The result of the discussion was: Speedy delete - G4 Happy‑melon 13:46, 1 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 06:38, 12 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Kept, PD tag removed, renominated NRD. After Midnight 0001 18:07, 13 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The logo is owned by Capital Crime Writers fully. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Katherinehobbs (talk • contribs) 05:50, 26 February 2010 (UTC) The logo has been in use by the CCW circa 1989 -- The designer is unknown. We attempted to verify who had designed it two years ago by researching through the historical files of the organization and asking the founding members, and other long term members. No one was able to identify the source. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Katherinehobbs (talk • contribs) 05:53, 26 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by After Midnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:59, 19 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Looks like a building to me. Angus McLellan (Talk) 02:07, 23 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 06:38, 12 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 06:38, 12 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 06:38, 12 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 06:38, 12 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by After Midnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:59, 19 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Melesse (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 09:21, 5 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Kept, PD tag removed, renominated NRD. After Midnight 0001 18:07, 13 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Kept, PD tag removed, renominated NRD. After Midnight 0001 18:07, 13 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Keep. After Midnight 0001 12:04, 22 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Keep. After Midnight 0001 12:04, 22 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Keep, tagged non-free. After Midnight 0001 16:23, 13 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Keep, tagged non-free. After Midnight 0001 16:23, 13 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Kept, PD tag removed, renominated NRD. After Midnight 0001 18:00, 13 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I took the photo at my office with my camera.Donmike10 (talk) 16:46, 26 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
BMacA is not quite right but close. Coins are 3d objects according to Godwin so PD-art is not appropriate. Evidently there's no copyright in a thousand year-old coin, only in a modern picture of one. Personally I don't see how coins are significantly more 3d than some paintings, but what the hell do I know? TinEye and the Wayback machine say this image came from here. So not free + replaceable = bummer. Angus McLellan (Talk) 02:18, 23 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by After Midnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:59, 19 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Keep, tagged non-free. After Midnight 0001 16:23, 13 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 06:38, 12 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 06:38, 12 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 06:38, 12 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 06:38, 12 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 06:38, 12 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by After Midnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 13:41, 12 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by After Midnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 13:41, 12 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by After Midnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 13:41, 12 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by After Midnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:59, 19 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]