< January 16
January 18 >

January 17

This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on January 17, 2015.

Banque de terminologie du Québec

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. --BDD (talk) 16:23, 24 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete mojibake. Gorobay (talk) 21:29, 17 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Update crime groups Philippines

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was : Deleted, implausible redirect, article has been created by a sockpuppet of a blocked user. Organized crime in the Philippines itself has been redirected to Crime in the Philippines. - Mike Rosoft (talk) 20:51, 19 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

strange title created by sock puppets Legacypac (talk) 18:57, 17 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

African American transsexuality

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was deleted by JohnCD. --BDD (talk) 18:37, 3 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per WP:REDLINK. Back in 2006, this was an article, and its AfD closed as redirect. The article was actually deleted and the title recreated as a redirect, though. It's not mentioned at the target article, so it's definitely misleading as is. Restoring the old article is also an option. I've undeleted its revision history, so anyone can take a look at it now. Pinging the AfD's closing admin, Dominic; I'm sure he remembers the eight-year-old case like it was yesterday. BDD (talk) 16:05, 17 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Help:Namespace

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. --BDD (talk) 16:15, 24 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know what mean, it's a cross-namespace redirect to project page. 333-blue 14:17, 17 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Wikipedia:Uldus Bakhtiozina

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was : Deleted per below. - Mike Rosoft (talk) 07:26, 18 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

unnecessary redirect from wikipedia namespace to article namespace DexDor (talk) 10:27, 17 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Pulse Blade

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. --BDD (talk) 16:15, 24 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This is a concept related to the target that is neither is synonymous with the target article, nor mentioned at the target article. Also, it seems that this redirect was previously an article, but the article seems like a violation of WP:NOTWIKIA. Steel1943 (talk) 04:25, 17 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  • @BDD: Nope. I just, from time to time, look at random articles with popular video game subjects to see what redirects point towards them that seem to either be misleading or not explained well enough at the redirects' target to justify the redirects' existence. The fact that I, in a short amount of time, nominated two similar redirects that point to two different video game subjects is pure coincidence. Steel1943 (talk) 17:29, 18 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Nobama

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to List of U.S. presidential campaign slogans#Critical slogans. It looks like we're unanimous here. --BDD (talk) 18:38, 3 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I was surprised that this term isn't mentioned on the target page. I somewhat expected a Criticism of Barack Obama page, but it redirects there as well. The only mention of the term on Wikipedia is at List of U.S. presidential campaign slogans. Too trivial to retarget there? I'm not sure. At this point, I'd be fine with that or deletion. BDD (talk) 00:46, 17 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Comment. Actually, "NOBAMA" is listed at that target, not "Nobama". I was not trying to be picky but having inadvertently left case-sensitive search on, I couldn't find it at first, since it's not R to section ("Critical slogans"). If retargeted, make it R to section. (Not sure that's a great section title when the rest are chronological, but that's a matter for the A not the R.) Si Trew (talk) 03:07, 19 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
To spare anyone else a confused comment, "NOBAMA" is mentioned on the list of slogans, not Criticism of Barack Obama. --BDD (talk) 14:17, 20 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
More