The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: keep the reissue cover, delete the original. ✗plicit 13:34, 30 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Radiohead original creep cover.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by JD554 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

File:Creep by radiohead reissue.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Tamer Gunner (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

If using more than one cover art is against WP:NFCC#3a and/or WP:NFCC#8, then let's choose either one. Preferably, the 1993 EP reissue—with yellow background and closeup view of a portion from the original release—should be used. The song "Creep" fared better on the British music chart one year after its initial unsuccessful British release. In other words, the first release—with white background and entire artwork—should go. Someone else objected the PROD tag on the first release just because it's... the "first release". Not all songs were successful in their original, initial releases. Take Should I Stay or Should I Go and I Will Remember You (Sarah McLachlan song), for example. George Ho (talk) 01:37, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete original. I agree that we only need one piece of cover art for this, and that choosing the better known version makes sense. Popcornfud (talk) 11:52, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete original and French covers. Since the 1993 re-release is the best-known version, we should delete the original. Meanwhile, the song did not become popular in France until a re-release in late 1995/early 1996 (the image used is the 1993 artwork), so that cover should go too. ResPM (T🔈🎵C) 13:10, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

What kind of twatty rule is that? Why would an encyclopedia have a rule against being as comprehensive as possible? What's wrong with you people? 86.154.102.52 (talk) 20:05, 27 January 2022 (UTC) tildey tildey tilde.[reply]

Because of international copyright law. Popcornfud (talk) 16:14, 29 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 15:09, 30 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Nakajima Unknown Pusher Fighter.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Imp dean (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

allegedly published in 1945, which means ((PD-US)) cannot apply. Assuming the author is actually unknown (and presumed country of origin = Japan), this won't be free until 1945+95 = 2040 FASTILY 03:06, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Orphaned, dubious licensing. HouseBlaster^talk 22:06, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete, orphaned with questionable licensing. Salavat (talk) 00:18, 24 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 15:09, 30 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Thomas K. Moore Arlington NC grave site details.pdf (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Bcrford (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

orphaned, unusable/esoteric format (pdf), no obvious encyclopedic use, see also: c:Commons:Deletion requests/File:Thomas K. Moore Arlington NC grave site details.pdf FASTILY 03:12, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Per nom, without prejudice against an image of the gravestone in a usable format being uploaded in the event it is needed for encyclopedic purposes. HouseBlaster^talk 22:06, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete, orphaned with no obvious value. Salavat (talk) 00:18, 24 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 15:09, 30 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Flag of Augsburg.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Ninja of Tao (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Seems to be a wrong representation of the actual flag. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 03:22, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete, orphaned with no obvious value. Salavat (talk) 00:19, 24 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 15:09, 30 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Flag of Government of Macau.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Dn9ahx (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Seems to be of incorrect colours as per online source. Redundant to c:File:Flag of the Government of Portuguese Macau (1976–1999).svg --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 04:43, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete, redundant to Commons file. Salavat (talk) 00:19, 24 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 15:09, 30 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Free Blue Star.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by 2012Olympian (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Redundant to c:File:Blue star.svg. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 05:34, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete, redundant to Commons file. Salavat (talk) 00:20, 24 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 15:09, 30 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Bowie BoysKeepSwinging.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Tom Prankerd (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Superseded and replaced by File:Boys Keep Swinging cw Fantastic Voyage by David Bowie UK single.png, which I uploaded. George Ho (talk) 05:58, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 15:09, 30 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Harinder-Singh-Giani.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Harpreetgiani (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Clearly cropped & edited from somewhere. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 07:08, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete, orphaned with questionable licensing. Salavat (talk) 00:21, 24 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Missing verifiable source. No prejudice to restoration if someone can produce both a citation/source and a valid fair use claim for the image -FASTILY 03:13, 31 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Babalola.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Isaiah4real (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Low res file. Uploader claims image was snapped on 09/09/2012 but Babalola died in 1959. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 08:41, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Relicense to non-free biog pic and add a fair use. The lack of a source might be a problem though. Salavat (talk) 00:23, 24 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Missing verifiable source. No prejudice to restoration if someone can produce both a citation/source and a valid fair use claim for the image -FASTILY 03:13, 31 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Binyamin Rizvi.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Crown Prince (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Edited file. Source for original image needed. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 09:04, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Relicense to non-free biog pic and add a fair use. Lack of a source might be a problem though. Salavat (talk) 00:24, 24 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 15:09, 30 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Diana Ross - I'm Coming Out single cover.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by SnapSnap (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Years ago, I previously discussed which lead image(s) to keep; that ended in "no consensus". I just now uploaded a side label of the US single release without replacing either sleeve, but that amounted to three infobox images. One of the images should be scrapped if using three is against WP:NFCC#3a. The German sleeve (ebay, 45cat, discogs) may have be uploaded to the project earlier than the French one (45cat, discogs). However, I prefer keeping the French and the US releases (for now) and abandon the German one. George Ho (talk) 10:12, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concur with retaining French release as lead image. - JGabbard (talk) 01:40, 24 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 05:03, 31 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:LaasqorayNET Logo.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Abdirisak (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Unused not-fully-free logo. Parent article was AFD'd. Ixfd64 (talk) 18:47, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Setting aside any licensing issues, it is an orphaned image that cannot be moved to the Commons nor used in a notable article. HouseBlaster^talk 22:06, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete, orphaned with no obvious value. Salavat (talk) 00:25, 24 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 05:03, 31 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Lid.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Jbach2k (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Unused image of copyrighted packaging. Ixfd64 (talk) 18:51, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. No evidence that the uploader is actually the copyright holder. Orphaned, so it would fail WP:NFCC#7. HouseBlaster^talk 22:06, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete, orphaned with questionable licensing. Salavat (talk) 00:25, 24 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 05:03, 31 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Updologo.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by 718 Bot (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Claims to be the logo of Parochial Union of Ordino, but the source is "Own work". No reference to determine whether or not Parochial Union of Ordino indeed used this text as their logo. – Pbrks ^(t • c) 19:21, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 05:03, 31 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:English-slf2.PNG (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by LiquidFire (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Delete. Unused/orphaned raster image that does not appear to have been used as a source to create a vector image that contains the same information. In other words, it is not needed for attribution purposes. HouseBlaster^talk 21:42, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete, redundant to Commons file. Salavat (talk) 00:26, 24 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.