< December 19
December 21 >

December 20

This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on December 20, 2015.

Afghanistani (disambiguation)

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. --BDD (talk) 15:23, 28 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Request deletion because the target Afghanistani has not been a disambiguation page for sometime, and currently redirects to Afghan. Afghanistani was a dictionary definition since at least 2011, despie being tagged as a disambiguation page. Nothing links to this redirect, except for this deletion discussion. The redirect was bot created in 2011. --Bejnar (talk) 22:44, 20 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The Wikipedia Adventure

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2015 December 30#The Wikipedia Adventure

Gary Trainor

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. I think I should take extra caution because this discussion could become a precedent. From my reading of the discussion below and my own review of the search results, the "delete" side has correctly pointed out that there are two people called "Gary Trainor". Neither is independently notable but both are mentioned in other articles - Meghan Trainor's father, and an actor in Beautiful: The Carole King Musical. This creates a valid case of WP:XY which should trump the two other valid arguments - "keep as ((R from relative))" and "delete it's not useful" - as neither addresses WP:XY. "Notability is not inherited" is also mentioned below but another editor has already pointed out that it isn't relevant to redirects. Deryck C. 21:49, 2 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Created by editor and then immediately redirected by same editor. A couple of problems with this: Gary Trainor (father of musician Meghan Trainor) is unlikely to be searched for; there is an Irish actor named Gary Trainor who could be searched for and readers will redirected incorrectly. I don't see the need for this redirect and believe it qualifies for deletion. Notability is not inherited. -- WV ● ✉ ✓ 16:36, 20 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

How is this any different than Austin Swift redirecting to Taylor Swift or Tish Cyrus redirecting to Billy Ray Cyrus? But I know that you will rule that out as WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS so, here it goes:

He collaborated thrice on Trainor's album, Only 17, I believe that is enough to target his name to the nearest relevant page. --MaranoFan (talk) 19:42, 20 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Oxygenshortages

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. --BDD (talk) 15:23, 28 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Fake made up stickwordstogether redirects. Legacypac (talk) 16:21, 20 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

God Manifest

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2015 December 28#God Manifest

Dwellingplaces

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. --BDD (talk) 15:22, 28 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A dwelling place is called a house in English. Legacypac (talk) 15:56, 20 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Fiveyear plans

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2015 December 29#Fiveyear plans

Ducttapers

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was speedily deleted by Sphilbrick. --BDD (talk) 14:53, 21 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Sticking two words together does not make it a good redirect. Pluralizing something that should not have an S is not good either. Neelix, so can be speedy deleted if desired. Legacypac (talk) 15:50, 20 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Excuse that typo. --Rubbish computer (Merry Christmas!: ...And a Happy New Year!) 00:14, 21 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Onedimensional man

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. --BDD (talk) 15:21, 28 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

puremade upword by slidingtwo wordstogether. Legacypac (talk) 15:38, 20 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Tricon Global Restaurants Incorporated

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2015 December 28#Tricon Global Restaurants Incorporated

Antiimperialisms

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was speedily deleted by Catfish Jim and the soapdish. --BDD (talk) 14:53, 21 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

None of these are actual words. The search engine is smart enough to find the answer if you type these, so they are just spreading bad words across wiki mirrors. Legacypac (talk) 15:17, 20 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

My Masters

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was speedily deleted by SouthernNights and Sphilbrick, respectively. --BDD (talk) 03:58, 28 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Made up meaning by Neelix. This could be how a slave addresses his master or lots of other things Legacypac (talk) 15:13, 20 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

My great one

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was speedily deleted by Feezo. --BDD (talk) 14:55, 21 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Neelix was playing with meanings and seems to have come up with this one for the target. Highly unlikely anyone will use this to search or link. The article says Rabbi can mean "great one". Legacypac (talk) 15:09, 20 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Introducingly

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. --BDD (talk) 15:21, 28 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

another double ending nearly fake word. Legacypac (talk) 15:06, 20 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Discuss-Dubious (t/c) 22:12, 21 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Hustlingly

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. --BDD (talk) 15:20, 28 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Neelix redirect, 344 total ghits for this essentially made up word. A few people have created it too, but it's just not a proper word. Legacypac (talk) 15:03, 20 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Pharisaists

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2015 December 28#Pharisaists

Indian Land

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was no closure action required (except removal of RfD template). The conclusion is "keep redirect, create relevant disambig page and add hatnote from primary target", which has already been enacted. Read the amazing iterative debate below on how editors in this debate solved the problem amongst themselves. Well done everybody. Deryck C. 21:29, 2 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

while this was pointed by Neelix at a proposed town by this name, I'm not at all convinced this is the best target on wikipedia for the term which referred to large parts of the USA and was used in other countries. Ideas? Legacypac (talk) 14:40, 20 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Including the country of India. Legacypac (talk) 16:10, 20 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Perhaps, but "Indian Land" seems like only a PTM for the book, unless that's a standard shorthand for it or something. --BDD (talk) 14:56, 21 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The book, to me, is an indication that Indian Land relates to land controlled by Indians as a primary meaning. I'd never heard of the small community in SC before, but it is common usage to refer to native reserves near me as Indian Land. However most of the Google hits on first page relate to the town, so I'm not too concerned about deleting it. Legacypac (talk) 03:22, 22 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • I would agree with that for the most part. I wouldn't say it's the same thing exactly, but they are similar enough topics where merging makes sense. -- Tavix (talk) 21:29, 22 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • They're the same to the extent that the same topics are listed on both dabs, so why not combine them? One can redirect to the other; no preference on which. Ivanvector 🍁 (talk) 22:15, 22 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • So we move the text The terms Indian Country, Indian Reserve, and Indian Territory may be easily confused. Articles on related topics are titled as follows into Indian reserve (disambiguation), redirect IC (d) and IL to it, and do whatever else is useful that I've forgotten? That seems entirely reasonable to me, and if that's what you mean, I'll support it unless I hear a better idea. Nyttend (talk) 02:10, 23 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Exactly. Legacypac (talk) 01:06, 24 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation and redirection done here: Indian reserve (disambiguation). Feel free to adjust if I missed something. Legacypac (talk) 17:51, 28 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  • I've undone this since it disrupts the ability for the closer to comprehend the consensus in this discussion. If consensus results in this change, it can be performed when the discussion is closed. Steel1943 (talk) 19:57, 1 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
don't worry only questionable ones are sent to RfD. Legacypac (talk) 02:32, 2 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Andhra Kshatriyas

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. --BDD (talk) 15:19, 28 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The redirect creates the false impression that Raju are Kshatriya (this is one of the major warring issues in caste articles on Wikipedia and we routinely reject self-aggrandising claims). Sitush (talk) 11:46, 20 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I took it as a personal name that included the caste. Maybe I took it wrong, but I agree the caste should not be redirected to here either. If this is an alternate name for the caste, redirect to the caste page. Legacypac (talk) 17:11, 28 December 2015 (UTC):[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

John Allen Wyeth

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was withdrawn by nominator. Non-admin closure. Safiel (talk) 05:28, 20 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This article and the target article were created in the last couple of days. The target article was FAR better than this article, so I changed this to a redirect. No title disambiguation is needed since there are no other notable persons of the same name. Delete this redirect and its brief history as an article and move the target here, without leaving a redirect. Safiel (talk) 05:22, 20 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Pepsi B

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete all. Just Chilling (talk) 23:52, 27 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

These are no longer mentioned at the target section. I can't figure out what they're referring to. --BDD (talk) 05:07, 20 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Yves Fauqueur

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. --BDD (talk) 15:37, 29 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Pepsi Sí

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Nabla (talk) 20:19, 30 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Not mentioned at the target article or at List of Pepsi variations, which would be the more likely place. Googling seems to confirm that Pepsi has marketed such a product, but I can't really tell if it's actually different from regular Pepsi. --BDD (talk) 04:31, 20 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

To Pepsi or List of Pepsi variations? Not the latter, because it's not actually a different product. I'm skeptical of the former, too, unless it can be demonstrated that this is part of a noteworthy marketing to Hispanics. As is, this looks like it's just a variant packaging. Bud Light is perennially released in cans with colors corresponding to a local sports team, sometimes even with NFL logos if I remember correctly. Pepsi products had characters from Star Wars: Episode I at one point. Same stuff on the inside, though. --BDD (talk) 21:01, 22 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Agreed, Delete it seems like a minor packaging variation - less significant than bilingual Canada vs US (where there may even be a formula variation I understand). I'm good with delete. Legacypac (talk) 08:42, 23 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Fault(geology)

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was no consensus. --BDD (talk) 15:17, 28 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I considered tagging this one with CSD #3, but it may not qualify for speedy under that criteria, so posting here instead because I'm not seeing how this one is practical. Dawnseeker2000 18:51, 12 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, BDD (talk) 04:16, 20 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

World flesh devil

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete all. Nabla (talk) 20:10, 30 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

As a closer, I found no consensus at this previous batch nomination. On my own, I find a subset of these worthy of deletion. Those that have no punctuation or other indication of being a list seem like unlikely/nonsense search terms. If this were likely, you'd expect to see something like Father son holy ghost extant. As a side note, if you're looking for a fun theme park for the whole family, I really can't recommend either Devil Flesh World or Flesh Devil World. Not at all. --BDD (talk) 03:21, 20 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Discuss-Dubious, wouldn't that apply to World flesh devil as well? --BDD (talk) 20:00, 23 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I guess so; it's more like a search string than a good redirect. Discuss-Dubious (t/c) 00:59, 24 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Celtic hand

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. --BDD (talk) 15:17, 28 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Possible (OR) regarding the redirect as no sources claim that there is such a medical name. Zyc1174 (talk) 00:03, 20 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
More