The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:04, 14 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:BlackmailStill.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Isn't this not only copyright in the U. K., since the author died less than 70 years ago, but copyright in the U.S., under the Uruguay Round Agreements Act —innotata 01:31, 31 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Future Perfect at Sunrise (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 17:12, 8 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:11National Auditorium.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Professional photo from an angle not likely accessible to the uploader. Eeekster (talk) 01:35, 31 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:04, 14 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Zabolotskaya small.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Very suspicious. On the one hand, nothing similar on Google or TinEye, but on the other hand, no metadata and a history of copyright problems by the uploader. I don't know what to do with this, honestly. If it's bad, it needs to go, but I can't be 100% sure either way. Sven Manguard Wha? 04:23, 31 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I tagged it as ((di-no-source)) because it does not specify the source. The way I see it, ((PD-self)) cannot be used by itself to imply that the uploader took the photo, because that tag is misused often. However, Nyttend removed my tag, saying that the license does imply that the uploader took the photo. Can we have some kind of consensus about what to do in that situation? Also, I agree with Sven in that this is a very suspect/low-res photo, and it is most likely a copyvio. Logan _Talk ^{Contributions} 04:26, 31 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I tend to ignore "self" claims in such cases, if there's a recorded history of previous bad uploads by the same editor. Fut.Perf. ☼ 07:22, 31 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:04, 14 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Zaharije Orfelin.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Whatever the source is/was, it isn't milosevits.ctd.hu (the listed source) which is broken and illegible even when run through a translator. I went there to find the author, but at this point, I can't even find the image. Sven Manguard Wha? 04:30, 31 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:04, 14 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Zahid.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Source is questionable at best, "The picture came from an old school yearbook. The yearbook didn't have any copyrights or anything. I'm not sure if it's OK to keep this image. If it's not OK please remove it." Sven Manguard Wha? 04:42, 31 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:04, 14 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:ZeraphineLive01.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Uploader says own work but also says it's from the Zeraphine website, which isn't linked to, and when I went to the site, indicated blanket copyright. Uploader also has a history of copyright issues. Sven Manguard Wha? 04:55, 31 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:04, 14 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Plethoracats lg.gif (delete | talk | history | logs).

• I don't see any obvious sign on the source website, that the image is licensed under CCbySA Srleffler (talk) 05:09, 31 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This illustration appears on p. 57 of <The Secret Art of Dr. Seuss>, Random House, copyright 1995 (ISBN 0-679-43448-8) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Maggie8161948 (talk • contribs) 22:53, 13 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:04, 14 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Taken 11.2008.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• File is showing three results on tineye and is here with a copyright mark - no evidence of persission - uploader appears to have a history of deleted file claims. See the users talkpage for previous deleted claims User_talk:GeNtLeMaNLDN - he still has a couple that have not been deleted and I suggest we action all at the same time. File is showing three results on tineye and is here with a copyright mark - no evidence of persission - uploader appears to have a history of deleted file claims. This one unused - File:Picture_taken_03.2009.jpg in Dubai and this one Picture_taken_03.1987_-_Copy.jpg in the Albert hall, some results from tineye, looks like a crop of promo pic to me and this one claims to have taken himself in Bombay, not being used - none of the pics has any meta data and looking at the deleted ones the user claimed they owned - I suggest there is not permission for any of them. Off2riorob (talk) 15:03, 31 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Nuke all, obviously not a trustworthy uploader. Fut.Perf. ☼ 16:45, 31 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:04, 14 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Nebraska Holocaust Memorial 1.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• see Commons:Deletion requests/File:Nebraska Holocaust Memorial Stone.jpg; would likely qualify for fair use, but is not used in any articles. Magog the Ogre (talk) 20:20, 31 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.