The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Keep ~ Amory (u • t • c) 00:39, 17 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

• Galleria Post Oak → The Galleria (Houston) (links to redirect • history • stats)     [ Closure: keep/delete ] 

Mall never went by this name. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 20:40, 9 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

• keep. For whatever reason, many store finders and other websites give it this name or Galleria-Post Oak, and there is nothing else that this phrase refers to so there is no point in deleting. Thryduulf (talk) 21:15, 9 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

• The only results I get list "Galleria, Post Oak, location, location." As in, "Galleria" and "Post Oak" just happen to be next to each other in a list of multiple locations. I see nothing under "Galleria Post Oak" that does not use a comma. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 21:22, 9 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep per TPH's findings of "Galleria, Post Oak", making the comma-less version a reasonable search term. -- 65.94.76.126 (talk) 04:30, 11 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

• But it's coming up only because Galleria and Post Oak are next to each other. The two are unrelated entirely. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 13:15, 11 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep or retarget There are plenty of links on the first page of Google results showing that these names either refer to the same neighborhood, or neighborhoods so close together that they are lumped together as one. A guide to Galleria-Post Oak bars, Galleria-Poat Oak Hotels, plus numerous business in the area putting Galleria=Post Oak in their names, and the Hilton Post Oak hotel at the Galleria. That said, the Galleria-Post Oak usage usually refers not to the mall, but to the neighborhood, so a retarget to Uptown Houston is probably in order. Ego White Tray (talk) 12:33, 13 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Speedy close, can be handled via ((db-move)). Non-admin closure. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 21:21, 9 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

• Big Hero Six (film) → Big Hero 6 (film adaptation) (links to redirect • history • stats)     [ Closure: keep/delete ] 

It's a bit of a complex issue to explain. The article originally began as Big Hero Six (film). An editor tried to correct the name to the proper title, Big Hero 6 (film), but instead of ordinarily moving the page, the editor redirected it. In an effort to preserve the edit history of the original, I propose that the current redirect be deleted and then the actual page be moved from Big Hero 6 (film adaptation) to Big Hero 6 (film), its proper and correct name. ~ Jedi94 (talk) 19:42, 9 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete and histmerge per nom. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 20:41, 9 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• Am I right in thinking what you want to do is actually to move Big Hero 6 (film adaptation) to Big Hero 6 (film)? If so why have you listed Big Hero Six (film) (which you don't want to move anything from or to) here and not listed the move you want to make at Wikipedia:Requested moves per the instructions here? In any event of the three titles, one should be the article and the other two should redirect to it, so keep the nominated redirect and list the move at WP:RM. Thryduulf (talk) 21:09, 9 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.