The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete as CSD F3, improper license. De728631 (talk) 17:40, 22 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Matilda II, Oberon Aust., 2013.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Permission for CC-BY 1.0 not at the indicated source. The source only has a permission for Wikipedia. If that is the only permission which is available, then this is speedily deletable per WP:CSD#F3. Stefan2 (talk) 10:30, 13 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

• Do whatever you want, I've lost interest in trying to contribute anything there GeoffW1 (talk) 11:28, 13 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete. The logo is original enough to be copyrightable, and a fair use rationale cannot be applied for the targeted article 2012–13 Iran Pro League which is just a list. Moreover the image is apparently the logo of the "Gulan football association" that has no article on the English Wikipedia either. De728631 (talk) 19:20, 22 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Rasht logo.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Invalid PD reason. Stefan2 (talk) 10:35, 13 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This image is currently tagged as non-free. If there is a dispute with the rationale, please tag the image with ((dfu)) or list it at WP:Non-free content review. AnomieBOT⚡ 11:07, 13 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; incorrectly tagged as non-free, and the creator, Kevin W., has not released the image under license, and in fact asked for its deletion. Dianna (talk) 20:45, 8 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:BigTen-Uniform-UN.png (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Originally listed as unfree, then changed to free licence by someone other than the uploader. No evidence that the uploader has licensed this under a free licence. If unfree, then it is replaceable by a free drawing of the same clothes. Stefan2 (talk) 10:37, 13 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

• I have no objection to the image being deleted, as I no longer want my work to be used by Wikipedia. --Kevin W. - Talk 18:42, 13 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• I have restored the fair use rationale. This can't be replaced by a free version since it includes a logo and may otherwise be protected by copyright. See also ((Non-free sports uniform)). De728631 (talk) 19:26, 22 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • All of the logos on these clothes are below the threshold of originality and are thus in the public domain. Also, clothes are in the public domain in the United States because they are utilitarian objects. ((Non-free sports uniform)) is largely wrong, see WT:NFC#Template:Non-free sports uniform. --Stefan2 (talk) 19:51, 22 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This image is currently tagged as non-free. If there is a dispute with the rationale, please tag the image with ((dfu)) or list it at WP:Non-free content review. AnomieBOT⚡ 20:12, 22 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: retagged as fair use --B (talk) 15:20, 7 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Telemundo 17 Logo.png (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Although the old revision looks like a ((PD-textlogo)), the current revision looks too complex for that. Stefan2 (talk) 10:43, 13 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • I have added a fair use rationale and reduced the resolution, so we might want to keep it. De728631 (talk) 19:01, 22 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This image is currently tagged as non-free. If there is a dispute with the rationale, please tag the image with ((dfu)) or list it at WP:Non-free content review. AnomieBOT⚡ 19:11, 22 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as F5 by Diannaa (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:03, 2 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:City of Qom logo.jpg.png (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Invalid PD reason. Stefan2 (talk) 10:44, 13 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This image is currently tagged as non-free. If there is a dispute with the rationale, please tag the image with ((dfu)) or list it at WP:Non-free content review. AnomieBOT⚡ 11:07, 13 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Why should be deleted an image tagged as fair use ? Fma12 (talk) 23:51, 16 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

It seems that the licence was changed while I was checking this image. It was previously listed as freely licensed. --Stefan2 (talk) 00:00, 17 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. The current FUR is faulty since we cannot use non-free images for illustrating simple lists. I'd use it for the article Qom but there is no proper source for the image either. De728631 (talk) 00:10, 18 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • Regarding the related discussions, this is most likely not even the logo of the city of Qom but of the Qom provincial football association for which there is no article. De728631 (talk) 19:29, 22 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as F5 by Diannaa (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:03, 2 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Lorestan logo.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Invalid PD reason. Stefan2 (talk) 10:44, 13 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This image is currently tagged as non-free. If there is a dispute with the rationale, please tag the image with ((dfu)) or list it at WP:Non-free content review. AnomieBOT⚡ 11:07, 13 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as F5 by Diannaa (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:03, 2 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Bandar Abbas logo.png (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Invalid PD reason. Stefan2 (talk) 10:44, 13 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This image is currently tagged as non-free. If there is a dispute with the rationale, please tag the image with ((dfu)) or list it at WP:Non-free content review. AnomieBOT⚡ 11:07, 13 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as F5 by Diannaa (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:03, 2 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Karaj logo football.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Invalid PD reason. Stefan2 (talk) 10:44, 13 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This image is currently tagged as non-free. If there is a dispute with the rationale, please tag the image with ((dfu)) or list it at WP:Non-free content review. AnomieBOT⚡ 11:07, 13 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as F9 by Diannaa (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:32, 3 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Khosro Heydari 2011.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• See Commons:Commons:Deletion requests/File:Karim Ansarifard in training.jpg. Stefan2 (talk) 10:49, 13 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as F9 by Diannaa (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:32, 3 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Karim Ansarifard.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• See Commons:Commons:Deletion requests/File:Karim Ansarifard in training.jpg. Stefan2 (talk) 10:50, 13 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Magog the Ogre (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:03, 8 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Antonio Simões.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• It says that this photo is in the public domain in Iran since the photo was published more than 30 years ago. There is no evidence that the photo was published more than 30 years ago, but more importantly, there is no information as to why this would be in the public domain in the United States. It is presumably in the public domain in Iran since Iran only provides copyright protection to Iranian works. On the other hand, the United States provides copyright protection to Portuguese works, and considering that this is a photo of a Portuguese person, it is reasonable to assume that Portugal is the source country for the photo. Stefan2 (talk) 10:58, 13 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as F8 by Diannaa (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT⚡ 07:05, 2 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Yahya Golmohammadi.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• The uploader has uploaded lots of files with copyright problems, so I'm not sure if it is a good idea to trust the "own work" claim here. Stefan2 (talk) 10:59, 13 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete since there was no evidence for the uploader's permission. De728631 (talk) 19:13, 22 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:HM King Abdullah II - 2012.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• It says that some kind of permission has been granted, but it doesn't say what kind of permission the person granted or how to verify that permission really has been granted. Stefan2 (talk) 13:27, 13 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • It says permission was granted by the office of the King, so wouldn't you contact the office of the King to verify it? -- 65.92.180.137 (talk) 06:08, 14 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
    • The uploader should forward the permission to OTRS. See WP:CONSENT. --Stefan2 (talk) 10:46, 14 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Diannaa (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 22:14, 8 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Statue near JSCA international cricket stadium.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Given the problems with the uploader's other images, it is likely that this also is a copyright violation. Stefan2 (talk) 13:39, 13 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as F9 by Diannaa (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 22:14, 8 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Amjad Adaileh.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Everywhere on the Internet in lower resolution, for example here: http://watananews.net/news.php?n_id=13298 Stefan2 (talk) 13:41, 13 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Kept, with the addition of a fair use rationale. Dianna (talk) 20:25, 8 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:BTPlogo.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Invalid PD reason. Stefan2 (talk) 14:33, 13 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Kept, with the addition of a fair use rationale. Dianna (talk) 20:23, 8 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Centre Ice Rink logo.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Looks too complex for ((PD-textlogo)). Stefan2 (talk) 14:34, 13 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Diannaa (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 22:14, 8 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:ChumCoverage.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Invalid PD reason. Stefan2 (talk) 14:34, 13 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Keep, with the addition of a fair use rationale. Dianna (talk) 20:19, 8 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Civitella Casanova-Stemma.png (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Invalid PD reason. Stefan2 (talk) 14:34, 13 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Keep, with the addition of a fair use rationale. Dianna (talk) 20:20, 8 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:CIRET logo.png (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Invalid PD reason. Stefan2 (talk) 14:35, 13 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This image is currently tagged as non-free. If there is a dispute with the rationale, please tag the image with ((dfu)) or list it at WP:Non-free content review. AnomieBOT⚡ 20:13, 8 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; it's a derivative work of a non-free logo. We don't need it for fair use, as there's already a logo present in the article. Dianna (talk) 20:09, 8 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Djoliba AC (logo).jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Invalid PD reason. Stefan2 (talk) 14:36, 13 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment from file uploader, I informe you that the file was maked by me by photoshop. Regards. --Fayçal.09 (talk) 22:53, 13 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by B (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 17:10, 7 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Dmna-logo.gif (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Invalid PD reason. Stefan2 (talk) 14:36, 13 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Keep, with the addition of a fair use rationale. Dianna (talk) 20:07, 8 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Commission on Presidential Debates logo.svg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Looks too complex for PD-textlogo. Stefan2 (talk) 14:36, 13 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• If the Best Western logo isn't complex enough for copyright, I'm thinking this isn't either (since the only thing remotely complex is just an outline of an eagle repeated 2.5 times; the majority is simple text). See Threshold of originality. —Locke Cole • t • c 11:45, 14 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • The Best Western logo only contains letters, but this logo contains a very complex bird. It is far more complex than the copyrighted man with a suitcase which you can see here. --Stefan2 (talk) 13:57, 14 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
    • Anyone can claim copyright, but simply saying something is true does not make it so. It is my belief that this image is far too simple to be eligible for copyright (trademark, sure, but not copyright). —Locke Cole • t • c 08:48, 15 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
      • The claim that the man with the suitcases is copyrightable was made by the United States Copyright Office (by granting copyright registration), i.e. the same entity which claimed that the Best Western logo isn't copyrightable (by rejecting the copyright registration), so both claims are just as reliable. This looks far more complex than both the man with a suitcase and the Best Western logo due to the birds. --Stefan2 (talk) 11:01, 15 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• According to the online catalogue of the Copyright Office, the Commission on Presidential Debates has so far only registered a text and three videos, not any specific logo. De728631 (talk) 23:50, 17 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • However, it isn't mandatory to register works for copyright, although Americans are required to register their works for copyright if they wish to enforce their copyrights. --Stefan2 (talk) 18:58, 18 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• Mark as nonfree. Complex enough for copyright, but it's the logo of the organisation on whose article it appears; this is a textbook case of fair use. Nyttend (talk) 16:18, 18 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Diannaa (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 21:14, 8 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ecologycenterberkeleylogo.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Invalid PD reason. Stefan2 (talk) 14:37, 13 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment from file uploader, either this file, or an alternate file, File:Ecologycenterberkeleylogolong.gif, (now in use at article Ecology Center (Berkeley)), should probably remain to illustrate the article. I am myself not sure if either or both qualify for transfer to the Commons as a company logo (one is more complicated, but is tagged as appropriate for the commons, so maybe both can be transferred?). If I am incorrect in my understanding of what can remain on WP or the commons, I have no problem with any decision, as the guidelines for such files are not my strongest area of expertise.Mercurywoodrose (talk) 18:03, 13 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• Deleting admin comment: Non-free logos do not get transferred to the Commons. One non-free logo per article please. This one is being deleted and File:Ecologycenterberkeleylogolong.gif will be kept, since it is properly templated and it is in use. -- Dianna (talk) 19:45, 8 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Diannaa (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 21:14, 8 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Fairleigh Dickinson University's College at Florham Devils Logo.png (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Invalid PD reason. Stefan2 (talk) 14:38, 13 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Diannaa (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 21:14, 8 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Flag of Endingen.png (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Invalid PD reason. Stefan2 (talk) 14:38, 13 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Garion96 (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:01, 12 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:FrontierRoute.png (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Invalid PD reason. Stefan2 (talk) 14:39, 13 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

  Looks valid to me. A simple silhouette of a windswept tree. The other Ontario tourist route logos are identically licensed. - Floydian ^τ _¢ 06:47, 15 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

  The art looks fairly complex. I don't think that this is below the threshold of originality. --Stefan2 (talk) 19:00, 18 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

  I think some more opinions may be necessary since we seem to have opposing takes on this. - Floydian ^τ _¢ 08:18, 3 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

  My opinion is that almost all the logos currently in the article List of Ontario Tourist Routes are incorrectly tagged as they do not consist purely of typefaces, individual words, slogans, or simple geometric shapes, and are over the threshold of originality. In addition to FrontierRoute.png, these ones are on en.wiki:

• File:DeerTrailRoute.png
• File:GoldenHighwaylogo.png
• File:HeritageHighwaylogo.png- this one is pretty simple and is in my opinion correctly tagged as PD
• File:VoyageurRoute.png
• File:WellandCanalRoute.png

These ones are on the Commons:

• File:ACHT.png - this one is pretty simple and is in my opinion correctly tagged as PD
• File:AlgonquinTrail.gif
• File:BluewaterTrail.svg
• File:OilHeritageRoutelogo.png
• File:TalbotTrailLogo.png - this one is pretty simple and is in my opinion correctly tagged as PD
• File:TFCHlogo.png
• File:WineRoutelogo.gif - this one is pretty simple and is in my opinion correctly tagged as PD -- Dianna (talk) 20:02, 8 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I have nominated most of those images for deletion. Many of the images were originally uploaded by 718 Bot (talk · contribs). I believe that this means that the bot converted a file from GIF or JPG to PNG, but I can't figure out who the original uploaders were, so I wasn't able to notify them of this. --Stefan2 (talk) 20:55, 8 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note there's a parallel discussion of most of these files at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2013 April 8#File:DeerTrailRoute.png. -- Dianna (talk) 18:33, 7 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by B (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 17:10, 7 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Garage Mahal Presents logo.png (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Invalid PD reason. Stefan2 (talk) 14:39, 13 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Diannaa (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 21:14, 8 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Studio Pindrop.tif (delete | talk | history | logs).

File:Studio Pindrop New Delhi.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Probably not own work. Not sure if this is eligible for copyright or not, considering the letter "I" in the second word which is not purely text but also embeds art. Stefan2 (talk) 15:34, 13 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.