The result of the discussion was: Sourced and licensed via Flickr/OTRS. VernoWhitney (talk) 21:28, 23 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:05, 4 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:05, 4 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
License updated, close as keep. Angus McLellan (Talk) 12:47, 10 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: moving to ifd. Files marked as fair use should not be nominated here as we already know they are non-free. --B (talk) 18:39, 21 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: delete, in the sense of let's-move-it-to-Commons-and-see-how-it-does. Reading the Commons discussion, it seems that we do indeed have a very good argument that this is in fact public domain. And since it looks like it would fail fair use on en.wiki, we might as well move it over, because if we can't have it on Commons, we won't be able to host it locally, either. SchuminWeb (Talk) 01:24, 4 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]