The result of the debate was delete. WjBscribe 17:18, 17 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

---

I highly doubt someone will write in the former trying to get the latter.--Wizardman 18:04, 10 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

The result of the debate was keep by consensus. --Aarktica 23:55, 15 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Useless as a redirect because anyone searching for Tortuga in the PotC series would search for "Tortuga". — Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.144.106.39 (talk • contribs) 12:54, 10 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep. A merge was performed and history needs to be kept for GFDL compliance. While there are other ways to do that, redirects are cheap so let's stick with the easiest. -- JLaTondre 19:13, 10 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep I didn't even notice that, but because the redirect is relevant, the "cheap" argument holds. Placeholder account 19:16, 10 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep - Personally I find the ouctome of the merge awful as it conflates a geogroahcila aplce with a film location and the island looks now part of some Disney universe. Which is on top of above another reason to keep the redirect, so that hopefully some content is moved back there. --Tikiwont 13:40, 11 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

The result of the debate was delete. John Reaves (talk) 05:58, 16 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Nonsensical redirect «»bd(^talk _stalk) 06:53, 10 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. Seems to be a nonsense redirect. bibliomaniac15 03:22, 11 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

The result of the debate was delete. John Reaves (talk) 05:58, 16 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Nonsensical redirect «»bd(^talk _stalk) 06:53, 10 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom. Tim.bounceback^{(review me! | talk | contribs | ubxen)} 00:49, 11 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

The result of the debate was keep. WjBscribe 17:17, 17 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

---

Cleanup of referral links on Ensemble disambig per WP:DPL Erpbridge 20:00, 10 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep, plausible misspelling, and redirects are cheap. Redirects to dab pages are absolutely acceptable, and don't need cleanup or disambiguation. I've tagged it as a redirect from misspelling; that should be sufficient. Xtifr _tälk 20:59, 11 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• This is what redirects are for. John Reaves (talk) 05:58, 16 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep, I see this typo all the time --Closedmouth 09:27, 16 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.