The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:03, 18 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Middleton.Troy.Bust.LSU.20120401.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• 3D artwork that may be under copyright. Eeekster (talk) 00:28, 10 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:03, 18 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ymchipicnic.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Orphaned image includes a logo which is most likely copyright. -- ТимофейЛееСуда. 00:29, 10 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:03, 18 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Windows Experience Index.png (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Derivative work of Microsoft Windows. Stefan2 (talk) 01:02, 10 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:03, 18 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Transfagarasan-romania.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Copied from http://www.realitatea.net/traficul-este-blocat-pe-transfagarasan-din-cauza-unei-alunecari-de-teren_719549.html - Andrei (talk) 10:59, 10 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:03, 18 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Cover of Riverhouse's New EP..jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Dubious own work. Stefan2 (talk) 11:36, 10 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:03, 18 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Jules andre peugot.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• It says that this was published before 1923 but the source does not mention any publication of this photo. Stefan2 (talk) 11:44, 10 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:03, 18 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Photo of Henry Nicholas Gunther.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• It says that the uploader took the photo himself in 1917 or 1918. Is the uploader really more than 90 years old? Stefan2 (talk) 11:49, 10 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:03, 18 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ladewlight.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• The Ladew Gardens visitor policy states, "Permission must be obtained in advance from Ladew Gardens for commercial photography or artwork, or any rendering of Ladew property." As public domain would allow commercial use, the file cannot have that license unless the photography obtained permission to release the photograph under this license. No such statement is made that permission was obtained. Therefore we must assume permission was not granted and the file must be deleted for copyright concerns. Jason Quinn (talk) 17:54, 10 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment I don't know what the guidelines are in this case, but I actually took this picture from outside the paid admission area. I have never noticed any such rules stated anywhere on the premises, but I'm sure they would not be noticed from the parking lot. If current guidelines allow this to be kept, I would support keeping it. I can support its deletion if there is a guideline that doesn't allow it. But I do believe it is in the best interest of all to have a photo of the subject somewhere in the article. Sebwite (talk) 15:04, 11 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • There's a Wikipedia article that covers this a bit, Photography_and_the_law#United_States. Of course, that page ought to only be considered a rough guideline because, as you know, every state has its own laws. I was just at Ladew Gardens a couple weeks ago. Presently there is a sign (not sure how long it has been erected) at the Gardens restricting photography to private, non-commercial use. It is posted on the small road that goes from the entrance to the parking lot. The parking lot itself is almost certainly private property owned by Ladew Gardens so this photography cannot be put into the public domain. I agree with you that it would be nice to have a photograph but it's in Wikipedia's own best interest to respect the law and copyright as much as possible. I think this case is a clear no-go. Jason Quinn (talk) 16:41, 12 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
    • Could flower and tree arrangements be seen as artworks per Commons:COM:FOP#United States? If not, it is possible that failure to comply with photo restrictions exclusively is a matter between the photographer and the garden and that the only one who could be fined is the photographer. --Stefan2 (talk) 12:53, 13 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
      • I don't know. Jason Quinn (talk) 22:34, 13 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• One question: since Wikipedia is non-profit, does this qualify as "commercial?" The purpose of a Wikipedia article is just to provide neutral, factual information on a subject, not to sell, promote, or otherwise advance their cause. Sebwite (talk) 06:41, 15 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • See wmf:Resolution:Licensing policy: images are supposed to be free according to the Definition of Free Cultural Works version 1.0. According to that definition, one requirement for a work to be considered as free is that it can be reused commercially. Although Wikipedia is non-commercial, it is not possible to claim any exemptions for works limited to non-commercial use. --Stefan2 (talk) 22:09, 15 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
    • With that being the case, the solution may be not to delete it but to change the licensing tag to whatever would best fit, perhaps fair use. Sebwite (talk) 04:15, 16 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:03, 18 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Bend 2007.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Orphaned image is of artwork and unknown original copyright. -- ТимофейЛееСуда. 17:57, 10 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:03, 18 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Musikapella3rd.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Unlikely to be the copyright holder as the image has the musikapella logo visible. MilborneOne (talk) 18:17, 10 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:03, 18 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:KKBC.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Declared as user created but with a history of dodgy uploads this is unlikely to be the work of the uploader MilborneOne (talk) 18:21, 10 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:03, 18 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Bc may11.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Composite image from a user without a clear understanding of copyright is unlikely to be the work of the uploader MilborneOne (talk) 18:26, 10 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:03, 18 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Animated Evil Eye.gif (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Invalid license tag and no source. Eeekster (talk) 18:48, 10 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• The uploader has now provided a source and retagged the file ((attribution)), but the new source says, “These animations are free to take and use, but I would be very grateful for any donations however small.” This statement permits use of the image, but not redistribution or derivative works, either of which would bypass users going to the source site and seeing the plea for donations. —teb728 t c 21:22, 15 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as F4 by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:03, 18 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Andy Rosa Adler.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Appears to be grabbed from subject's twitter account: https://twitter.com/#!/andynbcla/ Eeekster (talk) 18:51, 10 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: keep and tag as missing permission. Magog the Ogre (talk) 03:03, 20 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Edward Upward.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• The comment "Photo taken around 1972 by J. Allinson" conflicts with the license tag claim of self-work. Eeekster (talk) 19:02, 10 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• Apologies - the photographer, J. Allinson, gave permission but hasn't a Wikipedia account and I uploaded it for him. Should he create an account and upload it again? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dave A (talk • contribs) 17:44, 11 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Just ask the photographer to send an e-mail to OTRS confirming that the uploader has authorised the upload. See WP:CONSENT for instructions. --Stefan2 (talk) 13:29, 14 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT⚡ 02:03, 18 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Darlington.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• The current revision has neither source nor licence. The previous revision also appears here with an earlier modification date. Stefan2 (talk) 20:46, 10 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:03, 18 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:CaldwellBuilding.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Image was uploaded in Nov. 2009, but was posted to [1] in 2006. Unknown if uploader owns rights to photo. -- ТимофейЛееСуда. 20:50, 10 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT⚡ 02:03, 18 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Pittacus.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Doesn't appear to be a 2D work, so ((PD-Art)) doesn't apply. Stefan2 (talk) 21:12, 10 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:03, 18 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:De luigi guggenheim.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Image is photo of work of art. Unknown copyright on work of art. -- ТимофейЛееСуда. 21:34, 10 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:03, 18 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:De luigi rio de janeiro.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Image is photo of work of art. Unknown copyright on work of art. -- ТимофейЛееСуда. 21:34, 10 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:03, 18 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Impossible Venice Polaris.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Image is photo of work of art. Unknown copyright on work of art. -- ТимофейЛееСуда. 21:34, 10 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: keep and tag as missing permission. Magog the Ogre (talk) 03:05, 20 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:TRG Techcasts Logo Cropped.png (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Dubious own work. Stefan2 (talk) 23:02, 10 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I did create this image for a post on my website, for a new service that the website I write for was offering. TRG Techcasts is a podcast network featuring 5 shows, and this work is originally mine. I created the logo in Adobe Photoshop CS5 using primarily the rectangle & line tools (with the help of distortion tools to create the curved lines on the radio waves), and the font used in the "Techcasts" word is a font that the author did clear for me to use commercially. I have several references from other employees of the website who were present when I created the logo. I will gladly provide their names and email addresses if necessary. I claim 100% that this work is my own. Therealgeeks (talk) 23:23, 10 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

For a logo that you've made yourself, I think it would be better to prove ownership using OTRS to get some proof that you are related to the website. For instructions, see WP:CONSENT. --Stefan2 (talk) 22:11, 12 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:03, 18 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:O Canada (Bilingual).ogg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• The lyrics might be in the public domain, but there is no evidence that this particular recording is in the public domain. Stefan2 (talk) 23:11, 10 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:03, 18 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Occupywallstreetlewisandclark12.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• The formulation "permission to use on wikipedia" might mean "permission only to use on wikipedia". In either case, there is no evidence of permission. Stefan2 (talk) 23:15, 10 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.