The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: no consensus. Whpq (talk) 13:37, 14 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Dark Side of the Moon.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Dream out loud (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

The (iconic) album cover of The Dark Side of the Moon may be still copyrighted in the United Kingdom and ineligible for transfer to Commons (per DR discussion), but something intrigued me, especially from the previous FFD nomination. The album cover was published in the US without copyright notice, and the US and UK releases were simultaneous. Even URAA doesn't recover US copyright of foreign works that were released in the US within 30 days after first publication (elsewhere/overseas). If everything is fully true, then the album cover should be tagged as ((PD-USonly)) rather than non-free. George Ho (talk) 18:37, 28 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Whpq (talk) 11:15, 6 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: no consensus. No consensus on copyright status. Whpq (talk) 13:37, 14 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:John Martin Scripps forge Darin Damude signature.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by WorldTravleerAndPhotoTaker (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

I can't make up my mind on the signatures made in this photo. Typical signatures themselves are ineligible for US copyright (per c:COM:SIG US) but are still copyrighted in the UK (per c:COM:SIG UK). Also, the background of the photo is not complex enough for copyright: it's just some document resembling a line (notebook) paper or something like that. However, the signatures made by the late British criminal John Martin Scripps are forgeries, yet I don't see how such forged signatures are artistic enough for copyright protection.

This image is ineligible for transfer to Commons per UK laws, but we can determine whether this image is either free in the US or absolutely non-free. If free, then tag it with ((PD-ineligible-USonly)). If non-free, then we must determine whether it's contextually significant to this person in question. If it fails the criterion, then the image must be deleted. George Ho (talk) 18:48, 28 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

i think its contextually significant to this person in question, as the trial judge highlighted it as the reason for dismissing John Martin Scripps claim of being in a daze after the murders, as he was clear headed enough to practice forging signatures in a clear style of writing (and gluing his photo into their passports too). Regarding copyright, it could be argued that it is the forgery of someone else's signature, therefore it is infact no ones signature (doesnt belong to the writer or the person he is imitating) WorldTravleerAndPhotoTaker (talk) 07:27, 29 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Whpq (talk) 11:16, 6 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete yet another unnecessary unfree file from WTAPT. Reading too much into this. Dronebogus (talk) 09:58, 7 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: relisted on 2023 July 14. Whpq (talk) 13:38, 14 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Saint Michaels Cathedral (Kiev) in ruins.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.