< July 17
July 19 >

July 18

This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on July 18, 2016.

Articles for deletion/Komala Pata

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete.---- Patar knight - chat/contributions 23:24, 25 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unhelpful cross-namespace redirect. Redirects to the Wikipedia namespace are excluded from WP:CSD#R2. 24.205.8.104 (talk) 20:50, 18 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Wycliffe Associates

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. -- Tavix (talk) 17:54, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Wycliffe Associates and Wycliffe Bible Translators USA are two separate organizations. It is misleading and inaccurate to direct Wycliffe Associates searches to the Wycliffe USA organization page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 209.12.63.253 (talk) 20:02, 18 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

... Wycliffe Associates (WA)—a smaller and separate organization from Wycliffe USA (the American chapter of Wycliffe Bible Translators)—is leaving Wycliffe Global Alliance (WGA), a partnership of more than 100 Bible translation agencies around the globe.

A plausible new target is not found among the few that mention Wycliffe Associates. Sam Sailor Talk! 21:08, 18 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Oklahoma Sports Museum

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to Jim Thorpe Association#Oklahoma Sports Museum.---- Patar knight - chat/contributions 23:26, 25 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delte, since the redirect is quite misleading. RekishiEJ (talk) 17:17, 18 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • It turns out that I couldn't find as many sources as I thought I could, but I did find one that says that it's operated by the Jim Thorpe Museum. I've created a section at Jim Thorpe Association#Oklahoma Sports Museum, and the redirect should be retargeted there. -- Tavix (talk) 20:38, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Final Fantasy loveless

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. -- Tavix (talk) 17:53, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

WP:NOTWIKIA. I consider myself a Final Fantasy fan, but had to look up Loveless, a fictional literary work from one of the games. It's not covered anywhere on Wikipedia; it's too detailed a topic. BDD (talk) 14:10, 18 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

NICSICSC

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Discussions about the viability of the draft should be taken up on the author's talk page.---- Patar knight - chat/contributions 23:30, 25 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Implausible redirect. This was actually created as an article for the 14th season of "NCIS", well before the season has started, but contained some dubious sourcing for the only listed episode's title so it has been redirected. However, the redirect is implausible as it's just a random use of the letters C, I, N and S. AussieLegend (✉) 11:41, 18 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • I appreciate the clarification. I don't have a problem with the deletion, I just wanted to point out that RFD usually isn't in the business of deleting article content. -- Tavix (talk) 23:21, 18 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
That looks like the creator's intent. [3] This was just a filler name until the editor could do it. The editor also tried to create the article in their own userspace. [4] So this would be appropriate housekeeping deletions. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 18:47, 19 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Looking at the history, it seems he actually created it at User:Babelcolour5/NCIS (season 14) and then moved it to User:NCIS (season 14). He then created NICSICSC and moved User:NCIS (season 14) back to User:Babelcolour5/NCIS (season 14). --AussieLegend (✉) 19:05, 19 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Idealogue

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget Idealogues so that both redirect to Ideology. -- Tavix (talk) 17:56, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

These should obviously not point to different places, but I'm not sure which is best - or even if there is a good target at all? Both are originally Neelix redirects, but Idealogue was retargetted in 2008 by Adoniscik. Thryduulf (talk) 10:11, 18 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Exacerbate

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to Exacerbation. --BDD (talk) 18:54, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

These Neelix redirects are not pointed at the right place in my opinion. My first thought was to change the first to a soft redirect to Wiktionary and point the others at it, however I then discovered we have Exacerbation, which is itself essentially just a dicdef article, so I've come here seeking additional views on the best target. Thryduulf (talk) 10:05, 18 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Crooked Hillary

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was speedy delete per WP:CSD#G4 and WP:CSD#G10. I've also salted the title for year. Thryduulf (talk) 08:39, 18 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Potential WP:BLP violation. Unless we create some article like List of nicknames given by Donald Trump, then I don't think we should have pages like this. FallingGravity (talk) 05:05, 18 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Womanizers

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to Promiscuity#Male promiscuity. -- Tavix (talk) 18:01, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

No possible way this is the best target. Perhaps disambiguation is best? Oiyarbepsy (talk) 04:49, 18 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Petrou

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was convert to set index. Thanks, IP. --BDD (talk) 21:05, 26 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A redirect from middle name. Oiyarbepsy (talk) 04:03, 18 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

VolleyballAt2016SummerOlympics

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. --BDD (talk) 21:04, 26 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

See WP:R#D6. Stefan2 (talk) 17:22, 10 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Thryduulf (talk) 00:45, 18 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
More