).svg which is non-free so this file is unused. Transferring to Commons seems like a poor idea, see c:Commons:Deletion requests/Three NBC logos and c:Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:NBC logos. — Alexis Jazz (talk or ping me) 06:46, 22 January 2022 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 14:10, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
Superseded and replaced by File:Downtown by Petula Clark UK vinyl A-side solid centre.png. If not for substantial changes by others previously, woulda been eligible for WP:G7. George Ho (talk) 09:12, 22 January 2022 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: relisted on 2022 January 29. ✗plicit 12:56, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:01, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
Unused book cover, no evidence uploader is the copyright holder. Ixfd64 (talk) 19:08, 22 January 2022 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:01, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
Unused; superseded by File:Tve2-logo2.png. – Pbrks (t • c) 20:04, 22 January 2022 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete File:Take On Me cover.jpg -FASTILY 00:56, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
One of the cover arts was removed from the song article, citing WP:NFCC#3a. I thought the matter should have been discussed rather than done by bold removal. The first release (discogs) was a hit Norway (the band's home country) but wasn't successful elsewhere. The third release (discogs) reflects the song's international success... or was it the second? Anyways, if one cover art is enough, then let's go for a cover art that is more successful. Otherwise, how about doing the same way as I Should Be So Lucky cover arts (FFD discussion)? George Ho (talk) 21:12, 22 January 2022 (UTC)
Or, if there's no consensus on either cover art, and if using more than one cover art is still against policy, we may by default go for the cover art of the first release then. Right? George Ho (talk) 00:04, 29 January 2022 (UTC); expanded, 00:05, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
The cover art of the re-release of Madonna's eponymous debut album, titled The First Album was discussed previously (2012, 2013). Then it was removed without further discussion, saying: it does not seem to be drastically different from the original, nor is it critically discussed unlike the original version. Even the remastered editions all used the original version only which is by default more popular.
Then the same album reissue cover (in JPEG format) was removed as insignificant to the original cover and failing WP:NFCC#3a
. I thought the reissue cover art should've been listed at FFD when it was removed (and/or re-removed). Now here I am listing the reissue cover here. Either the reissue cover should be kept (in the same way as ...Baby One More Time (album)), or... just re-delete it. George Ho (talk) 21:34, 22 January 2022 (UTC)