The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Retarget . [Retarget to Boom Boom per discussion.] Jax 0677 (talk) 21:16, 27 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Boom Boom Boom (disambiguation) → Boom Boom Boom  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

No such disambiguation page exists. However, the history at this title was previously a disambiguation page rather than a redirect. Steel1943 (talk) 22:05, 18 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• The action requiring the least messing about with existing pages would be retargeting to Boom Boom, a disambiguation pages that lists two Boom boom booms among its many Boom booms. – Uanfala (talk) 22:44, 18 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  That's a lot of booms. Steel1943 (talk) 23:56, 18 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  :) not nearly as many as the buffaloes over there. – Uanfala (talk) 00:04, 19 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Retarget the dab to Boom Boom as it is already prepped to list the notable multiples of Boom, having those entries in its lead sentence. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 17:32, 19 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Retarget per AngusWOOF. ---- Patar knight - ^chat/_{contributions} 17:38, 19 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Retarget per AngusWOOF before RfD sounds too much like Baldrick's poem. Thryduulf (talk) 12:35, 24 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was keep. -- Tavix ^(talk) 17:59, 29 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Test5 → Template:uw-block  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Retarget to Template:uw-vblock because this more clearly states vandalism. UpsandDowns1234 (🗨) (My Contribs) 19:01, 18 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment: This redirect is a ((R with history)). Steel1943 (talk) 22:07, 18 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Additional comment: This redirect has a transclusion that may need to be updated pending the result of this discussion. Steel1943 (talk) 22:25, 18 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep - but re target as needed. — xaosflux ^Talk 22:22, 18 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep, do not retarget as the template covers more than vandalism. -- zzuuzz ^(talk) 22:41, 18 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• ((uw-block)) is too general. It would be better to specify vandalism. UpsandDowns1234 (🗨) (My Contribs) 16:16, 20 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep, and do not retarget. Test5 was never a vandalism-only template. The current target is correct. Mackensen (talk) 22:55, 18 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment. The templates ((Test1)) through ((Test4)) are currently at TfD. – Uanfala (talk) 23:06, 18 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • That RfD has been closed as "no consensus". Thryduulf (talk) 12:37, 24 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. The BLP arguments are stronger than WP:CHEAP. -- Tavix ^(talk) 17:57, 29 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Eleby → Interstate 85 bridge collapse  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

• Basil Elbey → Interstate 85 bridge collapse  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

• Michael Eleby → Interstate 85 bridge collapse  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

• Sophia Bruner → Interstate 85 bridge collapse  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

All of these redirects are dubious per WP:BLP. The first three refer to a non-notable individual suspected, but not yet convicted, of causing the collapse; the last is a separate individual who is only charged with trespassing. All of these titles are in fact a part of the move history of the page, because one editor intentionally moved the page to all of these titles and back in the space of five minutes - this does not trump BLP. In any case; the target page is currently the only one containing the string "Eleby" on Wikipedia; if someone somehow only knew that name and not what the individual is charged with, they could still easily find the page without these redirects. 64.105.98.115 (talk) 03:26, 18 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete all, but for different reasons:
  • Bruner, because she's not mentioned
  • Michael Eleby, because he's not mentioned
  • Basil Elbey, because that's a spelling mistake, and spelling-mistake-for-blp1-redirect is going a bit too far in an ordinary situation like this
  • Eleby, because redirecting a surname for these reasons is going a bit too far
• Nyttend (talk) 10:54, 18 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep all except Michael Eleby - Bruner was involved in the incident, "Basil Elbey" is a plausible typo, and redirects such as "Eleby" are cheap. --Jax 0677 (talk) 13:08, 24 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.