The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Deryck C. 12:37, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Alternative cook stove → Cook stove  (links · history · )     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Unclear what the word "alternative" is meant to exclude. Steel1943 (talk) 23:24, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom. -- Notecardforfree (talk) 00:05, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete as confusing --Lenticel ^(talk) 01:46, 4 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was retarget Erse. Deryck C. 12:37, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Earse → Scottish Gaelic  (links · history · )     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

I'm having a hard time finding a connection. "Earse" isn't mentioned at the target and wikt:earse doesn't exist. My search was dominated by misspellings of erase or ears. -- Tavix ^(talk) 22:31, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep, apparently an old name for the language [1]. – Uanfala (talk) 23:18, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep Retarget to Erse per Uanfala. There is also a passage in the Samuel Johnson article that says that Johnson once entered into a dispute "over the authenticity of James Macpherson's Ossian poems, claiming they could not have been translations of ancient Scottish literature on the grounds that 'in those times nothing had been written in the Earse [i.e. Gaelic] language'" (emphasis added). -- Notecardforfree (talk) 00:09, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• And for those wondering, as I was, where that name comes from, the OED says it's from the same Old English root as "Irish", and was the word that the folks from the (Scots-speaking) Lowlands called the Scottish Gaelic–speaking fellas in the Highlands. And it was also occasionally used to refer to the Irish language, so I'm wondering if this isn't getting borderline dabable now. – Uanfala (talk) 01:21, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Dabable it is indeed. Erse is already a dab page (and the OED gives Earse and Erse as spelling variants) so scrap my keep !vote above and instead retarget there. – Uanfala (talk) 01:25, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    • I agree, redirect to the dab page Erse. I was responsible for creating this redirect long ago (I don't remember why, but possibly because of the Samuel Johnson reference quoted above). I think I would have redirected to "Erse" even back then, if the dab page existed and if I had known about it! Andrew Dalby 09:49, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Retarget to Erse per Uanfala. --Lenticel ^(talk) 00:02, 5 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was (batch closure) delete as unopposed. Deryck C. 12:40, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Alternative Press Award[edit]

• Alternative Press Award → Utne Reader  (links · history · )     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Not mentioned in target article. Alternative Press Music Awards may be a possible retargeting option, but it seems that the target of the redirect may be eligible for WP:REDLINK as a standalone subject unrelated to Alternative Press Music Awards. Steel1943 (talk) 22:13, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Portfolio selection, management, and performance[edit]

• Portfolio selection, management, and performance → Portfolio (finance)  (links · history · )     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

The title of this redirect seems so WP:PRECISE that it is actually incorrect. Steel1943 (talk) 21:58, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom. -- Notecardforfree (talk) 00:11, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Alternative Portfolio Selection models[edit]

• Alternative Portfolio Selection models → Portfolio (finance)  (links · history · )     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Unclear what the use of the word "alternative" is meant to exclude. Also, Portfolio selection model, Portfolio selection models, Portfolio Selection model and Portfolio Selection models do not exist. Steel1943 (talk) 21:56, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom. -- Notecardforfree (talk) 00:11, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Alternative One[edit]

• Alternative One → A-One (TV channel)  (links · history · )     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

No evidence that this is an alternative name for the target article's subject. Possibly an invented name. Steel1943 (talk) 21:28, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Alternative Olmec origin speculations.[edit]

• Alternative Olmec origin speculations. → Olmec alternative origin speculations  (links · history · )     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Unlikely, WP:COSTLY redirect due to the period at the end of the redirect's name. (Alternative Olmec origin speculations has been created to remedy the period issue.) Steel1943 (talk) 21:26, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was retarget Climate change in California#AB 1493. Deryck C. 12:49, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• California Assembly Bill 1493 → California Air Resources Board  (links · history · )     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 
• California AB 1493 → California Air Resources Board  (links · history · )     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 
• CAB 1493 → California Air Resources Board  (links · history · )     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 
• AB 1493 → California Air Resources Board  (links · history · )     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

"1493" and the word "bill" are nowhere in the target article. Steel1943 (talk) 21:13, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Retarget all to Climate change in California#Legislation Climate change in California#AB 1493, which mentions AB 1493. This is a significant piece of legislation, and all of these are plausible search terms for readers who want to know more about the law. -- Notecardforfree (talk) 00:19, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • @Notecardforfree: Wouldn't Climate change in California#AB 1493 be a more preferred target for these? Steel1943 (talk) 01:00, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    • @Steel1943: Ah yes! That's definitely the better target; my mind must have been playing tricks on me. Thanks, -- Notecardforfree (talk) 01:03, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. -- Tavix ^(talk) 00:53, 12 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Strategic Innovation and Research Initiative → California Air Resources Board  (links · history · )     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Not mentioned in target article. Steel1943 (talk) 20:49, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. This is a fairly obscure term and it looks like readers aren't searching for it. The viewership statistics show only 4 hits at this redirect in the last 90 days. -- Notecardforfree (talk) 01:04, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. -- Tavix ^(talk) 00:53, 12 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• AFV Institute → Alternative fuel  (links · history · )     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

No such subject is mentioned in the target article. Steel1943 (talk) 20:40, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. -- Tavix ^(talk) 00:53, 12 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Alternative Fuels & Vehicles National Conference and Expo → Alternative fuel  (links · history · )     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

No such subject is mentioned in the target article. Steel1943 (talk) 20:38, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. -- Tavix ^(talk) 00:53, 12 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• AFVI Expo → Alternative fuel  (links · history · )     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

No such subject is mentioned in the target article. Steel1943 (talk) 20:37, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. -- Tavix ^(talk) 00:53, 12 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Nu folk → Indie folk  (links · history · )     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Between the redirect's current target and its previous target Freak folk, it is unclear which one of these subjects the redirect refers, if either at all. Steel1943 (talk) 20:32, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. -- Tavix ^(talk) 00:53, 12 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Alternative Digital Singles → Alternative Songs  (links · history · )     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Redirect name not mentioned in target article, so connection is unclear. Steel1943 (talk) 20:20, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. --BDD (talk) 18:16, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Alternative Adjectives for U.S. citizens → Names for United States citizens  (links · history · )     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 
• Alternative adjectives for U S citizens → Names for United States citizens  (links · history · )     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 
• Alternative adjectives for U. S. citizens → Names for United States citizens  (links · history · )     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 
• Alternative adjectives for U.S. citizens → Names for United States citizens  (links · history · )     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 
• Alternative adjectives for US citizens → Names for United States citizens  (links · history · )     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Target article is unclear on what the term "Alternative" is meant to exclude. Steel1943 (talk) 20:03, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete all the article isn't a list of adjectives. Searching for alternative names or alternative terms would be more appropriate. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 20:09, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete all per nom. -- Notecardforfree (talk) 00:25, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. These don't make sense. They were created 9 years ago via a move here. Presumably what they were trying to get at was something along the lines of, "alternative adjectives for the common way of referring to U.S. citizens, which is 'American'". It didn't make sense as an article title, and it doesn't make sense as a redirect, as it's difficult to think of a case where anyone would ever type in or come across this phrase.--Cúchullain ^t/c 23:07, 7 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. --BDD (talk) 18:15, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Alternative access to space → Non-rocket spacelaunch  (links · history · )     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Unclear why the term "alternative" has to be exclusive to anything "non-rocket", or even that "access to space" is exclusive to "spacelaunch". In fact, Access to space doesn't exist. Steel1943 (talk) 19:59, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom. -- Notecardforfree (talk) 00:26, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was keep, now that the term as been added to the target. -- Tavix ^(talk) 00:33, 12 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Alternative aggression → Relational aggression  (links · history · )     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Phrase is not mentioned in the target article, nor is there evidence presented in the article that this phrase is an alternative name for the subject. Steel1943 (talk) 19:57, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for getting in touch with me about this. The term "alternative aggression" is used in Odd Girl Out, one of the seminal books on the topic. See especially pp. 8–9. FWIW I added the redirect because I could never remember the name that other Wikipedians had assigned to the article.

If you do not mind taking your time to educate me, is it standard to require evidence that a redirect term is an alternative term used to refer to the topic of an article? -- Marie Paradox (talk) 20:31, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Marie Paradox: My apologies for the delayed response; I started performing a lot of edits here, and just noticed this. I'd say that if this term could be added to the lead paragraph, that may be enough, but preferably with a reference added such as the one you mentioned above. Steel1943 (talk) 01:37, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Steel1943: there is no need to apologize; I found your response to be quite prompt. I have made edits to the "relational aggression" page along the lines you have suggested. Do you feel there is anything else that needs to be done? -- Marie Paradox (talk) 03:14, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep for the reasons mentioned above. -- Marie Paradox (talk) 19:42, 8 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. --BDD (talk) 18:15, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Alternative arrangements → Executive arrangements#Alternative arrangements  (links · history · )     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 
• Alternative arrangement → Executive arrangements#Alternative arrangements  (links · history · )     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

This issue with these redirects is that they don't redirect to an encyclopedic subject by this name. But rather, the section which these redirects target explains an aspect of the article's subject, but the subject is just about arrangements while identifying them with the adjective "alternative". Also, the section's text uses the phrase "alternative executive arrangements", which is not a title or a letter/punctuation variation of these redirects. Steel1943 (talk) 19:51, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was retarget the first to Earl of Plymouth#Earls of Plymouth; Third creation (1905), and delete the second. --BDD (talk) 18:07, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Other Windsor-Clive → Other Windsor  (links · history · )     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 
• Other Windsor-Clive (disambiguation) → Other Windsor  (links · history · )     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

There is only one "Other Windsor-Clive" listed at the target disambiguation page, but it's a WP:REDLINK. Steel1943 (talk) 19:34, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect Other Windsor-Clive to Earl of Plymouth, the main article mentioning him. Boleyn (talk) 07:29, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. --BDD (talk) 18:06, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Other characters (Suikoden) → List of characters in the Suikoden series  (links · history · )     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Unclear what characters this redirect is meant to identify/exclude due to the use of the word "Other". Steel1943 (talk) 19:28, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete This looks like some auto-generated redirect so it isn't helpful. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 20:10, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. --BDD (talk) 18:05, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Other solar systems → Extrasolar object  (links · history · )     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Two issues here ... the vagueness of the word "other" since the word is not clear on what it is meant to exclude, and the target article isn't correct anyways. According to the target article, the subject of the article is about objects in the Solar System or galaxies, not about the Solar System or galaxies themselves. Steel1943 (talk) 19:21, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. -- Tavix ^(talk) 00:31, 12 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• NNNN → Neeku Nenu Naaku Nuvvu  (links · history · )     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Makes sense that its an abbreviation, but that's going over board unless it can be proven to be very common like RHTDM, DDLJ where they were marketed and popularly known by their short-forms. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 10:17, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Weak Delete - I also don't believe that this abbreviation is in common use. CoffeeWithMarkets (talk) 03:56, 11 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Deryck C. 12:50, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• 美非峰会 → United States–Africa Leaders Summit  (links · history · )     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

No affinity for Chinese. - CHAMPION ^{(talk) (contributions) (logs)} 09:43, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom. -- Notecardforfree (talk) 00:27, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom --Lenticel ^(talk) 01:48, 4 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom. Gluons12 ^☢|☕ 13:52, 9 November 2016 (UTC).[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. --BDD (talk) 18:05, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Thirudan(film) → Vijay Antony  (links · history · )     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

There is only one film named "Thirudan", so this redirect with the "(film)" extension is unnecessary. Kailash29792 (talk) 09:38, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete, but for another reason. There is no space before the opening parenthesis. Thirudan (film), with a space, should be created as a redirect to Thirudan tagged with ((R from unnecessary disambiguation)). GeoffreyT2000 (talk, contribs) 02:04, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. --BDD (talk) 18:04, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Qinghua University nuclear power and the new energy technology research institute → Institute of Nuclear and New Energy Technology  (links · history · )     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Strangest search term I've seen. Delete, why would anyone search this, there are multiple errors in the title. - CHAMPION ^{(talk) (contributions) (logs)} 07:29, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete and salt for 40 years. (i.e. expires 10-20 years before said Congress is due to take place.) This is the longest definite time-span I've ever applied onto a Wikimedia project. Deryck C. 12:48, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• 138th United States Congress → List of United States Congresses  (links · history · )     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

• 140th United States Congress → List of United States Congresses  (links · history · )     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

• 141st United States Congress → List of United States Congresses  (links · history · )     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

• 143rd United States Congress → List of United States Congresses  (links · history · )     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

These redirects are for far future congresses, and Wikipedia is not a crystal ball. GeoffreyT2000 (talk, contribs) 03:50, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete all per WP:CRYSTAL. Also, FYI, I saw that the RFD notice template was missing on the redirects for 140th United States Congress, 141st United States Congress, and 143rd United States Congress. I went ahead and added it per WP:RFD#HOWTO. -- Notecardforfree (talk) 00:37, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete and salt future U.S. Congresses should be unraveled when there's enough information to write about them or when they can be considered for List_of_United_States_Congresses#List_of_upcoming_Congresses AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 19:57, 5 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.