June 22

This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on June 22, 2016.

STAINLESS Steel

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete.---- Patar knight - chat/contributions 02:00, 29 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unlikely capitalization. (@Steel1943:, you didn't spot this one, did you?) - Champion (talk) (contribs) (Formerly TheChampionMan1234) 12:11, 22 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Haha! Foiled again! Sneaky redirect tricked me with "steel" at the end rather than the beginning! (By the way, I'm neutral on this one.) Steel1943 (talk) 12:14, 22 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I agree to an extent. I often find myself wishing R3 wasn't restricted to "recently created" redirects (kind of like the "Neelix concession," which I've wanted under the R3 umbrella instead of G6). However, I'm afraid of abuse if that were to be opened up. -- Tavix (talk) 16:14, 22 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I'm beginning to think that prodding might be the most sensible way of doing it. I'm wondering if it can be extended to redirects. Uanfala (talk) 17:32, 22 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Lynix

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete.---- Patar knight - chat/contributions 02:00, 29 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This is actually a girl's name, albeit an uncommon one. I don't see how this would be a typo for Linux. - Champion (talk) (contribs) (Formerly TheChampionMan1234) 12:07, 22 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Shaliyuan

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. JohnCD (talk) 10:24, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete WP:R#D2 confusing and WP:RFOREIGN. Chinese name of a North Korean city. The target is not known by this name in English, while some Chinese localities are known by this name (see e.g. zh:Template:PRC admin/data/44/02/04/101/201 for one in Shaoguan; Google says there's another one in Huizhou; etc.). 210.6.254.106 (talk) 11:25, 22 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Edric Egberuare

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete.---- Patar knight - chat/contributions 02:00, 29 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Non-notable person, will mislead the reader. - Champion (talk) (contribs) (Formerly TheChampionMan1234) 05:14, 22 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Chåmpionship

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete.---- Patar knight - chat/contributions 02:00, 29 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Not a valid name in any language. - Champion (talk) (contribs) (Formerly TheChampionMan1234) 05:12, 22 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This is similar to me nominating something like Steel worker. Oh right ... I did do that. Steel1943 (talk) 12:00, 22 June 2016 (UTC) [reply]
  • @Steel1943:Ha ha, I couldn't think of anything better to find redirects to, so I thought, "why not?". - Champion (talk) (contribs) (Formerly TheChampionMan1234) 12:02, 22 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Google Spain

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete all. JohnCD (talk) 13:27, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

WP:REDLINK I doubt readers will get what they want, they would just get a domain name. It makes sense for we have Microsoft Japan and Google China, for example. All of them basically have links from other articles. - Champion (talk) (contribs) (Formerly TheChampionMan1234) 05:01, 22 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

MacOS

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep as is for now. -- Tavix (talk) 17:52, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Should this redirect to Mac OS instead, as it is now renamed macOS (note the lowercase m). Please see Talk:OS X for more information. (I am neutral about this redirect, but just thought I'd bring it up here)- Champion (talk) (contribs) (Formerly TheChampionMan1234) 04:22, 22 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • It appears it has already gone through an RM and failed to achieve the consensus to move. More interesting is the fact that the result of the RM is being repeated here... For now, I believe it is appropriate to convert to a dab page until "macOS" becomes the common name. —Best regards, Codename Lisa (talk) 08:45, 26 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Yeah, in a case like that, this discussion probably should have gone to WP:MRV or a new move request started at Talk:OS X. The "delete to move OS X here" seem to be the equivalent to "support" votes in the referenced closed move discussion. (In fact, I think I may ask the closer to relist that discussion...) Steel1943 (talk) 20:22, 23 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Calculatable

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to computability. -- Tavix (talk) 18:05, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The ability to calculate, the implied meaning of these redirects, is distinct from calculation. I assume calculatability is an important topic in computer science, but I don't know what article to point to. Oiyarbepsy (talk) 03:52, 22 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.