< November 4
November 6 >

November 5

This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on November 5, 2013.

Template:Petula Clark discography (United States)

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Steel1943 (talk) 03:59, 15 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

バスケットボール

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. --BDD (talk) 00:53, 12 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Japanese is not integrally important to these topics. Gorobay (talk) 13:56, 5 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Xiamen-Shenzhou Railway

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2013 November 14#Xiamen-Shenzhou Railway

Gait redirects

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete four. Two nominations were withdrawn. WJBscribe (talk) 23:06, 12 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

None of these subjects have been discussed in the target article for nearly three years, since a large amount of content was removed as unreferenced in November 2010, and thus all are potentially confusing. Some have several incoming links, which indicates that those may have potential for an article, in which case WP:RFD#DELETE #10 applies as well. jcgoble3 (talk) 04:24, 5 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Current events redirects

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. WJBscribe (talk) 12:50, 12 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

None of these subjects have any article or portal listing current events for these places. Unless some relevant target can be found, I would say to delete all. Ego White Tray (talk) 04:02, 5 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Any reason not to soft retarget to Wikinews? Emmette Hernandez Coleman (talk) 00:35, 11 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Cross-wiki redirects in article space are never a good idea in my opinion - they're confusing to readers. Readers (and editors) expect to find articles in mainspace, not an advert for a Wikimedia sister site. And as a red link they have a link to Wikinews anyway! Wikipedia doesn't have information on the topic so therefore these shouldn't be in article space. 5.70.64.235 (talk) 00:27, 12 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Why wikipedia is great

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Even with the new proposal to retarget to another title, it seems like consensus is to not have the original redirect, or the cross-namespace redirect. (non-admin closure) Steel1943 (talk) 03:55, 15 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Not neutral and nothing in the target article explains "why Wikipedia is great". This was originally a CNR but that will obviously not do. Taylor Trescott - my talk + my edits 01:04, 25 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

We do not want to encourage CNRs. Taylor Trescott - my talk + my edits 19:24, 25 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Emmette Hernandez Coleman (talk) 00:49, 5 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

In the absence of any objections, I'm relisting and retargeting this to Wikipedia:Why Wikipedia is so great per my above comment. We have consensus that this should not be a redirect to Wikipedia; do we want to keep this as a redirect to Wikipedia:Why Wikipedia is so great (or some other target)? Emmette Hernandez Coleman (talk) 00:49, 5 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Islamic Council in Germany

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. WJBscribe (talk) 12:46, 12 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This redirect should be deleted because it points to another organisation. It would be preferable to see red links making it obvious that an important article is missing here. PanchoS (talk) 09:25, 5 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
More